1 / 21

Review

Review. Biases? Heuristics? Overconfidence Optimism Hindsight bias Overreaction. Which Circle is larger?. Biases. Intuition can not be trusted! Must be supplemented by analytical thinking Use a ruler to dispel the illusion! Systematic errors of judgement:bias Normative analysis

reilly
Download Presentation

Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review • Biases? • Heuristics? • Overconfidence • Optimism • Hindsight bias • Overreaction

  2. Which Circle is larger?

  3. Biases • Intuition can not be trusted! • Must be supplemented by analytical thinking • Use a ruler to dispel the illusion! • Systematic errors of judgement:bias • Normative analysis • rational solution to a decision problem • Descriptive analysis • how real people actually make decisons • Prescriptive analysis • practical advice that you can use for rational decisions

  4. Decision Making Process • Decision: a choice between gambles • outcomes of possible options are not known in advance! • You make judgements about probabilities • You assign values to outcomes • You combine these beliefs and values to form preferences • Judgements can be systematically wrong! • Systematic errors of judgement are called biases!

  5. Which is? • The more frequent cause of death? • Homicide? • Stroke?

  6. Heuristics • The process by which people find things out for themselves • Usually by trial and error! • Trial and error leads to rules of thumb • This process leads to errors • sometimes systematic errors! • These rules of thumbs themselves • came to be called heuristics! • Availability heuristic • availability bias!

  7. What is your best estimate? • Dow Jones 1998 • Closed at 9181 • DJIA does not include reinvested dividends • What would be the closing value of DJIA be? • If DJIA were redefined • to reflect the reinvestment of all dividends? • Since May 1896 • when its value was 40 • Give your Best Guess, Low guess, High Guess • so that you feel 90% confident that true value lies between your low guess and high guess

  8. Overconfidence • Highly systematic bias • forecasts of stock prices • forecasts of earnings per share • trades of investors (trading too much) • People set narrow confidence bands • high guess is too low • low guess is too high! • Well calibrated professionals • meteorologists • face similar problems every day • make explicit probabilistic predictions • obtain precise and immediate feedback on outcome

  9. How good are you? • How good a driver are you? • Compared to drivers you encounter on the road are you • Above-average? • Average? • Below average?

  10. Optimism • Optimists • exaggerate their talents • underestimate the likelihood of bad outcomes • are prone to an illusion of control • underestimate the role of chance in human affairs • misperceive games of chance as games of skill • Overconfidence and Optimism combined • overestimate knowledge • underestimate risks • exaggerate their ability to control events • Vulnerable to statistical surprises? • DeBondt, 1998

  11. Did you know? • On the day before the Bank of England announcement, what was your estimate of the probability that interest rates would remain constant? • Do you think you have estimated the direction of change in FTSE100 correctly last week? • Now, have a look at the forecasts you made last week, have you estimated the direction of change for FTSE100 correctly?

  12. Hindsight Bias • Reality looks much more obvious in hindsight than in foresight! • People with hindsight bias • perceive events that occurred to have been more predictable

  13. Hindsight Bias • People can rarely reconstruct, • after the fact, what they thought about the probability of an event before it occurred • Earlier estimate of probability is exaggerated after the event occurs • Events that were not anticipated • often appear almost inevitable after they appear • Hindsight • promotes overconfidence • creates the illusion that the world is more predictable than it really is • turns reasonable gambles into foolish mistakes

  14. Which one is more likely? • You are tossing a coin six times. Which of the following sequences is more likely to occur? HHHTTT HTHTTH

  15. Which one is more likely? • You have tossed five coins and observed the following sequence HHHHH • Now, you are tossing the sixth coin. • Heads or Tails?

  16. Overreaction • Human mind is pattern-seeking • biased to think that a casual factor is at work! • perceive patterns where non exists • have too much confidence in their judgements of uncertain events • Fund managers that were successful • for a few years in a row? • Odean, 1998 • Individual Investors • who sold a stock and bought an other one immediately • the stock they sold outperformed the one they bought by 3.5% in a year!

  17. Overreaction • DeBondt and Thaler, 1984 • Question: • Does overreaction affect stock prices? • Answer: • Yes! • Loser portfolios experience exceptionally larger returns than winner portfolios (25%!) • Implication • Weak form market inefficiency • Explanation to the January Phenomenon

  18. Research Design • Monthly stock price data • excess returns calculated using 3 different benchmarks • research period 1926-1982 • Portfolio formation • Start in December 1932 (t=0) • compute excess returns for the previous 3 years • repeat this for all non-overlapping 3 year periods • for each portfolio formation date rank cumulative abnormal returns from high to low • firms in top decile constitute winner portfolio • firms in bottom decile constitute loser portfolio

  19. Analysis • Compute • cumulative abnormal returns • for all portfolios for the next 36 months • Compare • winner versus loser portfolios • Cumulative abnormal returns at t=36 • each portfolios’ returns • at t=0 and t=36

  20. Results Loser portfolio Cumulative Abnormal Returns Winner portfolio Months after portfolio formation

  21. Summary • Biases? • Heuristics? • Overconfidence • Optimism • Hindsight bias • Overreaction

More Related