1 / 21

‘Performance Management, Lean and Sickness Absence Management – Workers Paying for the Crisis’

‘Performance Management, Lean and Sickness Absence Management – Workers Paying for the Crisis’. Professor Phil Taylor University of Strathclyde 24 May 2011 Communication Workers Union Bournemouth. Crisis and Recession. Two elephants in the room:- 1) Recession 2) ConDems

reese
Download Presentation

‘Performance Management, Lean and Sickness Absence Management – Workers Paying for the Crisis’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ‘Performance Management, Lean and Sickness Absence Management – Workers Paying for the Crisis’ Professor Phil Taylor University of Strathclyde 24 May 2011 Communication Workers Union Bournemouth

  2. Crisis and Recession • Two elephants in the room:- 1) Recession 2) ConDems • Catastrophic failure of the de-regulated neo-liberal economic hegemony that has dominated for decades • Pain inflicted from years of corporate greed and hubris • The ‘credit crunch’ trivialised the crisis • Spread beyond immediate origins in the financial services sector but FS crisis goes on – RBS catastrophic job losses • Economist – Great Recession to Great Stabilisation but to where? –debt overhang, double dip recession, US stats show a jobless recovery, British recovery fitful if not pitiful • The illegitimate ConDem government – 36% voted for the Tories on a 65% turnout means only 1 in 4 of eligible votes • BA ballots – 90%+ on 80% turnout, 81% x 79%, 79% x 75%

  3. 64% of the electorate did NOT vote for…. • ...billions of cuts...NHS privatisation...attacks on the poorest • …on H&S regulation…on sickness absence…on students…on the destruction of the public university • New politics are the old politics of class rule and privilege • Making workers pay for a crisis not of their own making • Clear that nationalisation was no return to Keynsianism, no return to ‘statised’ controls, but nationalisation of last resort – until ‘normal service’ is resumed • Hester - £2.04m bonus for 2010, Eric Daniels – £1.45m • RBS’ ‘return to profitability’ - redundancies are unjustifiable when RBS de facto state owned • Guardian - £50bn in bank bonuses – service as normal • Cuts in public spending will deepen the recession • 26 March Demo– 500,000+ shows depth of discontent

  4. Employers’ Cost Reduction StrategiesSTAR and Balkanisation

  5. Domestic Outsourcing • Has expanded so that IT, F&A, HR are outsourced • Growth in domestic outsourcing in contact centres but signs mixed • Can be challenged on grounds of quality and cost • Balkanisation of companies – Capita and Santander • Growth of Capita as Financial Services company – Craigforth result • Overseas Offshoring • What is the post-recession evidence? • Increase in back-office and IT offshoring, mixed evidence on voice migration, some return of voice etc. called reshoring • Capita’s growth in India – Axa and Prudential centres • WNS running Aviva • Case against offshoring can be developed – cost and attrition

  6. Automation • Co’s wish to move to self-service and automation - IVR • Reduce headcount in contact and service centres • Rhetoric that it would lead to up-skilling unproven • Performance Management, Lean and Work Intensification • Perhaps the most important from the perspective of the union and of the ‘survivors’ • Workers paying for the crisis is translating into an unprecedented intensification of work • Restructuring, re-engineering ,‘lean’ – creative synergies • Equivalent or larger volumes of work with the same or more likely smaller workforces • Sheer intensity of work during the working shift

  7. What is ‘lean’ production? • A raft of management practices derived from manufacturing, particularly motor industry • Womack et al (1990) ‘The Machine that Changed the World’ • Core thesis – organisations which strip out wasteful (or non-value added) processes from production gain significant quality and efficiency advantages • IMVP concluded that the successful co.s corresponded most to Toyota Lean Production Model, where – • - tasks and responsibilities were transferred to added value teams • - shifting detection of quality defects to teams • Team became the organisation form most associated with lean – so-called multi-skilling, task enlargement, worker participation in kaizen

  8. Lean counterposed to Taylorism would remove mind-numbing stress with ‘creative stress’, participation etc • Hence ‘work smarter, not harder’ mantra • But critics’ studies of workers’ experiences in autos and HMRC found systematic evidence of increased labour subordination • - tighter supervisory surveillance and control - narrow tasking • - greater job strain and stress - managerial bullying - lack of voice • - delayering and ‘management by stress’ • Womack and Jones (2003) argued that lean could be applied to service sector • Consultants and academics now applying efficiency savings to public sector, financial services, NHS etc. • Radnor report in HMRC etc.

  9. A brutalised form of Taylorism in HMRC • After lean... - 95% say ‘very’ or ‘quite’ pressurised • Volume, pace and intensity of work – hugely increased • ‘Lean has created a mechanistic, impersonal, targets driven, stats obsessed, highly pressurised working environment which has resulted in a demoralised, demotivated workforce’. (HMRC Worker, East Kilbride) • ‘After 27 years in the Inland Revenue following the introduction of lean, I am now deskilled, de-motivated [and] stressed-out most days, afraid to be sick, feel unappreciated, provide a poor service for customers, am not allowed to voice my opinion, looking forward to the day I can leave for good’. (HMRC Worker, Cardiff)

  10. Frequency of Symptoms/Complaints Pre- and Post-Lean

  11. What is Performance Management? • The measurement of performance as in output, number of tasks completed is central to management • The current purposes of PM being put are new • Performance Appraisal has existed for a long time – the individualisation of pay and conditions • Questionable link between effort and reward • PAs typically annually, 6-monthly and always there was a subjectivity problem - who decides? • Performance Management distinct from Appraisal • PM not periodic and retrospective but continuous forward looking and shift to disciplinary purpose • Various names – Performance Improvement, PIPs, Managing Performance, PIMs

  12. HRM textbooks urge PM to develop employees, Line Managers to be coaches, emphasise training etc. • Aligning individual objectives with organisation’s • In practice, increasingly the micro-measurement and micro-management of individual performance • Quantitative outputs and targets • Qualitative aspects – behaviours, attitudes, ‘delighting the customer’ etc – highly subjective • Often first identified in contact centres, targets now spreading beyond to diverse areas of work • Targets, KPIs, SLAs – determined at the top, ‘cascading down’ through tiers of managers, to Team Leaders and then to individual workers

  13. Lean, understaffing, PM, management by stress • If war of attrition then time/effort is the battleground • ‘Time is money’ – porosity of the working day • Call centres – 1 sec off each call saved BT £2m • Engineers - new technologies, tracking, mobile phones etc leading to intensification – save minutes • Fundamental driver is reduction in labour costs • As much or more work done with the same or less resource • Continuous pressure on so-called underperformers • The Bell Curve

  14. The Performance Management Bell Curve Meets expectations Below expectations Above expectations Excellent performance Serious under performance 10% 15% 50% 15% 10%

  15. Illegitimacy of forced or a priori distribution • Evidence of ‘managed exit’ irrespective of ‘actual’ performance • Common in FS companies from being put on a PIP to exit could be 6 weeks • In another FS company 750 on facing disciplinary action for underperformance • Compounded by tough Sickness Absence Policies • Yet ‘Sicknote Britain’ is a myth – statistical analysis • Both new procedures and harsh implementation of existing policies and procedures • Presenteeism rather absenteeism is the problem • Effects on health – intensity, pressure and stress

  16. The Vicious Circle

  17. What Can Be Done? • Trade unions play an indispensable role in protecting the health of their members • Employees should not be punished for a crisis they did not cause but encouraged to perform effectively without undue pressure • Unions conducting H&S and stress audits at work • Employer strategies using punitive PM and SAPs are short-termist and counter-productive • The Bell curve should be rejected as inapplicable to employee performance • Public exposure of the worst cases of ‘new tyranny in the contemporary workplace’ • Opportunities to organise, recruit, represent and resist • From individual representation to collective organisation

More Related