1 / 26

Occupational Disease Determination

Occupational Disease Determination. An Occupational Physician’s Perspective. Dennis Stumpp, MD, MS. Board certified, residency trained Occupational medicine Current Position Staff physician Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Services - Auburn 30 hours/week IME’s and consulting.

Download Presentation

Occupational Disease Determination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Occupational Disease Determination An Occupational Physician’s Perspective

  2. Dennis Stumpp, MD, MS • Board certified, residency trained Occupational medicine • Current Position • Staff physician Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Services - Auburn 30 hours/week • IME’s and consulting

  3. Legal Definitions RCW 51.08.100"Injury." • "Injury" means a sudden and tangible happening, of a traumatic nature, producing an immediate or prompt result, and occurring from without, and such physical conditions as result therefrom. RCW 51.08.140"Occupational disease." • "Occupational disease" means such disease or infection as arises naturally and proximately out of employment under the mandatory or elective adoption provisions of this title.

  4. Criteria For Allowance • Physician opinion more probable than not that work conditions are the cause of or have temporarily or permanently aggravated a pre-existing condition • Supporting objective medical findings • Arose naturally and proximately out of employment

  5. “Naturally” • A natural consequence of distinctive conditions of employment OR • A natural consequence of work conditions rather than conditions in everyday life or all employment in general OR • A natural consequence of conditions of employment rather than conditions occurring coincidentally in the workplace

  6. “Proximately” • There existed no intervening independent and sufficient cause for the disease so that the disease would not have been contracted but for the distinctive condition existing in the … employment • not required to be the only cause

  7. Statute of Limitations • Injury - 1 year from diagnosis • Disease - 2 years from diagnosis

  8. Categories of Occupational Disease • Cumulative trauma • Other musculoskeletal disorders • Dermatitis • Respiratory disease • Neurological disease • Other systemic disorders

  9. Cumulative trauma • Epidemiolologic controversy • Science v. administrative acceptance • Non work factors • Crossover with injuries • Discrete syndromes v. regional pain

  10. Epidemiologic controversy • Common in general population • lack of clear dose-response relationship • force, frequency, postures, vibration • Anthropometric variability • multifactorial causation

  11. Science v. administrative acceptance

  12. Non work factors • Sporting or hobby activities • Prior injury • Systemic disease • Psychosocial stressors

  13. Crossover with injuries • Acute strain v. repetetive trauma • Objective findings the same • Coding and Diagnosis • e.g. Wrist strain vs tendonitis

  14. Points of View • Injured worker • Employer • Attending Provider • Specialist • Claims manager

  15. Causal Inference • Qualitative plausibility • Quantitative plausibility • Temporal relationship • Elimination of alternative explanations

  16. Temporal Relationship • Exposure precedes disease • Symptoms occur in proper relationship to exposure • Acutely during exposure, disappearing after exposure ceases, better on evenings, weekends and holidays • Chronologicaly appropriate duration and latency period

  17. Qualitative Plausibility • Is the disease/symptoms consistent with the known toxic effects of the substance? • In the absence of adequate literature • Are there others similarly exposed experiencing the same disease • Does the offending substance share chemical or structural characteristics with other substances known to cause the disease

  18. Quantitative Plausibility • Was the exposure level sufficient to cause the disease? • Comparison of the individual’s exposure to published toxicology and epidemiology literature.

  19. Alternative causation • Is there a more likely or preferable explanation of causation? • Natural course of pre-existing disease • new disease onset of other cause • concurrent disease process resulting in some of symptoms • multifactorial cause

  20. Occupational Diseases • Acute vs. chronic exposure • Transient vs. cumulative exposure • Exposure often remote from disease • cumulative exposures - Cadmium, lead, asbestos • latency periods - Cancer, asbestosis

  21. Reconstruction of Exposure • Duration • Nature of agent • Controls • Intensity • Personal protective equipment • Engineering controls

  22. Sources of Information • Patient history • Medical Records - outside PMD’s, present and prior • Medical surveillance • MSDS’s • Industrial hygiene measurements • Human resources • Worksite walk through

  23. Epidemiology and Toxicology of Occupational Disease • Study Quality • Variety of Study Types • Animal v. human data • Similar type and route of exposure • Random variation • Bias • Statistical v. clinical significance

  24. Epidemiology Interpretation • Strength of Association • Consistency between studies and groups • Specificity - exposures and disease • Dose -Response relationship • Coherence and Plausibility • Temporality

  25. Prospective Cohort Retrospective Cohort Case Control Cross Sectional Ecological Study Proportionate Mortality Consecutive Case Series Case Reports Single Case Report Study Design Pyramid Relative Value

More Related