1 / 8

Competition Dynamics Introduction

Competition Dynamics Introduction. HHL kommentar. Var inte alltför formell och krävande. Tanken på att diskutera tolkning och ekonomisk teori utifrån ett fall är god. Kanske kan ett bättre fall än Ryan Air identifieras. Föreläsning behöver utvecklas och underbyggas.

reece
Download Presentation

Competition Dynamics Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Competition Dynamics Introduction HHL kommentar. Var inte alltför formell och krävande. Tanken på att diskutera tolkning och ekonomisk teori utifrån ett fall är god. Kanske kan ett bättre fall än Ryan Air identifieras. Föreläsningbehöverutvecklasochunderbyggas

  2. Introduction Competition Dynamics 2013 • Presentation HHL, JP and the class • Overall purpose • Course Syllabus • Schedule • Reading and legislative material • Individual assignments • Group assignments at Field Trips and in case reporting • Break and think about Ryan Air

  3. Competition and IPR – which is more important Competition at all levels (2012) • The Trademark course in a nutshell. Summary. Does TM cause an antitrust problem? Can a TM create a dominant position. What is the significance of other IPRs. Does the monopoly position create competition problems. Is there a tension between IPRs and a free market? • Brief recap of the Competition Course. What kind of competition are we primarily discussing in early case law? Is it a question of preventing activities that deviate from the ordinary norm as they may be harmful. Is this creating a more or less static situation where the purpose is lower prices and thereby consumer welfare. How important is this type of competition for economic development? • Economists are clearly changing the optic and promoting dynamic competition. Innovation and new development is now regarded as promoting economic development more than the traditional competition approach. What is the meaning and difference compared to static competition? How does it impact on the relationship between IPR and Competition Law?

  4. Interpretation methods (2013) • Ryan Air • Case presentation strategy: (Facts and context, claims, legal grounds; court discussion, judgment, reflection on importance)? • To what extent is Ryan Air an expression of textual or a purposive legal analysis or perhaps even a dynamic interpretation? • Let´s jointly take a deeper look at the economic arguments to see if we understand and agree.

  5. Economic schools • Ryan Air - consider why and how Ryan Air would have been decided if it was an expression of • OrdoLiberalistic thinking; • Harvard school economics; • Chicago school economics; • Post Chicago school economics; • Transaction economics;

  6. Issues in an Innovation market approach • (1) How do market power and regulatory activities affect a dynamic development? Can you measure innovation at all? • (2) What are the driving forces underlying dynamic competition? If innovation is important, how do you measure it? • (3) Network effects? • (4) How about dynamic competition and welfare gains and economic growth? • (5) How about dynamic effects in the pharma industry? • (6) Major differences between traditional industry, information technology and pharmaceutical development? • (7) Can we agree with the 6 conclusions drawn by Ahn?

  7. Modernization • How does EU modernization economics distinguish itself? • How is the economic reasoning coming through in regulations and guidelines?

  8. Next class • Reading assignment Chapter 2 • Gr. 1 * • Gr. 2 * • Gr. 3 * • Gr. 4 * • Preparations for next week according to assignment.   • Individual assignment. Licensing seminar next Monday. Be sure to get a firm grip on your subject. Identify initial sources and consider your exact purpose – preferably presented in a problematical way. • [Group assignment. Meet and discuss how you intend to approach the negotiation. Group 1 and 3 Swedish Licensor and 2 and 4 French licensee. 1/3 and 2/4 shall decide on a schedule for negotiations, drafting and review of the agreement leading to an agreement before winter brake. ]

More Related