the physiology of fencing
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
The Physiology of Fencing

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 7

The Physiology of Fencing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 163 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Physiology of Fencing. Phoebe Camilletti ESS 110.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Physiology of Fencing' - redford


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the physiology of fencing

The Physiology of Fencing

Phoebe Camilletti

ESS 110

slide2

“A touch of imagination and instead of working on the strip of the Salle, masked and padded, the sword tip blunted, you are standing, naked to the waist in some glade, facing an opponent with a deadly weapon in hand. Only one of you will leave the scene. Even to think of this in a friendly pick-up bout is to make your work ten times more cautious, your determination to touch and not be touched a hundred-fold more intense, a thousand times more enjoyable. I never fence without conditioning myself to believe that if I am careless, my punishment will be a slit forearm, or a blade through my lungs” (Gallico, 2005).

fitness demands
Fitness Demands

My Musings

ASEP Findings

  • Indeed, fencing is a sport that is 80% anaerobic.
  • Softball and baseball are too (Reilly, 1990).
areas of discrepancy
Areas of Discrepancy
  • AEROBIC PROMINENCE

-“The maximal oxygen uptake as a measure of cardiorespiratoryfitness measurements: 51 ml.kg-1.min-1 in college champions to 67 ml.kg-1.min-1 in world class fencers.” (Harmenberg, J.)

-differences between weapons/styles

  • SPEED

-differences between weapons/styles

-no studies have really concluded that there is a “correlation between speed or accuracy of fencing motion and success” (Harmenberg, J.).

-psychological factors

areas of discrepancy5
Areas of Discrepancy
  • STRENGTH

-needed for explosive lunge; quick retreat; deep en garde—vary between weapons/styles

-“Fencers show a greater cross-sectional area (CS A) of the dominant forearm, arm, thigh, and calf, which are independent of technical level and years of training.” (Roi, 2008).

-overuse injuries; primary and secondary prevention

conclusion
Conclusion

The ASEP findings are more accurate, but they cannot fully account for the subjectivity that evaluating the range of fencing styles involves.

references
References
  • Aldo, Nadi. (1943). Nadi on Fencing. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
  • Harmenberg, J. & Ceci, R. “Fencing: Biomedical and Psychological Factors.” Department of Virology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control.

<http://www.sportsci.org/encyc/drafts/Fencing.doc.>.

  • Martens, R. (2004). Successful Coaching. Hong Kong: Human Kinetics.
  • Reilly, T. (1990). The Physiology of Sports. Taylor & Francis.
  • Roi G.S. & Bianchedi D. (2008). “The Science of Fencing: Implications for Performance and Injury Prevention.” Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 38 (6), 465-81.
ad