An Introduction to X-ray Astronomy

1. Keith Arnaud NASA Goddard University of Maryland An Introduction to X-ray Astronomy X-ray Astronomy School 2007

2. X-ray school team Keith Arnaud GSFC/UMD Ilana Harrus GSFC/JHU (expecting a baby) Aneta Siemiginowska CXC (flying from Poland) Randall Smith GSFC/JHU Liz Galle CXC Lisa Winter GSFC/UMD Sandy Barnes GSFC Bill Parke GWU Ali Eskandarian GWU X-ray Astronomy School 2007

3. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 What is X-ray Astronomy ? Astronomy using photons with energies: • > the photoelectric cut-off due to intervening hydrogen • < a few 100 keV • Astronomy using photons from processes involving energetic or inner-shell electrons. • Whatever X-ray astronomers do.

4. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Characteristics of X-ray Astronomy • The atmosphere is opaque to X-rays so astronomy is done using satellites, rockets, and, at the highest energies only, balloons. So : • Our detectors have to work right the first time - we can’t go and fix them. Any problems have to be understood remotely and calibrated. • X-ray astronomy experiments are (very) expensive so there aren’t many and public data archives are very important.

5. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 X-ray Processes • X-rays are produced in hot and violent processes. Almost all point-like X-ray sources are variable - some extremely variable. This has two important consequences : • Monitoring observations are more important in the X-ray band than any other. • There are few good calibration sources. • The X-ray band includes the K-shell transitions (ie n=2 to 1) of all elements heavier than He. The continuum shape also provides important clues to the emission processes.

6. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 X-rays from the Sun The first astronomical X-ray experiments were performed in the US in1948 and 1949 using captured WWII V2 rockets. X-rays were detected from the Solar corona by Herb Friedman and collaborators at the US Naval Research Lab (in Washington DC). It is still not fully understood how the corona is heated to X-ray emitting temperatures.

7. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 How to win a Nobel prize The breakthrough experiment was performed in 1962 by Bruno Rossi, Riccardo Giacconi, and collaborators at American Science and Engineering (AS&E) in Cambridge, MA. After two failures of the Aerobee rocket, they successfully launched a detector to look for X-ray emission from the moon. As the rocket spun the field-of-view passed over an unexpectedly bright X-ray source. This was designated Scorpius X-1. A follow-up campaign identified the X-ray source as a binary with a compact (neutron star) primary. Further rocket experiments in the 1960s found other X-ray binaries as well as identifying X-ray emission from several SNR, from M87, Cygnus-A and the Coma cluster of galaxies.

8. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 The First Extra-Solar X-ray Detection Giacconi et al., 1962 Sco X-1 X-ray background

9. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Riccardo Giacconi receives 2002 Physics Nobel Prize from King of Sweden

10. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 All-Sky Surveys The satellite experiments Uhuru (US) and Ariel-V (UK) performed the first all-sky surveys. These used collimated proportional counters with resolutions of degrees so the images of the sky were necessarily crude. However, these surveys detected many galactic binaries, SNR, clusters of galaxies, and active galactic nuclei. HEAO-1 (US) performed a more sensitive sky survey and made a precise measurement of the intensity and shape of the X-ray background (XRB). There was a long debate about whether the XRB was due to hot gas distributed through the universe or was the sum of many lower flux point sources. The latter is now known to be the case although it is still an interesting question whether the XRB can be completely explained by the sum of individual sources.(Dan Schwartz was PI of the A3 experiment)

11. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Uhuru (“Freedom”)‏ Bruno Rossi Marjorie Townsend

12. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Hot gas in the Perseus Cluster

13. X-ray Astronomy School 2007

14. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 X-ray Telescopes X-ray focussing optics were used first to observe the Solar corona and then transferred to general astronomy with HEAO-2 (US), launched in 1978 and renamed the Einstein Observatory. The telescope imaged X-rays in the energy range 0.5-4.0 keV. Many classes of astronomical objects were detected in X-rays.This was the first X-ray astronomy mission with a guest observer program and a “public archive” (which I used for my PhD thesis). Its successor, over a decade later, was ROSAT (Germany-US-UK), which performed an all-sky imaging survey in the 0.2-2.5 keV range followed by longer pointed observations at specific targets. This generated a vast public database (which still has lots of potential) - and is a fertile source of targets for Chandra and XMM-Newton.

15. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 EinsteinObservatory

16. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 X-ray Detection of the Moon ROSAT PSPC

17. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Large proportional counter arrays Parallel with the development of X-ray telescopes were missions designed to collect large numbers of X-rays from relatively bright sources to perform detailed spectroscopic and timing investigations. EXOSAT (ESA) was launched in 1983 into a deep orbit which allowed long continuous observations. It discovered Quasi Periodic Oscillations in X-ray binaries. Ginga (Japan-UK) was Japan’s third X-ray astronomy satellite and was launched in 1987. Important results were on Black Hole Transients and the detection of Fe lines and Compton reflection in active galactic nuclei.

18. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 EXOSAT lightcurve

19. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 The current culmination of this line is the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), launched at the end of 1995 and still operating, which has detected kHz oscillations in Galactic binary sources providing possible tests of GR effects in the vicinity of neutron stars and black holes. RXTE also carries an all-sky monitor which has produced long-term lightcurves for the brighter sources.

20. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 High-throughput telescopes ASCA (Japan-US), launched in 1993, used high-throughput but relatively coarse resolution telescopes that operated in the energy range 0.5-10 keV. The importance of these telescopes was less in the imaging and more in reducing the background - which usually scales with the volume of the detector in space experiments. ASCA detected broad (100,000 km/s) Fe lines from close to the black hole in active galactic nuclei. BeppoSAX (Italy-Netherlands), launched in 1996, covered a very wide bandpass (0.1-300 keV) using a range of instruments. Its most important result was the discovery of gamma-ray burst afterglows.

21. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 ASCA observations of Fe K lines in AGN

22. Queen Victoria Brian May Paul Nandra hh Photo credit: BBC News

23. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Beppo-SAX detection of GRB afterglow

24. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Great Observatories This brings us up to the present and the two major X-ray astronomy facilities launched in 1999 - Chandra and XMM-Newton. Chandra boasts the best (and most expensive) telescope ever built, giving a sub-arcsecond resolution. Imaging is provided by CCD and microchannel plate imagers. High resolution spectroscopy by two gratings that can be placed in the optical path behind the mirrors. While Chandra is a successor to ROSAT, XMM-Newton follows the path of ASCA in providing greater mirror area but at lower angular resolution. XMM-Newton has 3 mirrors, 2 of which have reflection gratings, providing simultaneous high resolution spectroscopy and imaging. There is also an optical monitor telescope.

25. X-ray Astronomy School 2007

26. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 • $250 million worth of precision optics. The best telescope every built. A resolution of 0.5 arcseconds. Can be used with one of : • ACIS - imaging CCD spectrometer with 10 chips. For best spectroscopy of small objects use S3. For best imaging over large fields use I0-I3. • HRC - imaging channel multiplier. Produces highest spatial resolution images. Also best time resolution (but be careful). • HETG - pair of gratings dispersing a spectrum onto ACIS. • High resolution spectroscopy of small sources for E > 1 keV. • LETG - grating dispersing spectrum onto HRC or ACIS. • High resolution spectroscopy of small sources for E < 1 keV. Used with HRC to get to lowest energies (longest wavelengths) but then there is no order-separation.

27. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 XMM-Newton

28. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 • Three X-ray telescopes and one optical/UV telescope giving large effective area and simultaneous observations. • EPIC - two MOS and one PN CCD spectrometers with 7 and 2 chips respectively. PN has better efficiency at high energies. • RGS - two gratings dispersing spectrum onto 8 MOS chips. Each RGS intercepts 50% of the X-rays passing through its telescope. • OM - 30cm optical/UV telescope with filter set and two grisms. • Generally underused. Limiting sensitivity B=24.

29. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Chandra view of the Galactic center Wang et al.

30. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Chandra vs. XMM-Newton • Chandra is best for… • Anything requiring better than 5 arcseconds spatial resolution. • High resolution spectroscopy for energies < 0.5 or > 2 keV. • XMM-Newton is best for… • Imaging or imaging-spectroscopy which does not require a resolution of 5 arcseconds or better. • High resolution spectroscopy for energies 0.5 < E < 2 keV. • High resolution spectroscopy on extended objects that are larger than 10 arcseconds and smaller than 1 arcminute.

31. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Swift Gamma-ray burst mission with wide-field hard X-ray detector (BAT), X-ray telescope with CCD detector (XRT), and optical/UV telescope (UVOT). While primarily chasing GRBs, Swift is also observing other sources as time is available. The X-ray telescope has a resolution similar to that of XMM-Newton. The CCD is similar to the EPIC-MOS. The UVOT is a copy of the Optical Monitor on XMM-Newton. The wide-field detector is producing an all-sky survey in hard X-rays (> 10 keV).

32. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Suzaku Japan-US collaborative satellite. Primary instrument was the XRS - a cryogenic high resolution spectroscopy detector. However it suffered catastrophic loss of He and is no longer operating. Also includes four X-ray telescopes with CCD detectors (XIS) and a hard X-ray detector (HXD). The XIS has lower background than ACIS or EPIC so is good for low surface brightness sources. The XIS-HXD combination is good for accretion sources (XRBs and AGN) giving a spectrum from 0.5 - 50 keV.

33. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Spatial Resolution Effective Area Bandwidth Sky Coverage Effective Area Effective Area Chandra Suzaku ROSAT XMM XMM Swift Spectral Resolution Suzaku Swift Chandra ASCA ASCA SAX SAX ROSAT RXTE RXTE Effective Area ROSAT SAX Suzaku RXTE RXTE Swift Swift XMM Chandra ASCA SAX Suzaku XMM ROSAT Chandra ASCA

34. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 40 years of X-ray astronomy have provided a billion times improvement in sensitivity and a quarter of a million times improvement in angular resolution.

35. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Whither X-ray astronomy ? Chandra and XMM-Newton have lifetimes limited by funding. Other missions are under development : AstroSat – India 2008 HXMT - China 2010 Spectrum-X-gamma/ERosita – Russia/Germany 2011 NeXT – Japan 2013 Possible US Small Explorer 2012-2013

36. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Longer term Both NASA (Constellation-X) and ESA (XEUS) have long-term plans for expensive missions featuring large effective areas and high spectral resolutions. These are at least a decade away.

37. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 X-ray data X-ray detectors arephoton-countingin contrast to those in most other wavebands which measure incoming flux. In consequence, basic X-ray data usually comprise lists of events and their attributes. X-ray datasets are usuallyphoton-limited, particularly for newer missions such as Chandra and XMM-Newton. Images, spectra, and lightcurves created from the event lists may well have a few or even no photons in many bins. The data analysis techniques (and statistics) developed in other wavebands may not transfer to X-ray astronomy.

38. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 X-ray data II The basic data file usually comprises time-tagged events, each with a position (in detector and sky coordinates) and an energy (often called channel, PHA or PI for historical reasons). Thus each event can be thought of as occupying a position in a 4-D space. The event may have other attributes of interest - eg for CCDs the pattern of pixels from which the charge for this event was accumulated. It is often possible to increase S/N by selecting on these secondary attributes. After filtering the events as required we project them onto 1-D or 2-D subspaces and bin them up to give images, energy spectra, or lightcurves (time series).

39. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 X-ray data III • Each of these binned datasets requires its own calibration products. • Image analysis uses : • exposure maps - the mirror and detector sensitivity across the field-of-view (taking into account any changes in aspect ie pointing direction). • point spread function (PSF) - the probability that a photon of given energy and position is registered in a given image pixel. • Energy spectral analysis uses : • response matrices - the probability that a photon of given energy is registered in a given channel.

40. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 The 3 Most Important Things for X-ray Data Analysis are : • Calibration

41. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 The 3 Most Important Things for X-ray Data Analysis are : • Calibration • Calibration

42. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 The 3 Most Important Things for X-ray Data Analysis are : • Calibration • Calibration • Calibration • (The rest is “just” software, organization, and analysis.)‏

43. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 The Calibration is Never Good Enough There is always a systematic error term associated with your data analysis. If you have the misfortune to have very high S/N then this systematic term may dominate. You usually can’t add the systematics in quadrature to the statistical uncertainties because the systematic uncertainties are usually correlated. Don’t over interpret data without thinking very hard about the quality of the calibration !

44. X-ray Astronomy School 2007 Thank You