slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
P and T violating correlation in muon and beta decays

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 39

P and T violating correlation in muon and beta decays - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 83 Views
  • Uploaded on

P and T violating correlation in muon and beta decays. Oscar Naviliat-Cuncic LPC-Caen (IN2P3/CNRS-ENSI) and Université de Caen Basse-Normandie. context and plan. describe some searches for signatures of NP in weak decays, specifically sensitive to P and/or T violation.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' P and T violating correlation in muon and beta decays' - ray-gilliam


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
p and t violating correlation in muon and beta decays

P and T violating correlationin muon and beta decays

Oscar Naviliat-Cuncic

LPC-Caen (IN2P3/CNRS-ENSI) and

Université de Caen Basse-Normandie

context and plan
context and plan

describe some searches for signatures of NP in weak decays, specifically sensitive to P and/or T violation

  • CP-even, P-odd correlation (muon decay)
  • CP-odd, P-odd correlation (neutron decay)
1 the longitudinal e polarization in polarized muon decay
1. The longitudinal e+ polarizationin polarized muon decay

(initially motivated by the sensitivity of P -/P + measurements in nuclear beta decay)

m decay phenomenology

nm

ne

GF

m

e

  • beyond SM: include all Lorentz invariants
  • decay amplitude parametrized by
  • in the SM (all others are zero)
m-decay phenomenology

4-fermions point-like interaction:

(W.Fetscher PLB 173(86)102)

g = S,V,T interactions

e,m = L,R helicity of charged fermions

parameterization of observables
parameterization of observables

Observables commonly expressed in terms of Michel parameters:

status

the parameter x’’ enters the angular/energy dependence of PL by the combination:

(present PDG value)

longitudinal e polarization

q

PL

Pm

e+

m+

longitudinal e+ polarization

sensitivity vs x and q for Pm = 0.95

x = Ee /E0 reduced positron energy

→ measure near q = p and x = 1

relation to exotic couplings

relative measurement
relative measurement

compare e+ polarizations between polarized and unpolarized muons:

avoids the precise determination of the polarimeter analyzing power

sensitivity coefficient:

r -, r 0: rates of positrons incident on the polarimeter

for polarized and unpolarized muon decays (measured)

implementation

  • produce polarized muons
  • maintain/destroy the muon polarization
  • select backward emitted positrons near the end point
  • measure the longitudinal polarization
realization
realization

pE3 area

muons are naturally produced 100%

polarized from pion decay at rest

“surface muons”

(contamineted by “cloud muons”)

experimental setup

28.9 MeV/c m+

> 44 MeV/c e+

Spectrometer

Polarimeter

Wien filter

(B < 0.0004 T)

monitor

telescopes

Al or S

target

experimental setup

e+/m+ velocity separation

N(e+)/N(m+) < 0.12

m stop rate: 3x107 s-1 at 1.6 mA

muon polarization
muon polarization

Hanle method

(with two plastic telescopes)

polarization vs muon momentum

“surface muons”

at 28.5 MeV/c: Pm = 0.94(1)

use two muon stop targets:

Al: Pm = 0.94 “polarized”

S: Pm = 0.10 “unpolarized”

energy and angular selection

1.9T 2.7T 0.8T

energy and angular selection

selector tracker refocus

pe = 50 MeV/c

60% transmission

for Ee > 44 MeV

12 < q < 13

dump of beam positons

pe = 29 MeV/c

silicon tracker

1

2

3

2

e+

1

z

3

d12

d23

silicon tracker

determine momentum from helix geometry

redundancy constraint!

- 3 planes with 4 detectors each

- 60x60 double SSD 1 mm pitch 300 mm thick

resolution Dpe = 1.15(1) MeV/c

positron polarimeter

Hodoscope

WC

BGO

WC

scintillator

Vacoflux foils with opposite

magnetization

positron polarimeter

use two processes:

- Bhabha scattering

- Annihilation in flight

(have analyzing powers with opposite signs)

BHA: Aeff ~ 0.037

AIF: Aeff ~ -0.015

(incl. fraction of polarized electrons and foil orientation)

but similar FOM (luminosity)

CoNiFe foils: 75x15x0.1 cm3 with 0.75mm active region to reduce Brehmstralung events

hodoscope and calorimeter
hodoscope and calorimeter
  • 7x7 plastic scintillators (x and y)
  • 90x7 cm2 with single PM readout
  • 127 BGO crystals, 55mm diam, 20cm long
  • external magnetic shielding
  • temperture stabilized DT = ±2°
  • resolution DE/E = 10% at 42 MeV
measuring conditions
measuring conditions
  • two magnetized foils with opposite magnetizations (simultaneous)
  • two directions of magnetization for each foil
  • two orientations of the polarimeter: +45°, -45°
  • two analyzing processes with opposite analyzing powers (BHA, AIF)
  • two stop targets for polarized and unpolarized muons
  • measure energy dependence of the longitudinal polarization

typical trigger rates:

  • total 15 kHz
  • AIF 60/s
  • BHA 250/s

(consistent with MC simulations)

cluster recognition event reconstruction cuts ratios asymmetries
cluster recognition, event reconstruction,cuts, ratios, asymmetries…
  • triggers defined from scintillators and BGO
  • SSD readout is slave
  • event type sorted from hits in MWPCs, Hodoscope and BGO
preliminary results
preliminary results

(X. Morelle, PhD)

asymmetries of ratios under inversion of foils magnetization

PRELIMINARY!

x” = 1.020 ± (0.062)stat ± (…)sys

(factor of 6 improvement if sys remains negligible)

status
status
  • experiment did not acquired the planned statistics
  • no present plans to make a new run
people and institutions
people and institutions

J.Egger, N.Danneberg, J.Deusch, W.Fetscher, F.Foroughi, J.Govaerts, M.Hadri, Ch.Hilbes, K.Kirch, P.Knowles, K.Koehler, A.Kozela, J.Lang, M.Markiewicz, R.Medve, X.Morelle, O.Naviliat-Cuncic, A.Ninane, R.Prieels, L.Simons, J.Sromicki and P.Van Hove

  • Institut de Physique Nucléaire, UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • Institut für Teilchenphysik, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Paul Scherrer Institut, PSI, Villigen, Switzerland
  • Département de Physique, Uni-Fribourg, Switzerland
  • Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Caen, France

(thanks to R.Prieels)

related projects
related projects

TRIUMF Weak Interaction Symmetry Test: “TWIST”

http://twist.triumf.ca/~e614/experiment.html

tracking of e+ from polarized muon decay

goal: detemine r, d, Pmx with a relative precision at the 10-4 level

prelim. results expected in 2004

the r coefficient

Jn

Pp

e

pe

p

the R coefficient

decay rate function:

  • the coefficients A, R, N, … probe the dynamics
  • JTW parameterization: Ci , C’i(i = S, V, A, T )
r and d in neutron decay
R and D in neutron decay

D: P-even T-odd R: P-odd T-odd

DFSI = 1.310-5 (10-6) RFSI = 910-4 (510-6)

measuring principle

Jn

Pp

e

pe

p

measuring principle

highest sensitivity to R for mutually perpendicular vectors

Mott scattering

experimental concept
experimental concept

(J. Sromicki NIM A 440 (2000) 609)

  • produce polarized cold neutron beam
  • observe neutron decay in flight
  • track low energy decay electrons
  • use large angle Mott scattering
  • trigger with “opposite” scintillator
realization1
realization
  • Spallation neutron source SINQ
  • target: “zircalloy” (Zr-Pb)
  • D2O moderator
  • liquid D2 vessel cold source

FUNSPIN area

polarized cold neutron beam
polarized cold neutron beam
  • A. Schebetov et al.
  • NIM A 497 (2003) 479
  • J. Zejma et al.
  • to be submitted to NIM A
  • flux: 2×108 /(cm2·s·mA)
  • ‹P› ≈ 97 %

FUNSPIN area

photo gallery
photo gallery

MWPC

HODOSCOPE

DECAY REGION

results from commissioning run
results from commissioning run
  • Energy spectra of electrons from single track events

S/B > 3:1

mott scattering analysis
Mott scattering analysis

cross section and Sherman function in Au

… Pb is better (higher Z) and cheaper!

- 1mm evaporated Pb layer on 2mm mylar

- 2 or 3 bands for 50x50cm2 active surface

vertex reconstruction
vertex reconstruction

(A. Kozela)

positions of Pb scattering foils

vertex signals
vertex signals
  • after vertex reconstruction with VETO condition on
  • the hodoscope at the vertex side S/B > 10:1
  • inclusion of hot spots of the setup geometry is in
  • progress to further improve S/B
comments
comments

2. precision goal:R =510-3

1. polarimetry control

  • “up-down” asymmetry probes R
  • “left-right” asymmetry probes N

the simultaneous measurement of N ≠ 0 provides a control of the polarimeter

Exclusion plot on S and T frombeta decay experiments (±1s)

interpretation
interpretation

P. Herczeg 2004: constraints on |Im(aLS)| from Rp are hard to beat with Rn

Rn at 10-2 would require fine-tuned cancellations

→ make life less exciting…

… important considerations for new generation experiments

status and outlook
status and outlook
  • The Mott polarimeter for the measurement of R in neutron decay
  • is complete.
  • The commissioning run in autumn 2003 was successful.
  • The first data taking run starts next month.
  • The measurement of R with an accuracy of 10-2 is expected to be achieved within one year.
  • The sensitivity goal of 510-3 seems feasible;
  • will be checked after first complete data analysis.
people institutions support
people, institutions, support

G.Ban, M.Beck, A.Bialek, K.Bodek, T.Brys, A.Czarnecki, W.Fetscher, P.Gorel, K.Kirch, St.Kistryn, A.Kozela, A.Lindroth, O.Naviliat-Cuncic, J.Pulut, A.Serebrov, N.Severijns, E.Stephan and J.Zejma

  • Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Caen
  • Institute of Physics, Jegellonian University, Cracow
  • Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow
  • University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • St Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina
  • University of Silesia, Katowice
  • Catholic University Leuven, Leuven
  • Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen
  • Institute of Particle Physics, ETH Zurich

support for PhD students

(thanks to K. Bodek and P. Gorel)

ad