1 / 38

Wisconsin Mycobacteriology Laboratory Network Conference

Wisconsin Mycobacteriology Laboratory Network Conference. Tuesday, October 15, 2013. PRE-EXTENSIVELY DRUG RESISTANT (XDR) TB IN WISCONSIN. Marathon County Population 134,700 1,545 square miles Marathon County Health Department 53 employees Tuberculosis in Marathon County

raquel
Download Presentation

Wisconsin Mycobacteriology Laboratory Network Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wisconsin Mycobacteriology Laboratory Network Conference Tuesday, October 15, 2013

  2. PRE-EXTENSIVELY DRUG RESISTANT (XDR) TB IN WISCONSIN • Marathon County • Population 134,700 • 1,545 square miles • Marathon County Health Department • 53 employees • Tuberculosis in Marathon County • 1-3 active annual cases • Case “Resilience”

  3. PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION • To educate and collaborate with other professionals about my role as a public health tuberculosis case manager. Training Objectives • To increase participant knowledge of public health nurse case management role. • To tell a story and give a voice to Resilience. • To collaborate with my colleagues by answering questions and sharing knowledge & experiences.

  4. TB CASE MANAGEMENT • The primary goals of TB case management are to render the client non-infectious by ensuring appropriate treatment, prevent additional transmission and development of additional disease, identify and remove barriers to adherence, and identify and address other urgent health needs. • The health department role includes case management, contact investigation, determination of infectiousness (including release from isolation and return to normal activity/locations), and oversight of treatment plan and outcome.

  5. WHY RESILIENCE & NOT RESISTANCE? • “Being resilient doesn’t mean going through life without experiencing stress and pain. People feel grief, sadness, and a range of other emotions after adversity and loss. The road to resilience lies in working through the emotions and effects of stress and painful events.” • Resilience defined: “We all experience adversity, from everyday changes and challenges to serious losses. Fortunately, people are able to adapt.” • Source: http://www.pbs.org/thisemotionallife/topic/resilience/what-resilience

  6. MEET RESILIENCE? • Resilience is a 69 year old Asian female living in Marathon County with limited resources. • Birthplace: Laos • Family: Eldest of 7 children • Occupation: Farmer • Spouse and Children

  7. HARDSHIP AND CHANGE • Immigrated to the United States in 1990

  8. THE CHAIN OF INFECTION • Resilience visited a granddaughter for 1-2 weeks in March 2012. The father-in-law to this granddaughter was diagnosed with active TB. Resilience reported she was not screened for TB as she had only a small amount of exposure and no symptoms.

  9. RESILIENCE’S STORY, CONT. April 2012 - Living with and “Uncle & his wife and 4 children in Wausau for 6 months.” June 18th, 2012 - Resilience was diagnosed with right upper lobe pneumonia and put on Azithromycin. November 2012 -Follow-up chest x-ray showed improvement but not complete resolution of the infiltrate. - Resilience traveled to California via plane to stay with family. She had developed a cough and night sweats. - TST performed came back negative. No follow up or additional testing performed. February 2013 - Resilience lived on her own in 2 different apartments in Marathon County since her return from California.

  10. TIMELINE • June 18, 2012 – 1st MD Office Visit • Shortness of breath with minimal exertion • Abnormal chest X-ray (patchy and linear opacity projecting over the right upper lobe, which was new from prior exam from 01/18/2004) • No fever, cough, or chills • June 19, 2012 – treated with a Z-Pak • July 31, 2012 – 2nd MD Office Visit • Continued shortness of breath with exertion • Chest X-ray ordered, but not followed up on

  11. TIMELINE, CONT. • November 15, 2012 – 3rd MD Office Visit • Right breast pain x1 week • Repeat chest X-ray, which was abnormal (mild persistent infiltrate in the right upper lobe, which does not seem as prominent as on the prior exam [06/18/2012]) • Another Z-Pak ordered • April 19, 2013 – 4th MD Office Visit • Seen for elevated blood pressure • Another Z-Pak ordered

  12. Timeline, cont. • July 1, 2013 – Seen in Urgent Care • Reports history of headache and cough, both which have been ongoing for a long time, with occasional productive cough • Chest X-ray, which was abnormal (right upper lobe segmental consolidation, suspected malignancy; suggested CT scan) • Sputum samples ordered for fungus, etc. • Primary provider follow-up suggested • July 9, 2013 – 5th MD Office Visit • Chronic cough and non-responsive to antibiotics. Fever, chills, body aches, general malaise, productive cough • Started on Levofloxacin

  13. Timeline, cont. • July 11, 2013 – CT Scan • Significantly abnormal CT Scan (fairly extensive area of opacity involving the anterior segment of the right upper lobe) • “TB cannot be excluded” • July 19, 2013 – Pulmonary Consult • Everything completed in a negative pressure room. • Positive QuantiFERON test

  14. Timeline, cont. • July 22, 2013 – Health Department Notified • Diagnostic & Treatment Center positive smears on 07/18/13 & 07/19/2013 • Client placed in isolation by Health Department • Education provided, sputum samples collected & labs • Consulted with grandchildren, masks provided • Contact investigation started • July 25, 2013 – Removed from Isolation “A patient can be presumed to have an infection with non-tuberculosis mycobacteria pending culture results, if a second specimen is smear positive and PCR negative.”

  15. Definitions • Multi-drug resistant (MDR): • TB that is resistant to at least INH and Rifampin • Extensively drug resistant (XDR): • TB that is MDR • Also resistant to any fluoroquinolone and at least one of three injectable second-line drugs (i.e., amikacin, kanamycin, or capreomycin). • Pre XDR-TB?

  16. Pre XDR-TB TB disease caused by a TB strain resistant to isoniazid and rifampin and either a fluoroquinolone or a second-line injectable drug, but not both.

  17. WLSH Testing • Initial specimens received at WSLH • Referred smear POS specimen submitted from Diagnostic and Treatment Center in Weston. • Sputum specimen (DOC: 7/19/13) • 3+ smear POS at DTC • PCR negative at WSLH • Primary specimen also submitted at same time • Sputum. • Smear POS @WSLH (1-9/oil immersion field) • PCR negative

  18. Culture POSITIVE • 4th Sputum specimen collected on 7/23/13 • SMEAR NEGATIVE at WLSH • MGIT tube is POS on 8/12/13 • HPLC shows M. tuberculosis Complex

  19. Laboratory Testing

  20. Lab Testing #2

  21. MDDR Testing @ CDC • 13mm4121 • M. tuberculosis Complex reported on 8/14/13. • Sent to CDC on 8/16/13 • MDDR result received on 8/20/13

  22. MDDR Testing @ CDC • Resistant to: • Rifampin • INH • Ethambutol • Kanamycin

  23. MDDR Testing @ CDC • Cannot rule out resistance • PZA (Mutation detected) • Fluoroquinolone • Other injectable drugs

  24. Phenotypic DST testing • Began in-house • Problematic due to presence of M. gordonae in specimen • IIRE results pending • CDC: Agar proportion testing • First and second line drugs

  25. CDC Agar Proportion results • Resistance detected: • Isoniazid 0.2/1.0/5.0 µg/ml • Rifampin 1.0 µg/ml • Ethambutol 5.0 µg/ml • Streptomycin 2.0/10.0 µg/ml • Rifabutin 2.0 µg/ml • Kanamycin 5.0 µg/ml • Capreomycin 10.0 µg/ml • Amikacin 4.0 µg/ml

  26. CDC Agar Proportion results #2 • Susceptible • Ciprofloxacin 2.0 µg/ml • Ethionamide 10.0 µg/ml • PAS 2.0 µg/ml • Ofloxacin 2.0 µg/ml

  27. Other DST • National Jewish Hospital in Denver • MICs on individual drugs • Linezolid • Moxifloxacin • Cycloserine • Imipenem • Azithromycin • Clarithromycin

  28. Timeline, cont. • August 16, 2013 – Placed back into Isolation • Positive sputum culture collected on 07/23/2013 showing Microbacterium Tuberculosis complex (WSLH specimen number 13MM4121). • September 1, 2013 – Emergency Room Visit • Ambulance • Provider & Hospital • No family in the area • Concerns about isolation • Negative pressure room

  29. Timeline, cont. • September 6, 2013 – Program Manager Visit • Concerns about isolation • Nursing home? • Clan/Family • Health Department 4 visits/day x1 week, 3 visits/day ongoing; isolation surveillance checks • Family member to stay with client in the evening • September 9, 2013 – 6th MD Visit • In negative pressure room • MD against nursing home placement

  30. Timeline, cont. • October 4, 2013 – 7th MD Visit • Client with increased back and leg pain. • Flu shot provided • October 16, 2013 - Update • Isolation Compliance improved • Judicare • Energy Assistance • Stable at home waiting for treatment plan and then ID will do a direct admit so a line can be placed and treatment started in the hospital.

  31. TIMELINE SUMMARY • Total Primary Provider Visits: 5 • X-Rays: 4 • 06/2012 – 07/2013 before TB was suspected

  32. CONTACT INVESTIGATION • Home Care employees tested 8/20 (2 adults) • Neighbor tested 8/22 (2 adults) • Wausau Family tested 8/23 negative (4 adults and 1 child) • Wausau Family tested 8/28 negative (2 adults and 4 children) • Sacramento County Family referral 8/27 (2 adults and 3 children) • Professional staff at Marshfield Clinic.

  33. CONTACT INVESTIGATION, CONT. • Released from isolation 07/25/2013 – 08/14/2013 • New exposure 07/25/13 referral made to Green Bay (1 adult and 1 child) • New exposure 07/25/13 & 08/02/2013 2 staff members • Hospital visit grandson appendectomy 07/25/13 • Health Department Employee’s now asking how do we prevent further exposures to staff in the future?

  34. HELPING RESILIENCE IDENTIFY WITH HER NAME • Factors that contribute to Resilience: • Close relationships with family and friends • A positive view of yourself and confidence in your strengths and abilities • The ability to manage strong feelings and impulses • Good problem-solving and communication skills • Feeling in control • Seeking help and resources

  35. HELPING RESILIENCE IDENTIFY WITH HER NAME • Factors that contribute to resilience: • Seeing yourself as resilient, rather than as a victim. • Coping with stress in healthy ways and avoiding harmful coping strategies, such as substance abuse. • Helping others. • Finding positive meaning in your life despite difficult or traumatic events. • Source: http://www.pbs.org/thisemotionallife/topic/resilience/what-resilience

  36. A WORD ABOUT TREATING DRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS • “Hard data are often lacking to assist clinicians in the management of drug-resistant TB. Many of the drugs used to treat drug-resistant TB are not Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed for these indications. Examples include amikacin, all of the fluoroquinolones, and rifabutin. • Much-needed research is currently underway to more thoroughly document the clinical efficacies of various treatment regimens for drug-resistant TB and multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB. Managing drug-resistant TB is extremely challenging, and national guidelines call for treatment of drug-resistant TB to be provided by or in close consultation with experts.” Source: Curry International Tuberculosis Center Tuberculosis Drug Information Guide 2nd edition

  37. QUESTIONS/COMMENTS Mary Hackel, R.N., B.S.N. Public Health Nurse Marathon County Health Dept. Phone: 715-261-1945 Email:mary.hackel@co.marathon.wi.us

  38. Nathan Woolever B.A. Senior Microbiologist Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene Phone: 608-262-1618 Email: nathan.woolever@slh.wisc.edu

More Related