1 / 15

P1 2.0L & 2.4L EOL Test Results.

P1 2.0L & 2.4L EOL Test Results. 24 Oct 2003. Aim Of Test. To start gathering data for definition of targets in order to produce an EOL ESP for the HMC BSM. 10off 2.0L & 9off 2.4L modules were used for this test. Each module was run 3 times with different springs:

ralph
Download Presentation

P1 2.0L & 2.4L EOL Test Results.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P1 2.0L & 2.4L EOL Test Results. 24 Oct 2003.

  2. Aim Of Test • To start gathering data for definition of targets in order to produce an EOL ESP for the HMC BSM. • 10off 2.0L & 9off 2.4L modules were used for this test. • Each module was run 3 times with different springs: • Low limit spring – “Blue” spring. • Nominal spring – “Green” spring. • High limit spring – “Red” spring. • 57 runs in total. • Oil temperature 27°C (Slide 14). • Since this test, flow units have been changed from gpm (US) to lpm. Units on plots show gpm (US).

  3. Upper and lower Limits currently in the EOL machine From measured Test data

  4. + 3 StDev + 2 StDev Ave - 2 StDev - 3 StDev Module number (1- 19 modules tested)

  5. 2.0L results higher than 2.4L, due to modules being ”dry” – parts had stood for 6 weeks since build & assembly oil had drained out.

  6. Current Upper Limit in Test Machine Current Lower Limit in Test Machine

More Related