1 / 49

Evidence Informed Practice Donna Ciliska, RN, PhD May 2011

Evidence Informed Practice Donna Ciliska, RN, PhD May 2011. Objective. To understand the process of evidence-informed practice. Any current questions about what you are doing in practice?. Evidence-Based Practice a brief history….

rafael-mann
Download Presentation

Evidence Informed Practice Donna Ciliska, RN, PhD May 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence Informed PracticeDonna Ciliska, RN, PhDMay 2011

  2. Objective To understand the process of evidence-informed practice.

  3. Any current questions about what you are doing in practice?

  4. Evidence-BasedPractice a brief history…. 1991 -a group at McMaster University coined the phrase "evidence-based medicine" to describe medical diagnoses and treatment based on the best research and clinical evidence available. (Sackett, Haynes, Guyatt)

  5. Evidence-BasedPractice “…the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values to facilitate decision making” Sackett et al, 2000

  6. Evidence-BasedPractice a brief history…. 2007: BMJ • one of the 15 greatest medical breakthroughs since the journal's launch in 1840 • along with the development of anaesthesia, antibiotics, medical imaging, vaccines and the Pill

  7. Evidence-Informed Practice • Backlash to EBP • Jonathan Lomas, John Lavis and CHSRF

  8. Evidence-Based Decision Making Clinical state, setting, and circumstances Patient preferences and actions Clinical Expertise Clinical Expertise Health care resources  Research evidence

  9. Evidence of Gap in Acute and Primary Care 30-40% patients do not get treatments of proven effectiveness 20-25% patients get care that is not needed or potentially harmful Schuster, McGlynn, Brook (1998). Milbank Memorial Quarterly Grol R (2001). Med Care

  10. Evidence Transfer Gap Evidence from research Health-care decisions

  11. Why?

  12. Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  13. Step ‘0’Reflecting • Examine practice critically. • Acknowledge uncertainty in your practice. (Johnston & Fineout-Overholt, 2005; Witmer & Cullum, 1999)

  14. Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  15. Questions P opulation I ntervention C omparison O utcome

  16. Scenario AN EXAMPLE! H1N1 What interventions help to prevent or reduce the transmision of respiratory viruses?

  17. Define the question P hospital staff I handwashing, sanitizers, masks C usual routine O respiratory illness

  18. Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice Efficiently search for research evidence

  19. Evidence Pyramid Types of Resources Computerized decision support systems Evidence-based textbooks Clinical practice guidelines DARE, healthevidence.ca Systematic reviews Evidence-based journal abstracts Original published articles in journals Systems Summaries Synopses of Syntheses Syntheses Synopses of Studies Studies Adapted from DiCenso, Bayley and Haynes (2009). Accessing pre-appraised evidence: Fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(6):JC3-2, JC3-3 OR Evidence-Based Nursing, 12,99-101

  20. Start here with a clinical question (prevent*) AND (respiratory) AND (virus OR viral) Searching 0 142 2 10 25 SR, 3097 Google Scholar 322,000 Google 17,300,000 (DiCenso et al., 2009; Haynes et al. 2005; Robeson et al., 2010)

  21. Nursing +

  22. Public Health +Nursing+Obesity+ • http://plus.mcmaster.ca/np/Default.aspx • Sign up to be a rater: MOREebn@mcmaster.ca

  23. Critically and efficiently appraise the research sources Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  24. www.nccmt.ca

  25. Interpret/ form recommendations for practice or policy based on the literature found Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  26. How do you decide which evidence you consider?

  27. Which studies do you believe? • Best quality • Most recent (especially if it is review) • Most applicable to your population/patients • Intervention for which you have resources

  28. Adapt the information to a local context Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  29. Applicability and Transferability tool • Is it applicable to your patient population? • Do the staff have the skills to do this intervention? • Do we have enough staff to do this intervention? • Do you have the resources for training? • www.nccmt.ca

  30. Evidence-Informed Decision Making Clinical state, setting, and circumstances Patient preferences and actions Clinical Expertise Clinical Expertise Health care resources  Research evidence

  31. Decide whether to implement the adapted evidence into practice or policy Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  32. Policy change • Education • Academic detailing/outreach visits • Audit and feedback • Opinion leaders • Knowledge broker • Champions • Reminders: prompts; patient reminds staff • Interactive educational meetings/workshops • Multiple interventions Identify Strategies to Disseminate Information

  33. Guideline Dissemination & UptakeGrimshaw et al., 2006 • 309 comparisons from 235 studies • 86% found improvements in care, median absolute improvement in performance: • 14% when reminders used • 8% when educational materials disseminated • 7% when audit and feedback used • 6% multifaceted interventions

  34. Implementation What is the message? To whom (audience)? By whom (messenger)? How (transfer method)? With what expected impact (evaluation)? (Institute of Work & Health with J. Lavis, 2006. www.iwh.on.ca)

  35. Implementation Toolkit • Available for free: http://www.rnao.org/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=823 • DiCenso A et al. A toolkit to facilitate the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in healthcare settings. Hospital Quarterly 2002;5(3):55-60. • Dobbins M et al. Changing Nursing Practice: Evaluating the Usefulness of a Best-Practice Guideline Implementation Toolkit. Nursing Leadership 2005;18(1):34-45.

  36. Evaluate the effectiveness of implementation efforts Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  37. Evaluation • How will you know if people are using the evidence? • Have they changed their practice? • Does it make any difference to patients? • Decide on indicators (structure, process, outcome) • Gather baseline data

  38. Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Practice

  39. What can individual staff do? • Develop your skills: • asking questions • develop efficient search skills • develop critical appraisal skills, or find and use pre-appraised literature • On-line learning modules www.nccmt.ca

  40. What Can Organizations Do? ACCESS TIME • time away from unit in library, reading • time to go to research/journal club meetings • time on computer to conduct searches SKILLS • assist in search, critical appraisal skills, implementation, evaluation

  41. What Can Organizations Do? Get skills into: job adds, job descriptions performance appraisals

  42. Predicting Sustained Use of Evidence in Practice • Ongoing & supportive leadership at front lines & at executive levels critical (staff champions, managers, senior executives) • Organizational culture that supports use of evidence • Continuing education • Integration of guideline recommendations into organizational policies & procedures Davies et al. Determinants of the Sustained Use of Research Evidence in Nursing, 2006(www.chsrf.ca)

  43. Objective To understand the process of evidence-informed practice.

More Related