1 / 38

Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center

Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center. Steve Summer Project Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440. International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group London, UK June 13 – 14, 2002. Agenda.

raechel
Download Presentation

Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center Steve Summer Project Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch, AAR-440 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group London, UK June 13 – 14, 2002 IASFPWG – London, UK

  2. Agenda • Fuel vaporization computer model – validation experiments • Theoretical flammability limits as a function of MIE, FP, and O2 content • Fuel vapor simulant for use in future ignition testing • Reports to be published IASFPWG – London, UK

  3. Fuel Vaporization Model – Validation Experiments IASFPWG – London, UK

  4. Acknowledgements • Professor C. E. Polymeropolous of Rutgers University • David Adkins of the Boeing Company IASFPWG – London, UK

  5. Introduction • The original model proved a good method of predicting the evolution of hydrocarbons. • Results were presented by Prof. Polymeropolous (10/01 Fire Safety Conference) • Could prove to be a key tool in performing fleet flammability studies. • Fortran code has been converted to a user-friendly Excel spreadsheet by David Adkins of Boeing. IASFPWG – London, UK

  6. Walls and Ceiling, Ts Liquid, Tl Physical Considerations • 3D natural convection heat and mass transfer within tank • Fuel vaporization from the tank floor which is completely covered with liquid • Vapor condensation/vaporization from the tank walls and ceiling • Multi-component vaporization and condensation • Initial conditions are for an equilibrium mixture at a given initial temperature Gas, Tg IASFPWG – London, UK

  7. Major Assumptions • Well mixed gas and liquid phases within the tank • Uniform temperature and species concentrations in the gas and within the evaporating and condensing liquid • Rag≈109, Ral≈ 105-106 • Externally supplied uniform liquid and wall temperatures. Gas temperature is then computed from an energy balance • Condensate layer is thin and its temperature equals the wall temperature. IASFPWG – London, UK

  8. Major Assumptions (cont’d) • Mass transport at the liquid–gas interfaces was estimated using heat transfer correlations and the analogy between heat and mass transfer for estimating film mass transfer coefficients • Low evaporating species concentrations • Liquid Jet A composition was based on previous published data and and adjusted to reflect equilibrium vapor data (Polymeropoulos, 2000) IASFPWG – London, UK

  9. Assumed Jet A Composition • Based on data by Clewell, 1983, and adjusted to reflect for the presence of lower than C8 components IASFPWG – London, UK

  10. Assumed Jet A Composition 25 20 MW: 164 15 % by Volume 10 5 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Number of Carbon Atoms IASFPWG – London, UK

  11. User Inputs • Equilibrium Temperature • Final Wall and Liquid Temperatures • Time Constants • Mass Loading • Tank Dimensions Note: For comparison with experimental results, recorded wall and liquid temperature profiles were entered directly in lieu of the final temperatures and corresponding time constants IASFPWG – London, UK

  12. Program Outputs • Equilibrium gas & liquid concentrations/species fractionation • Species fractionation as a function of time • Ullage, wall and liquid temperatures as a function of time • Ullage gas concentrations as a function of time • FAR, ppm, ppmC3H8 IASFPWG – London, UK

  13. Experimental Setup • 17 ft3 vented tank placed inside environmental chamber. • Thermocouples used to monitor ambient, ullage, surface and fuel temperatures. • Blanket heater attached to bottom of tank used to heat fuel. • Hydrocarbon analyzer used to monitor ullage fuel vapors. IASFPWG – London, UK

  14. IASFPWG – London, UK

  15. IASFPWG – London, UK

  16. Future Testing • Future tests to consist of: • Constant surface temperature tests. • Various steady state pressure (cruise) tests. • Varying pressure tests (flight profile). • Varying wall to wall temperature tests. • Varying fuel distribution tests. IASFPWG – London, UK

  17. Future Model Improvements • Capability of varying tank pressure. • Capability of varying wall to wall temperature calculations. • Capability of varying fuel distribution. IASFPWG – London, UK

  18. Theoretical Flammability Limits as a Function of MIE, FP & O2 Content IASFPWG – London, UK

  19. Background • Present thinking in fuel tank inerting is that above x% O2, the tank is at risk throughout the entire flammability envelope, below x% O2 it is inert. IASFPWG – London, UK

  20. Background • Previous work has shown how flammability limits vary as a function of ignition energy. IASFPWG – London, UK

  21. Background • It follows intuitively that flammability limits will shift in a similar manner as inert gas is added to the fuel tank. • Thus, if your fuel tank is only partially inerted, the flammability exposure time has still been reduced by a significant amount. • How can this be quantified, validated and built into the flammability model? IASFPWG – London, UK

  22. Computed Flammability Limits as a Function of O2 • Similar methodology as that in DOT/FAA/AR-98/26to compute flammability limits as a function of MIE. IASFPWG – London, UK

  23. Computed Flammability Limits as a Function of O2 • Correlation of the variation of LOC with altitude. • Previously determined with a large (~20 J) spark source. IASFPWG – London, UK

  24. Computed Flammability Limits as a Function of O2 • , where • Tmin is the minimum of the parabola given by Tmin = Tfp + 22 – 1.5Z. • a is a constant, determined by matching the curve as best as possible to the calculated 21% O2 curve for the given ignition energy. IASFPWG – London, UK

  25. Resultant Curves for a 20 J Calculation IASFPWG – London, UK

  26. Flammability Limits as a Function of MIE, O2 and FP • Combining this with the parabolic MIE calculations and LOC curves for various ignition energies, results in flammability limits which vary as a function of ignition energy, O2 concentration and flashpoint. • The sum of this work was put together into a working MS Excel model by Ivor Thomas, using the following LOC curves. IASFPWG – London, UK

  27. IASFPWG – London, UK

  28. Conclusions • By a set of simple calculations, one can obtain varying flammability limits as a function of ignition energy, O2 concentration and flashpoint. • Once validated, this data can be used in the flammability model to show reduction in fleetwide fuel tank flammability as a function of the amount of inert gas added to the tank. • Future tests to validate these calculations are planned at the technical center. IASFPWG – London, UK

  29. Fuel Vapor Simulant for use in Future Ignition Testing IASFPWG – London, UK

  30. Background • Our current method for ignition testing of Jet-A fuel vapors is extremely time consuming (up to as long as 2 hours per test). • If a gaseous mixture was available to simulate the flammability properties of Jet A, it would allow us to perform more tests quicker. IASFPWG – London, UK

  31. Background • Availability of said mixture would also have applicability to other issues (e.g. explosion proof testing of pumps, etc.) • Subcommittee of SAE AE-5 currently being formed to look at this issue. IASFPWG – London, UK

  32. Past Simulants - Hexane IASFPWG – London, UK

  33. Past Simulants – Caltech Mixture • NTSB Docket No. SA-516, Exhibit No. 20O • Volumetric Ratio of H2:C3H8 of 5:1 • Examined the effect of fuel concentration, vessel size and ignition source on pressure history. IASFPWG – London, UK

  34. Past Simulants – Caltech Mixture IASFPWG – London, UK

  35. Proposed Research Activity at Tech Center • 20 L combustion vessel to be constructed within 4 – 6 weeks. • Variable energy (0.5 mJ – 5 J) spark source to be obtained within 8 – 10 weeks. • Tests to be conducted in a manner similar to the procedures layed out in ASTM flammability standards (e.g. E582, E2079, etc). IASFPWG – London, UK

  36. Proposed Research Activity at Tech Center IASFPWG – London, UK

  37. Reports to be Published IASFPWG – London, UK

  38. Reports • Summer, S. M., Fuel Flammability Characteristics of JP-8 Fuel Vapors Existing Within a Typical Aircraft Fuel Tank, DOT/FAA/AR-01/54 • Summer, S. M., JP-8 Ignition Testing at Reduced Oxygen Concentrations, DOT/FAA/AR-xx/xx IASFPWG – London, UK

More Related