Treatment of waste brine from a brackish reverse osmosis plant
Download
1 / 24

Treatment of Waste Brine from a Brackish Reverse Osmosis Plant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 478 Views
  • Uploaded on

Treatment of Waste Brine from a Brackish Reverse Osmosis Plant. El Paso Water Utilities and Fort Bliss Eastside Brackish Groundwater Desalination Facility Joel C. Rife, P.E., DEE September 16, 2002. HEAD WATERS OF COLORADO RIVER. REAL BIG PIPE. REAL BIG PUMPS.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Treatment of Waste Brine from a Brackish Reverse Osmosis Plant' - rad


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Treatment of waste brine from a brackish reverse osmosis plant l.jpg

Treatment of Waste Brine from a Brackish Reverse Osmosis Plant

El Paso Water Utilities and Fort Bliss

Eastside Brackish Groundwater Desalination Facility

Joel C. Rife, P.E., DEE

September 16, 2002


Slide4 l.jpg

HEAD WATERS OF COLORADO RIVER Plant

REAL BIG PIPE

REAL BIG PUMPS

CONFLUENCE OF OHIO AND MISSISSIPPI RIVERS


Brackish water treatment becoming feasible l.jpg
Brackish Water Treatment Becoming Feasible Plant

  • Membrane Technologies More Affordable

  • Problem is What to do with the Waste Reject Water

    • Direct Discharge Not An Option

    • Activated Sludge Microbes Have No Interest In TDS

    • Historically Hasn’t Been a Problem with Desalination Plants (Dump in Ocean)


Brackish ro facility design criteria l.jpg
Brackish RO Facility Design Criteria Plant

Permeate Flow (Drinking Water to Storage) 18 MGD

Evaporation/Concentration Options

  • RO Plant Recovery 90 Percent

  • TDS in Reject 11,000 mg/L

  • Reject Flow 1.8 MGD

    Deep Well Disposal Option

  • Recovery 85 percent (permitting constraints – max. allowable TDS)

  • TDS in reject 8,000 mg/L

  • Reject flow 3.2 MGD


Evaporation options l.jpg
Evaporation Options Plant

  • Full-Scale Evaporation Ponds

  • Turbo-Mist Evaporator and Pond System

  • TNRCC Pond Liner Requirements

    - Clay w/permeability <1 x 107 cm/sec

    - Plastic liner with leak detection


Full scale evaporation ponds l.jpg
Full-Scale Evaporation Ponds Plant

  • Designed for 5 Consecutive “Critical” Years Storage per TNRCC Requirements

  • 5-Foot Depth

  • 431 Acres

  • Compared Single Pond vs. 4-cell vs. 15-cell

  • Recommendation – 4-cell

  • 60-mil HDPE Liner


Turbo mist evaporator and pond l.jpg
Turbo-Mist Evaporator and Pond Plant

  • Proprietary Machine by Slimline Mfg. LTD

  • Nozzles in Ring at End of 100 MPH Wind

  • Pilot Test Found 15-20% Water Evaporated Through Turbo-Mist Units

  • Wind Must Remain Below 10 MPH to Prevent Excessive Drift

  • 3000 Connected HP


Cost comparison evaporation options l.jpg
Cost Comparison PlantEvaporation Options

Full-Scale Evaporation Pond

  • Capital Cost $25.42 Million

  • 20-yr Present Worth $44.36 Million

    Turbo-Mist and Pond

  • Capital Cost $13.8 Million

  • 20-yr Present Worth $56.74 Million


Deep well disposal l.jpg
Deep Well Disposal Plant

Evaluation Criteria

  • Depth

  • Confining Zone

  • Simplicity of Geological Structure

  • Risk of Inducing Seismicity

  • Injection Zone TDS

  • One-Hour Pressure Buildup

  • Distance Traveled After 30 Years


Deep well disposal13 l.jpg
Deep Well Disposal Plant

  • Capital Cost $9.69 Million

  • 20-yr Present Worth $27.69 Million

  • Cost Significantly Less Than Evaporation

    Regulatory Requirements Are a Concern:

  • Well Classification Delay Until Hydrogeology and Water Chemistry are Characterized

  • Permit (Extensive Public Participation)

  • Authorization by Rule (Less of a Delay)


Solar gradient ponds evolved from conceptual zero discharge ro plant l.jpg
Solar Gradient Ponds PlantEvolved From Conceptual Zero-Discharge RO Plant

Product

Water

Concentrator

RO

Evaporator


Solar gradient ponds l.jpg
Solar Gradient Ponds Plant

  • Effective for Seawater RO Brine Disposal – 60 Installations World-Wide

  • Thermal Energy Can Be Used For Heating or To Produce Electricity

  • Capital Cost $35.2 Million

    Cost Comparison per 1000 Gallons Delivered

    RO With Full-Scale Evaporation $1.95

    RO With Deep Well Disposal $1.46

    RO With Solar Gradient Ponds $2.04


Membrane concentrator system l.jpg
Membrane Concentrator System Plant

  • Goal: Decrease Reject Volume While Deep Well Permitting Process is Completed

  • Challenge: “Treat the Untreatable”

  • Solution: Pretreatment Prior to Further Concentration by Reverse Osmosis

    Pretreatment Options Investigated:

  • Lime Softening

  • High-Rate Nanofiltration


Lime softening pretreatment l.jpg
Lime Softening Pretreatment Plant

  • Objective is to Reduce Silica and Carbonate Hardness Back to Original Brackish Reject Water Concentrations

  • Use of Magnesium Salts for Silica Removal Common Practice for Boiler Feed Water

  • Lack of Data for Treatment of High Silica Concentrations

  • Jar Testing Required to Prove Out Silica Removal and Determine Dosage Requirements


Results of lime treatment jar testing l.jpg
Results of Lime Treatment Jar Testing Plant

  • Silica and Hardness Removal Goals Achieved with Lime Only

  • Recirculated Lime Floc Critical

  • Further Reductions of Silica with Magnesium Salt Addition

  • Polymer Required to Achieve Acceptable Silt Density Index (<3)

  • Barium Still a Problem – Final RO Recovery of 60% Due to High Barium



High rate nf softening option l.jpg
High-Rate NF Softening Option Plant

  • Suggested by Osmonics Based on Successful Oil Field Experiments

  • Concept is to Remove Cations (Ca, Mg, Fe, Ba) That Act as Nucleating Sites for Silica, While Passing Silica

  • “Slick” Single Pass Membrane is Key to Prevent Silica Buildup On Membrane

  • Successful Bench Scale Experiment Conducted on Simulated Reject





ad