1 / 29

PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security

PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security. Lecture 4a – Organizing for Emergency Management. Introduction. Simply put, a disaster is a sudden and dramatic emergency. When disaster strikes, the demands facing threatened communities are obvious and compelling. Introduction.

raanan
Download Presentation

PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 4a – Organizing for Emergency Management

  2. Introduction • Simply put, a disaster is a sudden and dramatic emergency. • When disaster strikes, the demands facing threatened communities are obvious and compelling.

  3. Introduction • An affected community must respond immediately and vigorously. • Fortunately, such immediate response is precisely what occurs most of the time. • Local individuals, groups, and organizations respond quickly, not always predictably or efficiently, but in such a way that important demands are met in a timely manner.

  4. Introduction • But responding to an event is very different from responding to the possibility of an event. • To most people, natural, technological, and civil hazards are not major concerns – until they occur. • The probability of occurrence for any particular citizen is very low as is public knowledge of disasters. • This is why public education is required.

  5. Introduction • It is local communities that must deal directly with the immediate problems of disaster, and yet it is at the local level that a readiness posture is most difficult to sustain. • From a national perspective, disasters occur more often and create higher total damages and costs.

  6. Introduction • Thus, the push for emergency planning comes from the top down. • Grassroots support for disaster mitigation and preparedness is hard to maintain. • The challenge for the emergency manager is somehow to overcome indifference about, and sometimes outright opposition to, disaster planning and preparedness.

  7. Foundations of Emergency Management • Emergency preparedness – even if it is modest – can make an important difference if a disaster takes place.

  8. Foundations of Emergency Management • Those with responsibility for emergency management never have to start from scratch. • Although disasters are nonroutine events, communities and regions are remarkably adaptive in meeting disaster-related demands, regardless of their level of preparedness.

  9. Foundations of Emergency Management • Communities are adaptable because: • Most (including federally declared) disasters are far from massive in comparison with the remaining human and material resources. Most communities and individuals are remarkable resilient. • Most of the problems posed by disaster are at least partially organizational and informational in character. • Offering solutions to them is a major objective of emergency management.

  10. Foundations of Emergency Management • When there has been very little planning for an emergency, the ability to improvise assumes singular importance. • However, even a modest level of preparedness clearly makes a difference and enhances any improvisation. • Two sidebars (pp. 31, 32 of ICMA).

  11. Foundations of Emergency Management • Both operations show a functioning organization. • Both are able to respond to the basic demands of the particular disaster situation. • Both have legitimate domains of responsibility.

  12. Foundations of Emergency Management • Both have mobilized human and material resources and have clear action plans. • Each on its own terms is successful. • The key difference is that the first was improvised and the second was based on a preparedness plan.

  13. Foundations of Emergency Management • Overall, however, the second is superior because: • Less confusion over responsibility. • Mobilization of resources is faster and easier. • Improvisation will be more successful because of initial clarity in roles and responsibilities.

  14. Principles of Emergency Preparedness • The goal of emergency preparedness is the rapid restoration of normal routines. • Preparedness and improvisation are foundations of emergency management. • Preparedness is clarity about what may be needed, what should be done, and how it will be done. • Improvisation implies that flexibility will be critical.

  15. Principles of Emergency Preparedness • Preparedness is a continuous process. • Preparedness reduces unknowns during an emergency. • Preparedness is an educational activity. • Preparedness is based on knowledge (myths and realities). • Preparedness evokes appropriate action.

  16. Principles of Emergency Preparedness • Resistance to emergency preparedness is a given. • Modest planning is a reasonable goal.

  17. Emergency Management Checklist • It is wise to plan for disasters generally (comprehensive emergency management).

  18. Emergency Management Checklist • Preparedness is a process: • Convening meetings to share information. • Conducting drills or exercises to go over specifics. • Updating plans and strategies as conditions change. • Formulating understandings and mutual aid agreements. • Maintaining standby human and material resources. • Engaging in public education. • Engaging in disaster training. • Maintaining a current, practical understanding of present and future hazards. • Coordinating and integrating organizational disaster plans.

  19. Emergency Management Functions • Mobilizing emergency personnel and resources. • Mobilization should occur on detection or notification of a threat. • Warning the public and taking protective action. • Timely messages that are authoritative, accurate, and precise. • Protective action will vary on type and magnitude of threat, but will be most complicated in technological disasters.

  20. Emergency Management Functions • Caring for the victims. • Search and rescue, care for the injured and dead, temporary services to the displaced population, ensuring access to relief programs. • Principal problems are organizational: how to coordinate so many responses. • Assessing the damage. • Should be a continuous process.

  21. Emergency Management Functions • Restoring essential public services. • Utilities, communications, transportation, public safety, legal and govt. Programs. • Informing the public. • Plans should contain definitive procedures for communicating with the public to avoid overlapping and confusing communications.

  22. Emergency Management Functions • Record keeping. • Information retrieval can be a problem, but needed for assistance eligibility and post-disaster evaluation. • Planning the recovery. • Requirements for aid, community development, repetition of vulnerability.

  23. Emergency Management Functions • Coordinating emergency management activities. • Effective emergency management should not be based on command and control but on emergent resource coordination. • Goal of coordination should be: • Efficient mobilization of personnel and resources. • Timely communication within and between organizations. • Timely communication with the public. • Resolution of conflicts over goals, tactics, and resources. • Effective interaction with regional and national government. • Effective exercise of authority when needed.

  24. Types of Emergency Management Organizations. • Cities (main emergency management coordinator). • City manager (23%). • Part-time coordinator (19%). • Full-time coordinator (14%). • Fire chief (16%). • Counties (main coordinator). • Full-time coordinator (44%). • Part-time coordinator (33%).

  25. Types of Emergency Management Organizations. • Larger the jurisdiction, the more likely it is to have a dedicated unit. • Organization can be independent (free-standing) or embedded (part of another unit). • Independent. • Advantages – central location between elected officials and responders. • Disadvantage – Lack of legitimacy and credibility.

  26. Types of Emergency Management Organizations. • Embedded. • Advantages – organizational culture and existing networks. • Disadvantages – competing goals and objectives.

  27. Program Implementation and Review

More Related