1 / 71

Bioterrorism Agent Case Studies: Manuel's Mystery and Loretta's Lymph

This website provides case studies on the identification and management of bioterrorism agents. The case studies include information on patient history, symptoms, laboratory test results, and safety concerns for laboratory personnel.

quinto
Download Presentation

Bioterrorism Agent Case Studies: Manuel's Mystery and Loretta's Lymph

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bioterrorism Agent Case Studies Beth Schweitzer MT(ASCP), SM Microbiology Specialist Website: www.nphl.org NPHL Nebraska Public Health Lab

  2. Case Format • Lack of pertinent patient information • Travel history • Occupation • Symptoms • Duration of Illness

  3. Case Format • Cultures are set according to NPHL Operating Procedures • BAP • Chocolate • MacConkey • Thioglycolate Broth

  4. Zoonotic Diseases • Naturally occurring • Cases in NE • Safety concerns for laboratorian

  5. Manuel’s Mystery • Blood Cultures drawn on 16 y/o Hispanic male • Instrument flags bottles positive at day 4 • Gram stain: NOS • Bottles blind subbed and placed back on machine • Bottles discarded on day 5 (standard operating procedure)

  6. Con’t • BAP and Choc show a haze of growth at 48 hours ( 6th day of original Blood culture) • Gram stain: tiny gram- negative coccobacilli • What organisms should you be thinking!!!

  7. Haemophilus • Pasturella • Oligella • Bordetella • Brucella • Francisella • Acinetobacter • Psychrobacter

  8. Think Biosafety • In a biosafety cabinet you perform following: • Identification for Haemophilus • Rapid NH • Quad/Tri Plate • Staph streak

  9. Think Biosafety • Reactions do not fit the pattern for Haemophilus!! • What now?

  10. Think Biosafety • Do not perform automated commercial identification on slow growing-GNCB that do not grow on MAC/EMB. • The risk of aerosols is too high!

  11. Think Biosafety • In a biosafety cabinet you perform following: • Urease slant (Pos in 2 hours) • Tube motility (Neg at 48 hours)

  12. TEST Oxidase Motility Urease Nitrate BAP X/V Brucella + 95% - + + + - Bordetella+ + + + + - Acinetobacter- - V - + - Psychrobacter + - + V + - Oligella + V + + + - Haemophilus V - V + - +

  13. What organism can’t we rule out? Brucella spp.

  14. Brucella spp. - Biosafety Alert: • Brucellosis was the most commonly reported laboratory-associated bacterial infection. • Cases have occurred in clinical laboratory settings by “sniffing” cultures, direct skin contact with cultures, and aerosol generating procedures (e.g. culture manipulation)

  15. Brucellosis: • Infective dose:10 -100 organisms • Incubation period: 5 days - > 6 months • Duration of illness: weeks to months • Fever, profuse sweating, malaise, headache and muscle/back pain. • NO Person to person transmission • Mortality: <5% • Persistence of organism: very stable

  16. Brucella spp.-Specimen Selection: • Serum • The diagnosis of brucellosis is frequently achieved by serology. An acute & convalescent phase specimen should be collected (21 days apart) • Blood or bone marrow • Most often isolated from these • Tissue (spleen, liver) • Occasionally isolated

  17. Brucella spp. – Technical hints • Oxidase positive, rapid urease positive, non-motile, slow growing gram negative-coccobacillus REFER

  18. Naturally occurring • Patient was a visitor from Mexico and had ingested unpasteurized goat cheese

  19. Loretta’s Lymph • Lymph node aspirate from a 35 y/o female • Gram stain: Moderate WBC’s Few Gram- negative rods

  20. Growth at 24 hours • Tiny (1-2 mm) grey colonies on BAP and Choc • Non-lactose fermenter on Mac

  21. Biochemical tests • Oxidase (-) • Indole (-) • Use commercial ID system

  22. What organism could it be? • Fits Enterobacteriaceae pattern • Without patient history hard to create a differential

  23. Y. pestis – commercial ID systems • Included in the data base of MicroScan, Vitek, and API 20E.. etc True accuracy not yet determined 60% of California’s Y. pestis ID’s are from commercial systems

  24. Y. pestis – commercial ID systems • If ID as Y. pestis – send to NPHL • May ID as Shigella ssp, H2S- negative Salmonella, Acinetobacter, or Y. pseudotuberculosis • Biochemically inert nature of organism

  25. Y. pestis –commercial ID systems • How do we know when to question ID results?? • Source • Colony morphology • H2S neg Salmonella • Shigella characteristics • Inpatient/outpatient status-nosocomial infection.

  26. Plague Epidemiology: • During 1988-2002, 112 human cases were reported from 11 western states • 30% of cases are in Native Americans in the Southwest. • 15% case fatality rate • 80% of cases occur in summer and near the patient’s residence- FLEAS

  27. Y. pestis -Specimen Selection: • Specimen selection is important • Bubonic • Bubo - lymph node aspirate • Septicemic - blood - organisms may be intermittent. Take three specimens 10-30 minutes apart • Pneumonic • Sputum/throat • Bronchial washings

  28. Y. pestis - Gram stain from sputum • Small, gram-negative rods

  29. Y. pestis - Direct Culture Growthon Agar Plate:

  30. Y. pestis - Growth in Broth: • Thioglycolate Broth (may see from original specimen set-up) • Do not shake tubes • Observe suspended flocculent clumps on side and bottom of tube. Broth remains clear • May also happen with Y. pseudotuberculosis or S. pneumoniae

  31. Y. pestis – Growth in Broth culture: Y.pestis Y. pseudotuberculosis

  32. Y. pestis - Technical Hints: • Small gram-negative, poorly staining rods from blood, lymph node aspirate, or respiratory specimens, BLOODY SPUTUM Refer

  33. Naturally Occurring • Couple from New York City infected by flea bites on trip to New Mexico • Returned home to NYC before becoming ill

  34. Bob’s Booboo • Aerobic culture is collected from wound on the hand of a 45 y/o male • Gram stain: NOS Mod WBC

  35. Con’t • At 48 hours there is slight haze growth on the BAP and Choc • Gram stain: faintly staining gram- negative coccobacilli • What organisms should you be thinking!!!

  36. Haemophilus • Pasturella • Oligella • Bordetella • Brucella • Francisella • Acinetobacter • Psychrobacter • Actinobacillus

  37. Think Biosafety • Do not perform automated commercial identification on slow growing-GNCB that do not grow on MAC/EMB. • The risk of aerosols is too high!

  38. Think Biosafety • In a biosafety cabinet growth you perform the following: • Oxidase (Negative) • Manual commercial identification system • No identification • Reisolate to BAP and Choc

  39. No growth on BAP after reisolation • What to do now???!?!?!

  40. Haemophilus is a likely organism • Haemophilus quad plate is set for identification • No growth is seen • Its NOT Haemophilus… What Now?

  41. In a biosafety cabinet the following tests are performed: • Motility (Negative at 24 hours) • Urease (Negative at 24 hours) • B-lactamase (+)

  42. What organism can’t we rule out? Francisella

  43. F. tularensis – Gram stain: Poorly staining, tiny Gram-negative coccobacilli

  44. Francisella/E. coli

  45. F. tularensis –growth characteristics: • Will grow initially on sheep blood agar, chocolate agar and Thayer-Martin agar, but poorly or not at all on sub • Grows slowly at 35oC, poorly at 28oC • 24 hours on BAP and Choc • gray-white, translucent colonies • usually too small to be seen individually

  46. F. tularensis –growth characteristics: • Thayer Martin is a good selective media from a mixed culture

More Related