Government office center mid atlantic u s
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 23

Government Office Center Mid-Atlantic U.S. PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 52 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Government Office Center Mid-Atlantic U.S. Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project Alexander Ward | Construction Management James Faust | CM Advisor. Government Office Center Mid-Atlantic U.S. Presentation Outline: Project Background Analysis #3: Integrated Processes Engaged Owner

Download Presentation

Government Office Center Mid-Atlantic U.S.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Government office center mid atlantic u s

Government Office CenterMid-Atlantic U.S.

Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project

Alexander Ward | Construction Management

James Faust | CM Advisor


Government office center mid atlantic u s1

Government Office CenterMid-Atlantic U.S.

  • Presentation Outline:

  • Project Background

  • Analysis #3: Integrated Processes

    • Engaged Owner

  • Analysis #2: SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

    • Renewable Energy/Electrical Breadth

  • Analysis #1: Implementation of Building Information Modeling

    • Facilities Management

  • Analysis #4: Progressive Collapse

    • Structural Breadth

  • Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project

Alexander Ward | Construction Management

James Faust | CM Advisor


Project background

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Project Background

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

  • $42 Million Renovation

  • 14 Story Federal Office & Courthouse

  • 316,000 SF

  • August 1, 2011 – January 31, 2014

  • Major upgrades to Envelope and HVAC systems

  • LEED Gold (LEED 2009 EBO&M)

  • Occupied throughout construction

Slide 3


Integrated processes

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Integrated Processes

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Problem Identification:

  • Industry trending toward integrated solutions

  • Engaged owners extremely important in process

  • Need to educate owners on importance of role

    Research Goal:

  • Evaluate key benefits of engaged owner

Relationship Building

Commu-

nication

Slide 4


Integrated processes1

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Integrated Processes

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

…improved delivery through schedule acceleration…

An Engaged Owner is:

  • Actively involved in the design and design review process

  • Aware of the unique challenges of the project

  • Willing to use uncommon project delivery and construction strategies when feasible

Schedule Accel.

Relationship Building

Commu-

nication

Slide 5


Integrated processes2

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Integrated Processes

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

…improved delivery through scheduleacceleration…

…faster and more refined decision making…

An Engaged Owner is:

  • More informed of design options being considered by the project team

  • More educated on the consequences of these design options

  • Actively involved in design reviews

  • Supportive and responsive during construction phase

Schedule Accel.

Relationship Building

Decision Making

Commu-

nication

Slide 6


Integrated processes3

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Integrated Processes

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

…improved delivery through scheduleacceleration…

…faster and more refined decision making…

…reduced frequency and degree of changes…

An Engaged Owner is:

  • Helpful in defining project needs early in the development process

  • Educated and understands how design teams meet the previously defined program requirements

  • Clear in explaining why a design change is needed and what it will accomplish

Schedule Accel.

Relationship Building

Decision Making

Commu-

nication

Changes

Slide 7


Sips study for curtain wall activities

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Problem Identification:

  • Highly repetitive curtain wall replacement activities

  • Opportunity to implement BIPV system

    Research Goal:

  • Evaluate the benefits of SIPS and BIPV

Slide 8


Sips study for curtain wall activities1

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Activities:

  • Installation of weather wall

  • Demolition of existing curtain wall

  • Installation of new structural steel

  • Installation of new curtain wall

  • Demolition of weather wall

  • Frame and rough-in

  • Restoration of finishes

North Area in Red – South Area in Blue

Slide 9


Sips study for curtain wall activities2

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Existing Schedule:

  • Oct. 11, 2011 – Sept. 16, 2013 (101 weeks)

  • 8 week schedule gap between North and South

  • Longest activity requires 100 days (North finishes)

Slide 10


Sips study for curtain wall activities3

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

$425K

GCs

$1.65M Total Value

25 Weeks Saved

Liquidated Damages

$1.225M

Slide 11


Bipv curtain wall

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

BIPV Curtain Wall

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Slide 12


Bipv curtain wall1

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

BIPV Curtain Wall

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Feasibility:

+$404,200 for PV marginal cost

–$382,500 for sunshades deduction

=$21,700 net marginal cost

~$13,000 per year in energy savings

Payback < 2 years

Need to consider heat gain, constructability, etc.

Slide 13


Implementation of bim

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Implementation of BIM

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Problem Identification:

  • Minimal push of information downstream for future needs

    Research Goal:

  • Evaluate the benefits of implementing BIM for facilities management uses

Slide 14


Implementation of bim1

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Implementation of BIM

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Slide 15


Implementation of bim2

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Implementation of BIM

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Slide 16


Progressive collapse

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Progressive Collapse

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Problem Identification:

  • Original construction decades prior to recent federal requirements

    Research Goal:

  • Compare the cost and schedule impacts of adding this scope of work in three scenarios

Slide 17


Progressive collapse1

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Progressive Collapse

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Freyrom Anchor Section

Slide 18


Summary of conclusions

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Acknowledgements

Summary of Conclusions

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Questions or Comments?

The Balfour Beatty Construction Team

Industry Professionals

Penn State AE Department

My Family and Friends

Slide 19


Appendix slides

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Appendix Slides

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions

Acknowledgements


Project background1

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Project Background

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

  • Owner | U.S. General Services Administration

  • CM | Balfour Beatty Construction

  • Architect | TranSystems Corporation

  • Structural Engineer | Thornton Tomasetti

  • MEP Engineer | Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.

  • Sustainability / Design Consultant | William McDonough + Partners


Sips study for curtain wall activities4

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements

Traditional SIPS:

Non-Traditional SIPS:


Implementation of bim3

Government Office Center | Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Implementation of BIM

Presentation Outline:

Project Background

Integrated Processes

SIPS Study for Curtain Wall Activities

Implementation of BIM

Progressive Collapse

Summary of Conclusions & Acknowledgements


  • Login