Housing interventions to tackling segregation
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 23

Housing interventions to tackling segregation PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 71 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Housing interventions to tackling segregation. in the framework of area based integrated approach Eszter Somogyi Almería Seminar RomaNET. Topics to be addressed. Types of deprived Roma neighbourhoods in cities and level of segregation Main problems Why segregation is a problem?

Download Presentation

Housing interventions to tackling segregation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

Housing interventions to tackling segregation

in the framework of

area based integrated approach

Eszter Somogyi

Almería Seminar

RomaNET


Topics to be addressed

Topics to be addressed

  • Types of deprived Roma neighbourhoods in cities and level of segregation

  • Main problems

  • Why segregation is a problem?

  • Interventions:

    • area based approach

    • integrated approach

    • housing interventions / inclusive housing policies

    • desegregation

Metropolitan Research Institute


Urban deprived roma neighbourhoods

Urban deprived Roma neighbourhoods

Types of neighboorhouds level of segregation types of interventions

Dimensions:

  • Location:

    • Integrated part of the city (no physical barriers)

    • Peripherial part of the city (industrial sites, physical barriers etc)

    • Isolated from the city

  • Size (number of housing units and people): small (below 150 persons), medium (few hundred persons), large (few thousands)

  • Level of social deprivation / segregation:

    • Socially mixed neighbourhoods

    • Socially homogenous

  • Level of phyisical deprivation:

    • Urban environment

    • Infrastructure supply

    • Housing conditions

  • Level of service provision (public, social, commercial etc.)

Metropolitan Research Institute


Spatial relationship between marginalized communities and the built rural urban area

Spatial relationship between marginalized communities and the built rural / urban area

a. isolated (the link at the physical proximity or the relationship link is very poor)

b. satellite type (the link at the psychological proximity is very poor)

c. tangent (peripheral separated by a physical obstacle, more or less penetrable)

d. peripheral with a contact zone

e. non-integrated incorporated type

f. enclave

g. disseminated

(cf. Berescu, Cătălin; Celac, Mariana,

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

a. isolated (the link at the physical proximity or the relationship link is very poor)

Moldava Nad Bodvou

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

b. satellite type (the link at the psychological proximity is very poor)

Ózd, Hétes telep (HU)

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

Kosice, Luník IX

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

c. tangent (peripheral separated by a physical obstacle, more or less penetrable)

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

d. peripheral with a contact zone

Sofia, Fakulteta

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

e. non-integrated incorporated type

Budapest, Dzsumbuj

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing interventions to tackling segregation

f. disseminated/ enclave

Bucharest, Ferentari

Metropolitan Research Institute


Main problems multidimensional

Main problems-multidimensional

  • Social: high unemployment, low level qualification, poverty, crime etc.

  • Physical: neglected and deterriorated urban environment, bad quality/substandard housing, lack of infrastructure, unhealthy environment

  • Legal issues: no title to land or to housing, no rental contract, no registered address

  • absence or low level of basic public services (education, health, social, employment, cultural etc)

  • Bad connection to the city: roads, transport

Metropolitan Research Institute


Why segregation matters

Why segregation matters?

Segregation has multiple dimensions:

  • Physical separation: distance from the main parts of the city, the quality of living environment

  • Social distance – concentration of social problems

  • Lack of or limited access to public and other services

  • Lack of informations about opportunities (employment)

  • Closed social relations – very limited relations with the „outside” world

    Limited choices in every spheres of life reproduction of poverty and exclusion

Metropolitan Research Institute


Area based integrated approach

Area-based integrated approach

  • To tackle spatially concentrated multiple problems of social exclusion in deprived neighbourhoods

  • In a defined area implement several actions that can generate real changes in the neighbourhood and in the relation of the neighbourhood and the city itself (integrate the neighbourhood to the structure and life of the city)

  • Integrated approach: physical and soft actions parallel implemented

  • Synergy effects

  • Longer term intervention

Metropolitan Research Institute


Visioning the future of the neighbourhood

Visioning the future of the neighbourhood

  • Establish a long term strategy

    • the neighbourhood/ area can be integrated into the city or not

    • Regeneration or eradication

  • With the participation of the community and key stakeholders

Metropolitan Research Institute


Mapping housing problems

Mapping housing problems

  • Tenant issues:

    • Owners

    • Tenants: public housing or private rentals

  • Legal issues:

    • Illegal settlements

    • Lack of legal title to housing (owners, tenants)

    • Lack of registered address entitlement to social benefits

  • Quality of housing:

    • Substandard units

    • public utilities: lack of infrastructure or terminated utility services, illegal connections

    • Overcrowdness

    • Unhealthy circumstances

  • Affordability problem: rent, housing maintenance costs, cost of legalisation

Metropolitan Research Institute


Aim of housing interventions

Aim of housing interventions

  • Improve housing conditions

  • Open up housing choices: needs and financial capacities

  • Cease segregation also through housing intervention

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing measures 1

Housing measures 1.

  • Social housing

    • New construction

    • Refurbishment of existing units

    • purchase of apartments for social housing

  • Private rental housing

    • Support access to private rentals (discrimination)

    • Support rent payment

    • Provide guarantee for landlords in case of „high-risk” groups

  • Owner occupation

    • Support access to owner occupied housing

    • Refurbishment of existing owner-occupied units

      Through

    • lump sum subsidy,

    • saving programs,

    • Subsidised loans (micro-credit)

Metropolitan Research Institute


Housing measures 2

Housing measures 2.

  • Housing allowance programs

    • Support rent payments

    • Support the payments of maintenance costs

  • Tackle illegal housing situations

    • Set up mechanism to legalise settlements and housing situations

      (for illegal settlements both for owners and tenants )

    • Legalise conncections to public utilities

    • Debt management programs

    • Register address

  • Improve infrastructure supply

    • Public utilities

    • (Road, pavements etc.)

Metropolitan Research Institute


Implementation 1

Implementation 1.

  • Match different kind of fundings

    • State housing programs

    • Regional programs

    • Local programs

    • EU funds

    • Resources of the beneficiaries

  • Mix different kind of measures at the same time

    • Needs of the households

    • Financial capacity

      Social composition of households can be very heterogenous

  • Ensure sustainability

    • income generation programs and

    • social support (benefits and social work)

Metropolitan Research Institute


Implementation 2

Implementation 2.

  • Assess the effect of housing measures on segregation!

  • Location matters

    • New construction should not reproduce segregation

    • Relocation people into integrated parts of the city – reduce the concentration of disadvantaged people in the neighbourhood

    • Inclusionary planning

      Primary target group – young adults: open up housing choices for them

  • Prior and follow up to housing interventions soft measures should be implemented

    • participatory planning and implementation

    • community development

    • empowerment: social work, training and employment programs

  • Sufficient level of intervention:

    • create visible and tangible changes in the neighbourhood

    • create transperent conditions for participating in the programs


Housing and segregation some main points

Housing and segregation: some main points

  • Housing interventions in themselves do not cease segregation and break social exclusion!

  • Without tackling social problems housing interventions are not sustainable:

    • New/refurbished housing become deterriorated

    • Households cannot maintain housing of higher quality

  • To tackle segregation:

    • Decrease the concentration of disadvantaged people – mobilisation of people (fully or partly)

    • Improve physical and non-physical connections to the city

    • Increase the quantity and improve the quality of services

Metropolitan Research Institute


Existing practices

Existing practices

Already existing practices only partially adoptable

Each program has positive and negative elements

Bad examples for sustainability – Plovdiv case, Bulgaria

Good examples:

participatory planning and implementation – Magdolna case, Budapest

Staircase model for integration – Dolny Kubin, Slovakia

Legalisation – Naga City; Bulgaria

Social mix – tenure mix, Netherlenland (Utrecht, Haga), France (Lyon)

Metropolitan Research Institute


  • Login