1 / 15

Well Chamber Response as a Function of Pressure

Well Chamber Response as a Function of Pressure. Sheridan L. Griffin Tim D. Bohm John A. Micka Larry A. DeWerd. University of Wisconsin Medical Radiation Research Center Department of Medical Physics.

Download Presentation

Well Chamber Response as a Function of Pressure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Well Chamber Response as a Function of Pressure Sheridan L. Griffin Tim D. Bohm John A. Micka Larry A. DeWerd University of Wisconsin Medical Radiation Research Center Department of Medical Physics

  2. Air-communicating chambers must be corrected to standard atmospheric temperature (22oC) and pressure (760 Torr or 1 atm) using: At high altitudes for low-energy photons (20 – 100 keV) this correction was found to be insufficient. Truly an air density effect. Introduction • This work investigated an additional correction factor for these types of ionization chambers to be applied after CTP.

  3. Apparatus &Technique

  4. Sources in Use • High-energy photon sources: • Iridium-192 (192Ir) • Cesium-137 (137Cs) • Beta sources: • Strontium-90 (90Sr) • Phosphorous-32 (32P) • Low-energy photon sources: • Palladium-103 (103Pd) • Iodine-125 (125I) with a silver substrate • Iodine-125 (125I) without a silver substrate

  5. Chambers in Use • Two similarly-designed air-communicating well chambers with aluminum collecting electrodes and with aluminum foil lining the inner wall (rough schematic shown at right) • One pressurized (argon) well chamber • One custom RPC-constructed air-communicating well chamber made of C552 conducting plastic

  6. High-Energy Photons in Air-Communicating Chambers • The standard CTP correction is sufficient to normalize chamber response to standard atmospheric pressure

  7. Beta Radiation in Air-Communicating Chambers • The standard CTP correction is sufficient to normalize the responses of the chambers to beta emitting sources (90Sr, 32P) Photons in Pressurized Chambers • When used with photon sources the pressurized chamber needs no CTP correction and exhibits the same response regardless of the ambient pressure

  8. Beta Radiation in Pressurized Chambers • The response of pressurized chambers is not constant • May be due to decreased attenuation of the betas by the low-pressure air

  9. Low-Energy Photons in Air-Communicating Chambers • Applying only CTP over-corrects the response • The over-correction increases in magnitude as the photon energy decreases

  10. Proposed Altitude Correction, CA • The altitude correction is: where the proposed coefficients for the two chambers used in this experiment are: • Making the total correction for temperature and pressure:

  11. Monte Carlo Simulation • One air-communicating chamber was modeled • modeled with MCNP v4c3 transport code with updated photon cross sections • also modeled with DOSRZnrc user code from the EGSnrc code system • Initial investigation with bare point sources • Followed up with models of the seeds used • Results differ at most at 560 Torr by 3.1% (103Pd) and 2.3% (125I w/ silver substrate)

  12. Validation of Monte Carlo Analysis • Aluminum walls play a strong role in the over response • Calculations indicate a 2.3% improvement at 560 Torr with modification • Modified chamber exhibited a 3.1% decrease in over-response at 560 Torr • An RPC chamber was also experimentally tested

  13. Conclusion • The correction factor for ambient pressure, CA, was determined for two air-communicating re-entrant ionizing well chambers with aluminum components. • The CA correction should be used for the majority of chambers in clinical use and is especially important at higher altitudes. • Air-communicating chambers do not require correction for high-energy photons or beta radiation. • Plastic chambers such as the RPC chamber do not appear to require correction beyond CTP.

  14. Future Work • More work using Monte Carlo calculations will be done to attempt to determine the cause of the pressure effect. • The effect of using various materials for the lining of the inner wall and the collecting electrode will be investigated. • Further investigation into the apparent over-response of pressurized chambers to beta emitting sources will be undertaken.

  15. My Thanks • I would like to thank Paul Cleven for his construction of the the pressure vessel and Ben Palmer for his assistance with the beta sources.

More Related