Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 14

Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 121 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology. Vikas Arya HSCI 740 Spring 2004 May 22,2004. Need to answer four questions when considering new technology for your organization: Should the organization invest in this technology? What are the associated risks and benefits?

Download Presentation

Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology l.jpg

Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology

Vikas Arya

HSCI 740 Spring 2004

May 22,2004


Slide2 l.jpg

Need to answer four questions when considering new technology for your organization:

  • Should the organization invest in this technology?

  • What are the associated risks and benefits?

  • What is the impact on patient outcomes?

  • What is the Return on Investment to the organization?

    Use both qualitative and quantitative models to answer these questions and justify spending for new technology.

    These models will impact optimal expenditure policies within the organization and identify optimal technology policies at national and international health levels.

    Outcomes-based approach views results against inputs to justify spending for new technology.


Challenges to it implementation in healthcare l.jpg

Challenges to IT implementation in Healthcare

  • Costs: Manufacturing and Marketing to develop new technology

  • Competing priorities: Senior management and hospital boards need budgetary justification.

  • Culture: Clinicians must buy into the technology.

  • Confidence: Patients may be skeptical. (e.g. EMR security)

  • Consistent: Government regulation forces standards.


Micro economic principles used to evaluate healthcare expenditures l.jpg

Micro-Economic principles used to evaluate Healthcare expenditures.

  • Crowding out effects: The larger a particular segment of a budget portfolio is, the lesser resources available for other activities. (Fig. 1)

    Capital assignment varies by organization.

    2. Cost effective care: Technology is costly only if it is not offset y proportionate improvements in outcomes. Justify costs through results.


Economics basis for outcomes evaluation l.jpg

Economics Basis for Outcomes Evaluation

  • “Full” considers inputs, (costs) AND outputs, (outcomes).

    Vs.

  • “Partial” considers inputs, (costs) OR outputs, (outcomes).

    Also done at several levels:

  • Cost-Identification (identify costs)

  • Cost-Effectiveness (compare strategies with outcomes using neutral units.)

  • Cost-Utility (Outcomes in quality-adjusted life years.)

  • Cost-Benefit (Use monetary units for comparison.)


Principles of outcomes evaluation l.jpg

Principles of Outcomes Evaluation

  • Donabedian Model uses the “structure-process-outcome” relationship for outcomes evaluation framework.

  • Micro Level studies (within the organization) vs. Macro Level (larger scale like state or country)

Outcomes

Research

Clinical Outcomes

(narrow focus)

Health Services

(broad focus)


Slide8 l.jpg

  • By itself, “Outcomes Research” is an analytic tool, (e.g. analyze a type of technology).

  • Combined with Management Science and Quality Management, it transforms to “Outcomes Management”, a strategy tool (e.g. how does adopting a certain technology impact the organization or larger system).


Techniques for technology evaluation l.jpg

Techniques for Technology Evaluation

  • Demonstrate added value: Directly impacts clinical and/or business outcomes or indirectly impacts outcomes by enhancing strategic plan.

  • Investment Models:

    Weill Broadbent Information Technology Portfolio and Business Value Model evaluates technology in regards to:

  • Infrastructure (business integration)

  • Transactional (reducing costs)

  • strategic (marketing position/competitive advantage)

  • informational (better information)

    Constructive Technology Assessment Model:

    Discussions between manufacturers, developers, researchers, and users of technology being developed.


Slide10 l.jpg

Techniques for Technology Evaluation

3. Measure Costs and Benefits:

Costs

  • Charges: Rate setting and converting resources to department costs.

  • Accounting costs: Estimate the break even point.

  • Economic costs: Marginal cost of providing more units of service vs. not providing.

  • Direct: Patient care

  • Indirect: Overhead

  • Opportunity: Lost opportunities (e.g. patient wages)

    Benefits

  • Objective measures: Length of stay, functional outcomes, quality of life tools

  • Subjective measures: Patient satisfaction, quality of care


Slide11 l.jpg

Techniques for Technology Evaluation

4. Estimating Return On Investment:

  • Accounting Definition:

    (Net Income/Investment)x100= ROI

  • Technology Definition:

    It is the “added-value” to the system. Remember that the outcomes or results are compared against the initial costs or investments. This is the outcomes bases approach.


Example of technology evaluation l.jpg

Example of Technology Evaluation

  • Type of technology: Picture archival and communication system (PAC) is being evaluated.

  • Method: Decision analytic model related to organizational impact of invest/no invest was interfaced with the Weill Broadbent IT portfolio model to develop a quantitative model.

  • Sources of data were: physician needs, satisfaction survey performed on the community as well as sensitivity analysis for discount rates and net present value of costs and benefits projected into the future.

  • Results: institution-specific report the quantifies implications of investing or not in PAC and level of risk associated with each decision.


What have you learned l.jpg

What have you learned?

  • Simply stated, what is the outcomes-based approach?

  • From an IT perspective, what is ROI?

  • Ask these four questions when considering investment in a new technology.

  • The economic principle of “cost effective” care compares inputs, (costs) against what?

  • Name the 5 C’s (challenges) to implementing IT in the healthcare setting.


References l.jpg

References

  • Sachdeva, Ramesh C. MD,Phd,MBA. Measuring the impact of new technology: An outcomes-based approach. Critical Care Medicine. 2001;29(8):N190-N195.


  • Login