1 / 20

Ryan Milligan (CUA/NASA-GSFC)

Enhanced Particle Acceleration During a Plasmoid-Looptop Collision Observed with RHESSI and STEREO. Ryan Milligan (CUA/NASA-GSFC) Collaborators: R. T. James McAteer (TCD), Brian R. Dennis (NASA/GSFC) & C. Alex Young (Adnet/NASA-GSFC). Outline. What is a plasmoid?

prestong
Download Presentation

Ryan Milligan (CUA/NASA-GSFC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhanced Particle Acceleration During a Plasmoid-Looptop Collision Observed with RHESSI and STEREO • Ryan Milligan (CUA/NASA-GSFC) • Collaborators: R. T. James McAteer (TCD), Brian R. Dennis (NASA/GSFC) & C. Alex Young (Adnet/NASA-GSFC)

  2. Outline • What is a plasmoid? • Predictions from numerical simulations • Overview of 25 Jan 2007 event as observed by RHESSI and STEREO • Discussion of X-ray source motions • CME kinematics • Summary

  3. Plasmoid formation • In the standard flare model magnetic reconnection occurs in the current sheet between an erupting CME and the underlying flare loop • The energy released during reconnection accelerates the CME, particles and heats the local plasma

  4. Plasmoid formation • It is possible that reconnection can occur multiple times along CS • Plasmoids form as magnetic ‘islands’ between X-points • Due to density and magnetic field strength decreasing with height, the majority of plasmoids are observed to rise

  5. Plasmoid formation • It is possible that reconnection can occur multiple times along CS • Plasmoids form as magnetic ‘islands’ between X-points • Due to density and magnetic field strength decreasing with height, the majority of plasmoids are observed to rise

  6. Simulations of Plasmoid Formation • Barta et al. (2008) developed a 2D numerical simulation of plasmoid formation during CME eruption • Upward (top row), downward (middle row) and coalescing (bottom row) plasmoids form during CS tearing • The merging of the downward-moving plasmoid with the looptop results in additional energy release (red boxes) • This should be visible as chromospheric or HXR emission due to enhanced particle acceleration

  7. Plasmoid Motions • The direction of motion of the plasmoid depends on the relative reconnection rates above and below the source • This motion is driven by the magnetic tension in the field lines, which is governed by the rate of reconnection • Upward moving plasmoids have a greater reconnection rate below the source (v1B1<v2B2), while downward moving plasmoids have a greater reconnection rate above (v1B1>v2B2)

  8. 25 Jan 2007 • Eruptive Event (CME+C6 Flare) above eastern limb • Observed by STEREO-B and RHESSI • Flare footpoints were occulted • Long Duration Event

  9. 25 Jan 2007 • Eruptive Event (CME+C6 Flare) above eastern limb • Observed by STEREO-B and RHESSI • Flare footpoints were occulted • Long Duration Event

  10. RHESSI images at flare onset revealed a high-altitude coronal source at 5-10 keV (Plasmoid; 06:29 UT) • An underlying source brightened almost 10 minutes later (Looptop kernel that lay above post-flare arcade) • Plasmoid appeared to merge with looptop kernel between 06:37-06:41 UT

  11. During the rise phase of the flare, enhanced emission was detected in the 9-18 keV HXR lightcurves* from RHESSI • A similar feature was observed in the 245 MHz band from Learmonth Radio Telescope • Both are evidence for enhanced particle acceleration in the corona • This enhanced emission was concurrent with the time over which the two X-ray sources appeared to merge • Merging and enhanced emission both occurred around the time of peak CME acceleration *RHESSI photon spectrum during merging also implied that >9 keV emission is nonthermal

  12. Only one previous report of plasmoid-looptop merging(Kolomanski & Karlicky 2007) • Using Yohkoh and Ondrejov they found enhanced HXR and radio emission during merging • Velocity of downward moving source was 16 km/s; similar to our value of 12/km/s

  13. 12-10 keV 12-14 keV 14-16 keV • Previous RHESSI observations of rising plasmoids (e.g. Sui & Holman 2003) show that higher energy emission appears at lower altitudes (the reverse is true for looptop sources) • Evidence that reconnection occurred between it and the underlying looptop • K&K07 found no energy gradient in their plasmoid

  14. Imaging over finer energy bands (2 keV) reveals the energy gradient of the sources • Plasmoid source had higher energy emitting from higher altitudes • Looptop source showed no energy displacement with height Note that RHESSI and EUVI images were taken 15 minutes apart

  15. 10-12 keV 12-14 keV 14-16 keV • Rising plasmoids appear with higher energy emitted at lower altitudes • Downward-moving plasmoid shows higher energy at higher altitudes • This supports the idea that the dominant reconnection site generates greater magnetic tension in the field lines, thereby driving the plasmoid motion

  16. CME Kinematics • Height of the CME front was tracked as function of time (EUVI, COR1, COR2) • h(t) profile differentiated twice using 3-point Lagrangian method: v(t), a(t) • Downward motion of RHESSI plasmoid occurred during CME acceleration phase implying both were driven by the same reconnection in the CS

  17. Evidence for change in the accelerator..? • Early spectral analysis revealed distinct decrease in the low energy cutoff (EC) and increase in total electron flux during merging • This was only seen in one detector (#6) • Unreliable due to poorly known calibration in 2007 • Also possibly due to change in relative intensities of the two sources

  18. Summary • Evidence is presented for a downward-moving X-ray plasmoid merging with a looptop kernel during CME eruption - the first to be observed with RHESSI • Enhanced (coronal) HXR (9-18 keV) and radio (245 MHz) emission at the time of the merging suggests that additional particle acceleration took place due to a secondary reconnection process in the current sheet between the two sources • The velocity of the downward moving source is in agreement with a similar event observed with Yohkoh but much lower than that predicted by a 2D numerical simulation • The energy gradient along downward plasmoid is opposite to that observed in rising plasmoids suggesting that the dominant energy release site was above, rather than below, the source. • The merging occurred around the time of peak CME acceleration suggesting that current sheet tearing took place

  19. Future Work... • Is the evidence for a change in the low energy cutoff real? • Would like to see the same effect in multiple detectors at a time when the calibration is better known. • Does the inflow velocity greatly affect the magnetic tension force, and therefore, the plasmoid velocity and resulting energy released? • SDO/AIA data may help with this. • Is there evidence for chromospheric rebrightenings? • Models predict a secondary brightening at the footpoints as the plasmoid is tied to the same field lines.

  20. Least-squares fit to our downward-moving source yielded velocity of 12 km/s (similar to K&K07: 16 km/s) • Velocity predicted by Barta et al. 2008 is of the order of the Alfven speed (few hundred km/s) • Plasmoid velocity is dependent on the magnetic tension in the field lines, which is determined by the reconnection rate

More Related