1 / 21

Uncertainty in F cur (1) Assumed to follow a normal distribution;

Uncertainty in F cur (1) Assumed to follow a normal distribution; (2) Mean = 0.74 (equivalent to an annual exploitation rate of 52.3%); (3) CV = 30% (standard deviation = 0.222). Moderate uncertainty (Scenario I). Non-random uncertainty in M (with other parameters follow scenario I). Summary

Download Presentation

Uncertainty in F cur (1) Assumed to follow a normal distribution;

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Uncertainty in Fcur • (1) Assumed to follow a normal distribution; • (2) Mean = 0.74 (equivalent to an annual exploitation rate of 52.3%); • (3) CV = 30% (standard deviation = 0.222).

  2. Moderate uncertainty (Scenario I)

  3. Non-random uncertainty in M (with other parameters follow scenario I)

  4. Summary • If uncertainty is considered, the determination of the stock status will be influenced by (a) magnitudes and nature of variations in parameters in the EPR model, (b) variation associated with current fishing mortality estimate; (c) the decision confidence level • Natural mortality has a greater impacts on the estimation of P(Fcur > F10%) than growth parameters, a higher natural mortality is likely to reduce the likelihood of defining the fishery as overfished, and vice versa. • Chen, Y. and C. Wilson. 2002. A simulation study to evaluate impacts of uncertainty on the assessment of American lobster fishery in the Gulf of Maine. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 1394-1403

  5. (2) Bayesian stock assessment framework

  6. Data • Fishery-dependent data • catch size composition, CPUE, landings, sex ratio, proportion of V-notched lobster • Fishery-independent data • Survey size composition, survey index, sex ratio, proportion of V-notched lobster

  7. Biological data: • Growth data (tagging study): Size-specific molting frequency, size-specific increment/molt • Size-specific life-history and fishery processes • maturation, fecundity, gear selectivity, natural mortality • Environmental variables • temperature

  8. Models • Population dynamics models • Growth model; • Stock-recruitment model • Catch at size model; • V-notching model; • Maturation model; • (2) Observation models • Size-at-catch • Fishery CPUE • Survey abundance index • Size-at-survey • Sex ratio • Proportion of V-notched lobsters

  9. Growth model • Develop a growth transition matrix • (1) Individual-based approach • Probabilistic stepwise growth model • (2) Von Bertalanffy growth model

  10. (1) Individual based model

  11. (2) Von Bertalanffy growth model • Fit modified von Bertalanffy growth model to size increment – days-at-large data • Estimate three parameters K and L • Assume growth increment at Lk, LLk N(LLk , k2) • Estimate expected growth increment LLk at Lk • Calculate probability of growing from Lk to other size classes

  12. Dynamics models (1) Exploitation rate independent of size class

  13. Dynamics models (2) Exploitation rate dependent of size class

  14. Stock-recruitment model

  15. Predicted statistics

  16. Bayesian statistical estimator • Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation • Hastings-Metropolis algorithm • Codes developed using AD Model Builder • Half a million simulations will be run

  17. How stock assessment modeling works • A model fishery is generated using the models • The model fishery yields output including size composition of “catch” and “survey”, “fishery” CPUE, “survey” index, proportion of V-notched “lobster” and sex ratio observed in the “fishery” and “survey” • Using the Bayesian estimator to optimize the differences between model fishery outputs and data actually observed in the fishery and surveys • The optimization leads to the estimation of key fishery parameters that are required for the fishery management and risk analysis of alternative management strategies.

  18. (3) Evaluation and comparative study • Using Monte Carlo computer simulation approach • Simulate a lobster fishery using series of random Bernoulli trials in computer simulation with known parameters • Apply the new and other assessment models to the simulated fishery • Compare the estimated parameters with the built-in parameters for different models

  19. ENTER ith area Yes No Dies Naturally? Caught in fishery? Dies Naturally Record the size of the individual Is it legal? Dies from handing? Does it molt? Is it V-notched? Grows by how much? Need to be V-notched? V-notching Add to Spawning biomass Does it mature? Add to legal catch Move to which area?

  20. Thanks, questions?

More Related