1 / 121

Kaon and pion femtoscopy in the hydrokinetic model of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

Kaon and pion femtoscopy in the hydrokinetic model of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. Yu. M. Sinyukov Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kiev. Talk at the X GDRE Workshop “Heavy Ion with Ultrarelativistic Energies” SUBATRECH, Nantes, June 17 2010. OUTLOOK.

posy
Download Presentation

Kaon and pion femtoscopy in the hydrokinetic model of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Kaon and pion femtoscopy in the hydrokinetic model of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions Yu. M. Sinyukov Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kiev Talk at the X GDRE Workshop “Heavy Ion with Ultrarelativistic Energies” SUBATRECH, Nantes, June 17 2010

  2. OUTLOOK • 0.Evidences of collective/hydrodynamic behavior of the matter formed A+A . • I. Thermalization (is early thermalization really needed?), IC, HBT-puzzle and all • that… • II. The transition from very initial nonthermal state in HIC to • hydrodynamic stage. Phenomenological approach. • III. Matter evolution at chemically equilibrated stage. • IV. Matter evolution at non-equilibrated stage. HydroKinetic Model (HKM). • V. System’s decay and spectra formation. Whether it possible to apply Cooper-Frye prescription for continuously emitting and not equilibrated system? If possible, how? • VI. The HKM results for the top RHIC energies. Pion and kaon femtoscopy • VII. Energy dependence of the interferometry scales: SPS, RHIC, LHC

  3. The evidences of space-time evolution of the thermal matter in A+A collisions: • Rough estimate of the fireball lifetime for Au+Au Gev: In p+p all femto-scales are A+A is not some kind of superposition of the of order 1 fm ! individual collisions of nucleons of nuclei The phenomenon of space-time evolution of the strongly interacting matter in A+A collisions What is the nature of this matter atthe early collision stage? Whether does the matter becomes thermal? Particle number ratios are well reproduced inideal gas model with 2 parameters: T, for collision energies from AGS to RHIC: thermal+chemical equilibrium

  4. Collective expansion of the fireball. • Observation of the longitudinal boost-inv. expansion: • It was conformed by NA35/NA49 Collaborations (CERN), 1995 ! • Observation of transverse (radial) collective flows: Effective temperature for different particlespecies (non-relativistic case) : radial collective flow • Observation of elliptic flows: HYDRODYNAMICS !

  5. Expecting Stages of Evolution in Ultrarelativistic A+A collisions t Relatively small space-time scales (HBT puzzle) 8-20 fm/c Early thermal freeze-out: T_th Tch 150 MeV 7-8 fm/c Elliptic flows 1-3 fm/c Early thermalization at 0.5 fm/c 0.2?(LHC) or strings 7

  6. Pre-thermal transverse flow 8

  7. Collective velocities developed between =0.3 and =1.0 fm/c Central collisions Collective velocity developed at pre-thermal stage from proper time tau_0 =0.3 fm/c by supposed thermalization time tau_th = 1 fm/c for scenarios of partonic freestreaming and free expansion of classical field. The results are compared with thehydrodynamic evolution of perfect fluid with hard equation of state p = 1/3 epsilon startedat.Impact parameter b=0. Yu.S. Acta Phys.Polon. B37 (2006) 3343; Gyulassy, Yu.S., Karpenko, Nazarenko Braz.J.Phys. 37 (2007) 1031. Yu.S., Nazarenko, Karpenko: Acta Phys.Polon. B40 1109 (2009) .

  8. Collective velocities and their anisotropy developed between =0.3 and =1.0 fm/c Non-central collisions b=6.3 fm Collective velocity developed at pre-thermal stage from proper time =0.3 fm/c by supposed thermalization time tau_i = 1 fm/c for scenarios of partonic freestreaming. The results are compared with thehydrodynamic evolution of perfect fluid with hard equation of state p = 1/3 epsilon startedat.Impact parameter b=6.3 fm.

  9. Basic ideas for the early stage: developing of pre-thermal flows Yu.S. Acta Phys.Polon. B37 (2006) 3343; Gyulassy, Yu.S., Karpenko, Nazarenko Braz.J.Phys. 37 (2007) 1031. For nonrelativistic gas For thermal and non-thermal expansion at : Hydrodynamic expansion: gradient pressure acts So, even if : and Free streaming: Gradient of density leads to non-zero collective velocities In the case of thermalization at later stage it leads to spectra anisotropy 11

  10. Summary-1 Yu.S., Nazarenko, Karpenko: Acta Phys.Polon. B40 1109 (2009) • The initial transverse flow in thermal matter as well as its anisotropy are developed at pre-thermal - either partonic, string or classical field (glasma) - stage with even more efficiency than in the case of very early perfect hydrodynamics. • Such radial and elliptic flows develop no matter whether a pressure already established. The general reason for them is an essential finiteness of the system in transverse direction. • The anisotropy of the flows transforms into asymmetry of the transverse momentum spectra only of (partial) thermalization happens. • So, the results, first published in 2006, show that whereas the assumption of (partial) thermalization in relativistic A + A collisions is really crucial to explain soft physics observables, the hypotheses of early thermalization at times less than 1 fm/c is not necessary.

  11. Phenomenological model of pre-thermal evolution Akkelin, Yu.S. PRC81, 064901 (2010) Matching of nonthermal initial conditions and hydrodynamic stage • If some model (effective QCD theory) gives us the energy-momentum tensor at time , one can estimate the flows and energy densities at expected time of thermalization , using hydrodynamic equation with (known) source terms. • This phenomenological approach is motivated by Boltzmann equations, accounts for the energy and momentum conservation laws and contains two parameters: supposed time of thermalization and “initial” relaxation time . Eqs: IC: where

  12. HydroKinetic Model (HKM) of A+A collisions I. Matter evolution in chemically equilibrated space-time zone 14

  13. Locally (thermally & chemically) equilibrated evolution and initial conditions (IC) t Tch IC for central Au+Au collisions The “effective" initial distribution is the one which being used in the capacity of initial condition bring the average hydrodynamic results for fluctuating initial conditions: x is Glauber-like profile I. Initial rapidity profiles: where II. is CGC-like profile and are only fitting parameters in HKM

  14. Equation of state in (almost) equilibrated zone EoS from LattQCD (in form proposed by Laine & Schroder, Phys. Rev. D73, 2006). MeV Crossover transition, LattQCD is matched with an ideal chemically equilibrated multicomponent hadron resonance gas at Particle number ratios F. Karsch, PoS CPOD07:026, 2007 are baryon number and strangeness susceptibilities 16

  15. HKM II. Evolution of the hadronic matter in non-equlibrated zone. t Decay of the system and spectra formation Tch x

  16. “Soft Physics” measurements A x Landau, 1953 t ΔωK Cooper-Frye prescription (1974) A p=(p1+ p2)/2 q= p1- p2 QS correlation function Space-time structure of the matter evolution: Long p1 p Out p2 BW Side 18

  17. Cooper-Frye prescription (CFp) t t z r • CFp gets serious problems: • Freeze-out hypersurface contains non-space-like • sectors • artificial discontinuities appears across • Sinyukov (1989), Bugaev (1996), Andrelik et al (1999); • cascade models show that particles escape from the system about whole time of its evolution. Hybrid models (hydro+cascade) and the hydro method of continuous emission starts to develop.

  18. Hybrid models: HYDRO + UrQMD (Bass, Dumitru (2000)) t t t UrQMD HYDRO z r The initial conditions for hadronic cascade models should be based on non-local equilibrium distributions • The problems: • the system just after hadronization is not so dilute to apply hadronic cascade models; • hadronization hypersurface contains non-space-like sectors (causality problem: Bugaev, PRL 90, 252301, 2003); • The average energy density and pressure of input UrQMD gas should coincide with what the hadro gas has just before switching. • At r-periphery of space-like hypsurf. the system is far from l.eq.

  19. Possible problems of matching hydro with initially bumping IC RIDGES? The example of boost-invariant hydroevolution for the bumping IC with four narrow high energy density tubes (r= 1 fm) under smooth Gaussian background (R=5.4 fm)

More Related