1 / 14

Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative – year three

Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative – year three. CYCLING WORKING GROUP Experts: Oliver Hatch & Pascal van Den Noort Velo Mondial Rapporteur: Katherine McWilliam, TTR. Year two – participating cities. Six cities in year two; Aalborg, Brescia, Copenhagen, Glasgow, Malmö, & Prague.

portia
Download Presentation

Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative – year three

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative – year three CYCLING WORKING GROUP Experts: Oliver Hatch & Pascal van Den Noort Velo Mondial Rapporteur: Katherine McWilliam, TTR

  2. Year two – participating cities Six cities in year two; Aalborg, Brescia, Copenhagen, Glasgow, Malmö, & Prague.

  3. Modal share and cordon count

  4. Now on to year three… Four parts to this presentation • Results of what we have done Yr 1& Yr2 • Looking for new cities to join the group • Ideas for new themes • Ideas for ways to work

  5. Cycling WG. Year 1 highlights • A lot of work done in a short time to get the group going • Research questions were: • mainstreaming cycling • role of infrastructure & marketing • barriers to cycling

  6. Cycling WG. Year 1 highlights Continued… • Links to indicators used in other projects • Useful results achieved in the timescale

  7. Cycling WG. Year 2 highlights • More cities added to the group • More detailed work on Yr 1 indicators

  8. Cycling WG. Year 2 highlights Continued… • Research questions: • Marketing • measuring effects of policies • integrating cycling with public transport modes • Joint working group meeting with PT • Desire to build on this in year 3

  9. Looking for new cities to join • Currently have 5 cities, but more would be welcomed. • Welcome to London and The Hague who are joining the group for year three • Have approached other cities and projects & there is interest

  10. Ideas for new themes & actions • Accept proposed new year 3 theme of ‘cycling as a component of joined-up urban transport journeys (cycle-walk-PT)’ • Develop cycle-public transport joint indicators, on intermodality, best practise and practical ways to work together

  11. Ideas for new themes & actions Continued… • Develop our work on marketing • Develop a model cycle policy monitoring & evaluation template • Develop potential for school travel plans

  12. Ideas for new ways to work • Agree with proposal to have a joint site visit/s with the PT working group • Also invite PT operators to join cycling WG and its meetings with a view to improving ‘joined-up journeys’

  13. Ideas for new ways to work Continued… • Focus on more cities rather than more indicators • Log useful indicators for which data does not exist

  14. Want to know more? Contact Katherine McWilliam (working group rapporteur) E-mail: katherine.mcwilliam@ttr-ltd.com Phone: +44 (0) 115 941 1141

More Related