1 / 30

Trafficking in a drug of dependence

Trafficking in a drug of dependence. Case study for VELS. 1. What is sentencing?. What laws guide a judge when sentencing?. Photo: John French / Courtesy of The Age. Chief Justice Marilyn Warren of the Supreme Court of Victoria. Who is responsible for sentencing?.

poitra
Download Presentation

Trafficking in a drug of dependence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Trafficking in a drugof dependence Case study for VELS

  2. 1. What is sentencing? What laws guidea judge when sentencing? Photo: John French / Courtesy of The Age Chief Justice Marilyn Warren of the Supreme Court of Victoria Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  3. Who is responsible for sentencing? In Australia, responsibility for sentencing is spread among three groups Courts ~ interpret the laws ~ Parliament ~ makes the laws ~ Government ~ puts laws into operation ~ • Creates offences and decides what the maximum penalties will be • Makes the rules that the courts must apply to cases • Sets up punishments for judges and magistrates to use • Apply the law within the framework set up by parliament • Set specific sentences for individual offenders • Correctional authorities (e.g. prisons) – control offenders after sentencing • Adult Parole Board – supervises offenders who are on parole Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  4. Where is sentencing law found? • Sentencing Act 1991 • Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 • Common law – previous court judgments • Various Acts and Regulations creating particular offences, for example: • Crimes Act 1958 deals with a range of crimes, including injury offences • Road Safety Act 1986 deals with a range of driving offences, including drink driving and drug driving Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  5. Types of sentences Most severe • Imprisonment • Drug treatment order • Community correction order • Fine • Adjourned undertaking Least severe Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  6. 2. Sentencing theory What must a judge consider when deciding what sentence to impose? Source: Victorian Sentencing Manual, Judicial College of Victoria Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  7. Purposes of sentencing Just punishment Community protection Deterrence PURPOSES OF SENTENCING Denunciation Rehabilitation These are the ONLY purposes for which sentences can be given Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Sentencing Act 1991 s 5(1)

  8. Principle of parsimony Parsimony ~ extreme care when imposing punishment ~ Where a choice of punishment exists,the judge should take care to choosethe least severe option that will achieve the purposes of sentencing Example - If there is a choice between imposing a fineor a community correction order, a fine should be imposedprovided it meets the purposes of sentencing Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Sentencing Act 1991 ss 5(3) (7)

  9. Factors that must be considered Factors that must be consideredwhen sentencing Maximum penalty & current sentencing practices Type of offence & how serious Circumstancesof the offender Victim Aggravating or mitigating factors Relevant Acts of Parliament & previouscourt decisions Factors making the crime worse, intention, effects, method, motive, weapons, role the offender played Prior offences, age, character,& mental state.Alcohol, drug, orgambling addiction. Personal crisis, guilty plea Impact of crime on victim (e.g. psychological or physical trauma), material or financial loss Factors that increase or lessen theseriousnessof the crime Victim Impact Statement Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Sentencing Act 1991 s 5(2)

  10. Victim Impact Statements • If a court finds a person guilty, a victim of the offence may make a Victim Impact Statement (VIS) • A VIS contains details of any injury, loss, or damage suffered by the victim as a direct result of the offence • A person who has made a VIS can request that it be read aloud during the sentencing hearing Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  11. How long is a sentence? Cumulativesentences for two or more crimes that run one after the other, e.g. two x five-year prison sentences served cumulatively = 10 years in prison Concurrentsentences for two or more crimes that run at the same time, e.g. two x five-year prison sentences served concurrently = five years in prison The total effective sentence (TES) (or head sentence)  the total imprisonment sentence for all offences within a case, after orders making sentences cumulative or concurrent Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  12. Non-parole period • Parole is the prisoner’s release from prison before the end of his or her total possible prison sentence, subject to conditions (e.g. regular reporting to a parole officer) • A non-parole period: • is set by the court • is the part of the sentence that must be served in prison • must be set by the court for sentences of two years or more • may or may not be set for sentences of one to two years • is not set if the sentence is less than one year Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  13. What istrafficking in a drugof dependence? What is themaximum penalty? 3. The crime and the time Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  14. Trafficking in a drug of dependence A person who, without being authorised by or licensed under this Act or the regulations to do so, trafficks or attempts to traffick in a drug of dependence is guilty of an indictable offence Maximum penalty The maximum penalty for trafficking in a drug of dependence is Level 4 imprisonment (maximum 15 years’ imprisonment) and/or a fine of 1,800 penalty units Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 s 71AC

  15. What does ‘traffick’ mean? • Traffick • To prepare a drug of dependence for trafficking • To manufacture a drug of dependence or • To sell, exchange, agree to sell, offer for sale, or have in possession for sale a drug of dependence • Drug of dependence • A drug that is contained in Schedule 11 of the Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981.Over 120 different drugs are listed in this Schedule • Traffickable quantity • In the case of pseudoephedrine 100 grams Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 ss 3 and 70

  16. Trafficking in a drug of dependence  people sentenced Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  17. Trafficking in a drug of dependence – sentence types Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  18. Length of imprisonment Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  19. Age & gender of people sentenced Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  20. What arethe facts ofthis case? 4. The case Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  21. The offender • Terri was 19 at the time of the offence • She has been found guilty of one count of trafficking in a drug of dependence • The offending was initiated by Terri’s mother Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  22. The crime 1 Terri and her mum came to Melbourne for a week’s holiday They drove around Melbourne and Geelong in a hire car buying packets of decongestant tablets from pharmacies Terri would enter the pharmacy, buy one to four boxes of tablets, and return to the car with tablets and receipts They had an agreement to sell the tablets for $20 a box Their actions aroused suspicions and a number of pharmacies reported them to the police Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  23. The crime 2 The police intercepted them when they returned the car to the hire company The police recovered 3,263 tablets that had been removed from their packets and packed in a shopping bag and a plastic container with a misleading label The tablets contained enough pseudoephedrine (321 grams) to make between 145 and 232 grams of methylamphetamine Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  24. Factors for consideration • Terri has not been convicted before • She works in casual employment in the hospitality industry and is involved in a sports club as a coach, vice-captain, and fundraiser • The judge accepted that she may not have realised that she was trafficking in a drug of dependence, because the tablets could be readily bought without a prescription • Terri pleaded guilty at an early stage and was cooperative from the moment of her arrest • Terri feels genuine remorse for what she has done Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  25. What sentence would you give? 5. The sentence Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Photo: Department of Justice & Regulation

  26. You decide … • What sentence would you give? • If imprisonment, what would be the total effective sentence and the non-parole period? • If a community correction order, what would be the length of the order? What conditions? • If a fine, what would be the amount of the fine? Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  27. Trafficking in a drug of dependence A person who, without being authorised by or licensed under this Act or the regulations to do so, trafficks or attempts to traffick in a drug of dependence is guilty of an indictable offence Penalty: Level 4 imprisonment and/or fine (maximum 15 years’ imprisonment and/or 1,800 penalty units) Terri is guilty of one count of trafficking in a drug of dependence and could receive: possible maximum imprisonment of 15 years possible maximum fine of 1,800 penalty units The maximum penalty Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 s 71AC

  28. What the judge decided • Terri’s case, County Court • 12 months community correction order and120 hours unpaid community work • Judge’s comments • ‘You are a youthful offender and, thus, your rehabilitation is a significant factor for me to consider in sentencing you on this offence’ Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  29. Order in addition to sentence • As well as the sentence imposed on Terri,the judge ordered that a sample of her DNA be taken Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015

  30. 6. Conclusion Effective sentencing achieves a balance between the interests of society, the concerns of the victim, and the best interests of the offender The more information society has about crimes and the people involved in them, the more reasonable it is in its demands about sentencing Sentencing Advisory Council, 2015 Photo: Department of Justice & Regulation

More Related