1 / 20

Persistent attacks on Packaging Materials Addressing Challenges Together

This overview discusses the ongoing battles and challenges faced by packaging materials, specifically plastics, in India. It explores the past attacks on packaging materials, the NGT case and its impact, and AIPMA's progress. The article also provides options and insights for addressing these challenges, including industry-wide campaigns and common messages for the public. It highlights the advantages of plastic packaging and the need for collaboration between various stakeholders.

plyler
Download Presentation

Persistent attacks on Packaging Materials Addressing Challenges Together

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Persistent attacks on Packaging Materials Addressing Challenges Together

  2. OVERVIEW • Brief on past to understand pattern of attacks.. • Brief on NGT Case and purviews • AIPMA’s progress • Options with us – view point • Industry wide campaign – originators, users and recyclers • Inputs for campaigns & individual participation • Industry inputs ! • Technical Insights • Common Messages for public • Effect of replacing plastics • Possible forward path

  3. Brief of battles … • Several writ-petitions challenging use of Plastic/PET filed since ‘12 by NGOs • Initial cases mainly on use of Plastics in liquor. • Several simultaneous writs in high-courts and finally in Supreme court • After a thrash in courts, an NGO by name Him Jagriti Uttaranchal started pursuing through govt. mechanism • Y2012 raised concern on use of Plastics/PET for packing for liquid oral syrups • This drove to gazette notification seeking ban of Plastics/PET for Pharma • Y2014: case at NGT seeking ban on environmental & leachates from packaging • Succeeded in driving the current court notification. • Strategy seem to be first malign image in the minds of public • Use sentiment to drive authorities for banning plastics

  4. NGT …. • Court order which reads as banning “multi-layered plastics / PET” gets through would effect almost all products ! • Toothpastes, cosmetics, toiletries • Beverages • Everything under the sun ? • If the case gets shabbier, may lead to … • Banning of plastics - which could be a mammoth task • May drive for additional duties on polymer packaging • From the sequence of events and feelers, • Competing materials is pursuing these for commercial gains • Looking at perseverance, there could be more surprises! • Need of the hour for connect between all associations / industry • Brand-Owners/Packaging Materials/Raw material manufacturers/Others

  5. Recently raised Concerns about PET Packaging • Formaldehyde & Acetaldehyde • DEHP and other Phthalate based plasticizers • PET i.e Polyethylene Terephthalate. • Misunderstood PET contains phthalates {DOP/DEHP} • Antimony • Migration at high temperatures • Colourants • Bisphenol-A • Oestrogenic reactivity Most of the above hazards are wrongly attributed to PET 5

  6. AIPMA progress so far • Initial case • Between Union of India & Himjagriti. • Subsequently AIPMA was impeded • Mr. Kundan Mishra, an advocate experienced with cases related to plastic was engaged • Technical Back-up • Professor D.D Kale was engaged for technical inputs. • ICPE • Rendered support on environment related points

  7. Common Message that Brands can leave:

  8. Advantages - Plastics • Ships MORE with LESS packaging material. • Plastics can extend and enhance: • Freshness, minimizes spoilage and breakage, • Saves energy and Reduces waste.  • Financial status of poor farmers as agro products reach the consumer faster and fresh. • Use of plastics in drip-irrigation • Helped green revolution. • Plastics in healthcare • Allowed the medicines to reach even the remote places in rural area. • Environment-Friendliness • Plastics Packaging has one of the lowest CFP’s

  9. Advantages - Plastics • Plastic jars • Can use up to ~90 % less material by weight vs glass counterparts. • Plastic containers • Can use about 38 % less material than similarly sized steel cans. • Plastic or plastic-and-foil composites • An extremely lightweight, flexible packaging can use up to 80 percent less material than traditional bag-in-box packages. In India, about 30% of perishables are lost during transit. Plastic materials help to reduce these transit losses. (Advanced technologies such as MAP etc offer further value-addition)

  10. Light-weighting : Source Reduction • 1kg of plastics can deliver roughly 150 liters of beverages, compared to 1.5kg of aluminum, 4kg of steel or more than 20kgs of glass. • Lighter packaging means less fuel is used in shipping. • Plastic bags require less total energy to produce than paper bags and conserve fuel in shipping • One truckload for plastic bags versus seven for paper.

  11. Reuse • Plastics packaging’s durability enables  • reusability in storage bins, • sealable food containers and • refillable sports bottles. • Use of tetra packs and similar multilayer packaging material allows • storage of perishable products such as milk over few days • without refrigeration which is very helpful for rural India. • 90 percent of Indian’s report that they reuse plastic bottles. • Energy Conservation and Less CFP’s

  12. Recycling • Recycling varies from place to place, but most community curbside programs recycle plastic bottles—many now recycle other plastic containers

  13. Recycling By the Numbers GLASS PET • Total Consumption: 700KTA • Total Recycled: 70-75% i.e approx. 500KTA • Total Consumption: 1.2 mn TPA • Total Recycled: 0.86 mn TPA • 1Ton CO2 = 6 Tons of Recycled Glass container • By 2025, • Glass Composition: 2% - 3% • Total Bottles Recycled: 50-75 million • Recycling: • Strapping & Sheet: 2% - 3% • Fibers : 97% - 98% • Eg. Levi’s clothing • By 2025, • Plastic Composition: 4% - 5% SOURCE: GLASS- Glassplex, March-2015

  14. Energy recovery Hydrocarbons that make up most plastic packaging are a source of energy. • Replacing plastics with alternative materials would: • Require the use of 57 percent more energy. • Produce 61 percent more greenhouse gas emissions. • Common plastic foodservice products supply more than 16,000 BTUs (similar to big burner on a stove) per kg in a “waste-to-energy” facility.  • That’s approximately twice as much energy per kilo as coal. • Rather than burying this stored energy in landfills, communities can recapture it.

  15. Sustainability • Reduction of Greenhouse gas emissions by: • A plastic pouch: • Reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 77 percent compared to a steel can; • Plastic milk • One-third compared to alternatives; • Plastic brick coffee package • 68 to 76 percent compared to a steel can. Source: American Chemical Council

  16. Recycling - Advantages • By recycling plastics • Energy is available for new products or for other purposes like heating and cooling our homes. • For example, more than 20million tons of plastics recycling will • Save enough energy to heat more than 2.1 million homes. • Plastic sachets for milk/edible oil/ biscuits/peanuts/jams/jellies/shampoos,.. • Available to poor people in rural India at affordable costs. • 200million people across the globe use PET and tetra packs • For different products across spectrum of end-use sectors.

  17. Replacing plastic packaging with non-plastic alternatives for packaging would: • REQUIRE • 4.5 times as much packaging material by weight • INCREASE • The amount of packaging used by nearly 55 million tons. • Energy use by 80 percent equivalent to the energy from 91 Oil supertankers. • RESULT • In 130 percent more global warming potential • Equivalent  to adding 15.7 million more cars to our roads. Some of the food products/drinking water/medicines etc. would not be able to reach poor farmers.

  18. Possible Forward Path • Plastic waste management Work • Should be responsibility of municipal corporations. • All stake holders, can offer help in • Developing logistics etc. to the municipal corporation if necessary. • Brands can play an active role in educating the consumers. • Training Programmes to schools • Specific Collection Centers • Linkage with a social cause. • Scope of their CSR initiatives • Media • To work out strategy

  19. THANK YOU

More Related