1 / 44

PRESENTATION ON REVISED NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT: Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations

Environmental Quality. Environmental quality is improved and protected via proactive and reactive measures:Proactive Prevention of degradation and conservation Tools

piper
Download Presentation

PRESENTATION ON REVISED NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT: Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    2. Environmental quality is improved and protected via proactive and reactive measures: Proactive Prevention of degradation and conservation Tools – Strategic Planning, Environmental Impact Assessment. Reactive Rehabilitation of degraded areas, Reduction of emissions and effluent, clean-up Tools – NEMA sector Acts, Water legislation, Compliance and Enforcement.

    3. Systematic process to identify potential positive and negative impacts on the environment (biophysical, socio-economic, cultural) associated with proposed activity. Examine alternatives / management measures to minimise negative and optimise positive consequences. Prevent substantial detrimental to the environment

    4. Advantages of EIA To authorities: Informed decision making; Improvement / protection of environmental quality; Management to sustainable utilisation of resources; Understanding demands on bulk services, waste management services, urban forms, etc.

    5. Advantages of EIA (cont) To interested and affected parties An opportunity to be heard; Protecting environmental rights; Utilisation of local and indigenous knowledge; Increased knowledge and environmental awareness

    6. Advantages of EIA (cont) To developers of identified activities: Proactively asking the right questions Adequacy of natural resources Risks associated with environmental factors (geologic stability, hydrology regimes, fire, etc) Pollution potential and prevention thereof; Energy and water saving and associated financial savings Appropriateness of activity in terms of strategic planning for the area

    7. EIA in its design is aimed at informing project planning and design – unfortunately, often used to justify what is already planned instead.

    9. EIA became law in 1997, before then, voluntary use of EIA. Concurrent function between national and provincial government. Survey conducted amongst all provinces during March 2006 to establish status quo of SA EIA System

    13. The provinces received a total of 43 423 applications for EIA authorisation between September 1997 and March 2006. Of these applications 35 536 have been finalised and 3 097 withdrawn. This means that at least 4 790 applications are still current These current applications fall into three categories: Dormant applications – where authorities await action from the applicant Applications awaiting authority action – still within reasonable time frames Backlog – applications awaiting action and being delayed by authorities

    14. Whilst approximately 50% of applications are finalised within 6 months from the application date and an additional 33% within a year, it is of concern that approximately 9% is only finalised within a period of 2 years or more Although often related to complexity, controversy and pollution potential, delay in review and decision making processes also in cases due to severe capacity constraints within provincial authorities

    16. Lessons learnt through implementation of the 1997 EIA Regulations and evolution of Environmental Legislation since 1997 necessitated the review of the EIA System.

    17. Inadequacies of 1997 Regulations include. Wide interpretation of activities resulting in inconsistent application by authorities To many small scale / insignificant activities made subject to EIA Lengthy and inflexible process, with to many “authority stops” / “decision points” Inadequate provisions for public consultation Not supported by strategic planning tools Enforcement measures generally weak The Review commenced in 2000 and resulted in the promulgation of new Regulations in terms of the NEMA during April 2006

    19. What has been retained but improved? …

    24. What is new …

    25. New additions Exclusions based on Policies and guidelines Environmental Management Frameworks Compliance and enforcement strengthened Regulation 6 allowing for cooperation agreements between authorities Site Environmental Management Plans structured Class applications

    26. Environmental Management Frameworks

    27. Environmental Management Framework Regulations prescribe process for compiling EMF and set minimum requirements for content Strategic tool where a geographical area is assessed: Status quo study in terms of inter alia biophysical environment, built environment and “planned” environment Desired state of environment defined Road map established to reach and maintain desired SOE

    28. EMF consist of “environmental control zones”; environmental management plan and environmental management policy Certain pre-determined activities when aligned with control zones, EMP and EM Policy are then excluded from EIA requirements EMF also useful as environmental input into SDF’s, precinct plans, etc.

    29. Sector guidelines

    30. Sector guidelines Regulations prescribe process for compiling and publication of Sector guidelines Sector guidelines are given teeth – applicants have to take it into consideration Sector guidelines can also be used for exclusions

    31. Class applications

    32. Class applications One application and process for many different activities occurring in one geographical area OR One application and process for the same activity type proposed to take place in different locations

    33. The processes and time frames associated with it

    34. Basic Assessment Process

    35. Activities contained in Listing Notice 1 are subject to a basic assessment process Smaller scale activities Predicted impacts are generally known and can be easily managed Will be further limited through exclusions

    37. Scoping and EIA process (thorough process)

    38. Activities contained in Listing Notice 2 are subject to a thorough assessment process Activities that due to nature and/or extent is likely to have significant impacts Associated with high levels of pollution / waste / environmental degradation Impacts cannot easily be predicted Higher risk activities

    42. NEMA EIA Regulations will come into effect for all activities except for those related to mining permits, licenses and permission will come into effect on 1 July 2006 Mining related activities will come into effect on 1 April 2007 due to Required law reform Development of cooperation structures and systems System reform Transitional arrangements provided for EIA processes currently underway in terms of 1997 EIA Regulations

    43. In conclusion…

    44. After lengthy consultative process, NEMA EIA Regulations finally ready to come into force and start making a difference. All the benefits of the new Regulations will not be immediately evident. We must be more realistic about appropriateness of IEM Tools and urgently develop other tools to supplement, complement and in some cases, replace EIA. Where more strategic approaches can be used, this should be explored and good quality base information is essential for this.

    45. Thank you

More Related