1 / 11

Logic Models

Handout 1. Logic Models. Handout 2. Morehouse’s Logic Model [handout]. Handout 3. YRBS 2009 Key Findings. Handout 4. YRBS 2009 Key Findings. Actions. Changes in behaviors and practices. Learning. Changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills, aspirations. Reactions.

piper
Download Presentation

Logic Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Handout 1 Logic Models

  2. Handout 2 Morehouse’s Logic Model [handout]

  3. Handout 3 YRBS 2009 Key Findings

  4. Handout 4 YRBS 2009 Key Findings

  5. Actions Changes in behaviors and practices Learning Changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills, aspirations Reactions Degree of satisfaction with program; level of interest; feelings toward activities, educational methods Participation Number and characteristics of people reached; frequency and intensity of contact Handout 5 Hierarchy of Effects Social-economic-environmental improvements Source: Bennett and Rockwell, 1995, Targeting Outcomes of Programs University of Wisconsin-Extension, Program Development and Evaluation

  6. Handout 6 Pulling it Together Data sources to document accomplishment

  7. Handout 7 Logic model and common types of evaluation Types of evaluation Process evaluation: How is program implemented? Are activities delivered as intended? Fidelity of implementation? Are participants being reached as intended? What are participant reactions? Needs/asset assessment: What are the characteristics, needs, priorities of target population? What are potential barriers/facilitators? What is most appropriate to do? Outcome evaluation: To what extent are desired changes occurring? Goals met? Who is benefiting/not benefiting? How? What seems to work? Not work? What are unintended outcomes? Impact evaluation: To what extent can changes be attributed to the program? What are the net effects? What are final consequences? Is program worth resources it costs? University of Wisconsin-Extension, Program Development and Evaluation

  8. Handout 8 Typical Activity Indicators to Track

  9. Parent Education Example: Evaluation Questions, Indicators Handout 9 Parents increase knowledge of child dev. Staff Develop parent ed curriculum Reduced stress Parents better understand their own parenting style Money Parents of 3-10 year- olds Parents identify appropriate actions to take Deliver series of 8 interactive sessions Partners Improved child-parent relations Parents gain skills in new ways to parent Parents use effective parenting practices Research Facilitate support groups Parents gain confidence in their abilities Strong families EVALUATION QUESTIONS How many sessions were held? How effectively? #, quality of support groups? Who/how many attended/did not attend? Did they attend all sessions? Supports groups? Were they satisfied – why/why not? To what extent did knowledge and skills increase? For whom? Why? What else happened? To what extent did behaviors change? For whom? Why? What else happened? To what extent is stress reduced? To what extent are relations improved? What amount of $ and time were invested? INDICATORS #,% demonstrating increased knowledge/skills Additional outcomes #,% demonstrating changes in behavior Types of changes #,% demonstrating improvements Types of improvements # Staff $ used # partners # Sessions held Quality criteria #,% attended per session Certificate of completion University of Wisconsin-Extension, Program Development and Evaluation

  10. Handout 10 Logic Model Resources Source: CDC Evaluation Working Group

  11. Handout 11 More Resources Source: CDC Evaluation Working Group

More Related