Diversification strategy
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

Diversification Strategy PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 244 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Diversification Strategy. OUTLINE. Introduction: The Basic Issues The Trend over Time Motives for Diversification - Growth and R isk Reduction - Shareholder Value: Porter’s Essential Tests Competitive Advantage from Diversification Diversification and Performance: Empirical Evidence

Download Presentation

Diversification Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Diversification strategy

Diversification Strategy

OUTLINE

  • Introduction: The Basic Issues

  • The Trend over Time

  • Motives for Diversification

    - Growth and Risk Reduction

    - Shareholder Value: Porter’s Essential Tests

  • Competitive Advantage from Diversification

  • Diversification and Performance: Empirical Evidence

  • Relatedness in Diversification


Diversification strategy

The Basic Issues in Diversification Decisions

Superior profit derives from two sources:

INDUSTRY

ATTRACTIVENESS

RATE OF PROFIT

>COST OF CAPITAL

COMPETITIVE

ADVANTAGE

  • Diversification decisions involve these same two issues:

  • How attractive is the sector to be entered?

  • Can the firm achieve a competitive advantage?


Diversifi cation among the us fortune 500 1949 74

Diversification among the US Fortune 500, 1949-74

70.2 63.5 53.7 53.9 39.9 37.0

29.8 36.5 46.3 46.1 60.1 63.0

Percentage of Specialized Companies (single-business,

vertically-integrated and dominant-business)

Percentage of Diversified Companies (related-business

and unrelated business)

Note:During the 1980s and 1990s the trend reversed as large

companies refocused upon their core businesses

1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974


Diversification strategy

Diversification among Large UK Corporations, 1950-93


Diversification the evolution of strategy and management thinking

Diversification: The Evolution of Strategy and Management Thinking

MANAGEMENT

PRIORITIES

Quest for Growth

Addressing under-performance of widely-diversified firms

Creating shareholder value

  • Competitive advantage through speed & flexibility

  • Creating opportunities for future growth

  • Emergence of conglomerates

  • Diversification by established companies into related sectors

Emphasis on

“related’ &

“concentric” diversification

  • Refocusing on core businesses

  • Divesting diversified businesses

  • Joint ventures and alliances

  • Creating growth options

  • through focused

  • diversification

DEVELOPMENTS

IN CORPORATE

STRATEGY

STRATEGY TOOLS

& CONCEPTS

  • Financial analysis

  • Diffusion of M form structures

  • Creation of corporate planning depts.

  • Economies of scope & synergy”

  • Portfolio planning models

  • Capital asset pricing model

  • Maximization of shareholder wealth

  • Core competences

  • Dominant logic

  • Dynamic capabilities

  • Transaction cost analysis

  • Real options

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2006


Motives for diversification

Motives for Diversification

GROWTH --The desire to escape stagnant or declining industries a powerful motives for diversification (e.g. tobacco,

oil, newspapers).

--But, growth satisfies managers not shareholders.

--Growth strategies (esp. by acquisition), tend to

destroy shareholder value

RISK --Diversification reduces variance of profit flows

SPREADING --But, doesn’t create value forshareholders—they can

hold diversified portfolios of securities.

--Capital Asset Pricing Model shows that diversification

lowers unsystematic risk not systematic risk.

PROFIT --For diversification to create shareholder value, then

bringing together of different businesses under

common ownership & must somehow increase

their profitability.


Diversification and shareholder value porter s three essential tests

Diversification and Shareholder Value: Porter’s Three Essential Tests

If diversification is to create shareholder value, it must meet three tests:

1. The Attractiveness Test: diversification must be directed towards attractive industries (or have the potential to become attractive).

2. The Cost of Entry Test: the cost of entry must not capitalize all future profits.

3. The Better-Off Test: either the new unit must gain competitive advantage from its link with the company, or vice-versa. (i.e. some form of “synergy”must be present)

Additional source of value from diversification: Option value


Competitive advantage from diversification

Competitive Advantage from Diversification

  • Predatory pricing/tie-in salesEvidence

  • Reciprocal buyingof these

  • Mutual forbearanceis sparse

MARKET

POWER

  • Sharing tangible resources (research labs, distribution systems) across multiple businesses

  • Sharing intangible resources (brands, technology) across multiple businesses

  • Transferring functional capabilities (marketing, product development) across businesses

  • Applying general management capabilities to multiple businesses

ECONOMIES

OF

SCOPE

  • Economies of scope not a sufficient basis for diversification ----must be supported by transaction costs

  • Diversification firm can avoid transaction costs by operating internal capital and labor markets

  • Key advantage of diversified firm over external markets--- superior access to information

ECONOMIES

FROM

INTERNALIZING

TRANSACTIONS


Relatedness in diversification

Relatedness inDiversification

Economies of scope in diversification derive from two types of relatedness:

  • Operational Relatedness-- synergies from sharing resources across businesses (common distribution facilities, brands, joint R&D)

  • Strategic Relatedness-- synergies at the corporate level deriving from the ability to apply common management capabilities to different businesses.

    Problem of operational relatedness:- the benefits in terms of economies of scope may be dwarfed by the administrative costs involved in their exploitation.


Diversification performance

Diversification & Performance

  • No consistent systematic relationships between performance and degree of diversification

    • Perhaps an Inverse U shape – why?

  • Stock market returns to acquiring firms negative on average

  • Related vs. unrelated diversification

    • Conglomerate discount & “ stick to the knitting”

    • But GE, LVMH, Virgin Group are anomalies


Managing the multibusiness corporation

Managing the Multibusiness Corporation

OUTLINE

  • Structure of the Multidivisional Company

    • Theory of the M-form

    • The divisionalized firm in practice

  • The Role of Corporate Management

  • Managing the Corporate Portfolio

    • Portfolio planning techniques

    • Value-creation through corporate restructuring

  • Managing Individual Businesses

  • Managing Internal Linkages

  • Recent Trends


  • The multidivisional structure theory of the m form

    The Multidivisional Structure: Theory of the M-Form

    Efficiency advantages of the multidivisional firm:

    • Recognizes bounded rationality—top management has limited decision-making capacity

    • Divides decision-making according to frequency:

      —high-frequency operating decisions at divisional level

      —low-frequency strategic decisions at corporate level

    • Reduces costs of communication and coordination: business level decisions confined to divisional level (reduces decision making at the top)

    • Global, rather than local optimization:- functional organizations encourage functional goals. M-form structure encourages focus on profitability.

    • Efficient allocation of resources through internal capital and labor markets

    • Resolves agency problem-- corporate management an interface between shareholders and business-level managers.


    The divisionalized firm in practice

    The Divisionalized Firm in Practice

    • Constraints upon decentralization.

      • Difficult to achieve clear division of decision making between corporate and divisional levels.

      • On-going dialogue and conflict between corporate and divisional managers over both strategic and operational issues.

    • Standardization of divisional management

      • Despite potential for divisions to develop distinctive strategies and structures—corporate systems may impose uniformity.

    • Managing divisional inter-relationships

      • Requires more complex structures, e.g. matrix structures where functional and/or geographical structure is imposed on top of a product/market structure.

      • Added complexity undermines the efficiency advantages of the M-form


    The functions of corporate management

    The Functions of Corporate Management

    —Decisions over diversification, acquisition,

    divestment

    —Resource allocation between businesses.

    Managing the

    Corporate

    Portfolio

    • —Business strategy formulation

    • —Monitoring and controlling business

    • performance

    Managing the

    individual

    businesses

    —Sharing and transferring resources and

    capabilities

    Managing

    linkages

    between

    businesses


    The development of strategic planning techniques general electric in the 1970 s

    The Development of Strategic Planning Techniques: General Electric in the 1970’s

    Late 1960’s: GE encounters problems of direction, coordination, control, and profitability

    Corporate planning responses:

    • Portfolio Planning Models—matrix-based frameworks for evaluating business unit performance, formulating business strategies, and allocating resources

    • Strategic Business Units—GE reorganized around SBUs (business comprising a strategically-distinct group of closely-related products

    • PIMS—a database which quantifies the impact of strategy on performance. Used to appraise SBU performance and guide business strategy formulation


    Portfolio planning models their uses in strategy formulation

    Portfolio Planning Models: Their Uses in Strategy Formulation

    • Allocating resources-- the analysis indicates both the investment requirements of different businesses and their likely returns

    • Formulating business-unit strategy-- the analysis yields simple strategy recommendations (e.g..: “build”, “hold”, or “harvest”)

    • Setting performance targets-- the analysis indicates likely performance outcomes in terms of cash flow and ROI

    • Portfolios balance-- the analysis can assist in corporate goals such as a balanced cash flow and balance of growing and declining businesses.


    Portfolio planning models the bcg growth share matrix

    Portfolio Planning Models: The BCG Growth-Share Matrix

    Earnings: low, unstable, growing

    Cash flow: negative

    Strategy: analyze to determine whether business can be grown into a star, or will degenerate into a dog

    Earnings: high stable, growing

    Cash flow: neutral

    Strategy: invest for growth

    ?

    HIGH

    Annual real rate of market growth (%)

    Earnings: high stable

    Cash flow: high stable

    Strategy: milk

    Earnings: low, unstable

    Cash flow: neutral or negative

    Strategy: divest

    LOW

    LOW

    HIGH

    Relative market share


    Diversification strategy

    Applying the BCG Matrix to Time Warner Inc.

    Cable TV

    Networks

    Film

    production

    Cable

    -8 -404 8 12

    Magazine

    Publishing

    Annual real rate of market growth (%)

    Bakery division

    Music

    AOL

    Relative market share

    Position in 2003Position in 2000. (Area of circle proportional to $ sales)


    Portfolio planning models the ge mckinsey matrix

    Portfolio Planning Models: The GE/ McKinsey Matrix

    High

    B U I L D

    Industry Attractiveness

    H O L D

    Medium

    H A R V E S T

    Low

    Low

    Medium

    High

    Business Unit Position

    Industry Attractiveness Criteria Business Unit Position

    - Market size - Market share (domestic,

    - Market growth global, and relative)

    - Industry profitability - Competitive position

    - Inflation recovery - Relative profitability

    - Overseas sales ratio


    Do portfolio planning models help or hinder corporate strategy formulation

    Do Portfolio Planning Models Help or Hinder Corporate Strategy Formulation?

    • ADVANTAGES

    • Simplicity: Can be quickly

    • prepaired

    • Big picture: Permits one page

    • representation of the corporate

    • portfolio & the strategic

    • positioning of each business

    • Analytically versatile:

    • Applicable to businesses,

    • products, countries,

    • distribution channels.

    • Can be augmented: A useful

    • point of departure for more

    • sophisticated analysis

    • DISADVANTAGES

    • Simplicity: Oversimplifies the

    • factors determining industry

    • attractiveness and competitive

    • advantage

    • Ambiguous:The positioning

    • of a business depends

    • critically upon how a market is

    • defined

    • Ignores synergy: the analysis

    • takes no account of any

    • interdependencies between

    • businesses


    Corporate restructuring to create value the mckinsey pentagon

    Corporate Restructuring to Create Value: The McKinsey Pentagon

    Current

    market

    value

    1

    Current perceptions

    gap

    Maximum raider

    opportunity

    Optimal

    restructured

    value

    Company

    value as is

    2

    5

    RESTRUCTURING

    FRAMEWORK

    Strategic and

    operating

    opportunities

    Total company

    opportunities

    3

    4

    Potential value

    with internal

    improvements

    Potential value

    with external

    improvements

    Disposal/acquisition

    opportunities


    Exxon s strategic planning process

    Exxon’s Strategic Planning Process

    Economic Review

    Energy Review

    Discuss- -ion with contact director

    Approval by Mgmt. Committee

    Business Plans

    Stewardship Review

    Stewardship Basis

    Financial Forecast

    Corporate Plan

    Investment Reappraisals

    Annual Budget


    Corporate control over the business es

    Corporate Control over the Businesses

    2 basic approaches

    Input

    control

    Output (or performance)

    control

    Monitoring & approving

    business level decisions

    Setting & monitoring

    the achievement of

    performance targets

    Primarily through strategic

    planning system & capital

    expenditure approval

    system

    Primarily through performance

    management system,

    includingoperating budgets

    and HR appraisals


    Goold campbell s corporate management styles financial and strategic control

    Goold & Campbell’s Corporate Management Styles: Financial and Strategic Control

    High

    Centralized

    Strategic

    planning

    CORPORATEINFLUENCE

    Strategic

    control

    Financial

    control

    Holding

    company

    Low

    Flexible strategic

    Tight strategic

    Tight financial

    CONTROL INFLUENCE


    Corporate management application s of pims analysis

    Corporate Management Applications of PIMS Analysis

    • Setting performance targets

      • —feeding business unit strategic and industry data into the PIMS

      • regression model gives performance norms for the business

      • (PAR ROI).

    • Formulating business unit strategy

      • — PIMS model can simulate theimpact of changing strategic

      • variables.

    • Allocating investment funds between businesses

      • — PIMS Strategic Attractiveness Scan comparison different

      • business units’strategic attractiveness and their cash flow

      • characteristics


    Managing linkages between businesses

    Managing Linkages between Businesses

    KEY ISSUE—How does the corporate center add value to the business?

    • BASIS OF BUSINESS LINKAGES—Sharing of resources and capabilities.

    • SHARING OCCURS AT TWO LEVELS:

    • Corporate level—common corporate services

    • Business level—sharing resources, transferring capabilities

    • PORTER’S ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS LINKAGES AND CORPORATE

    • STRATEGY TYPES

    • Portfolio management— Parent creates value by operating an internal

    • capital market

    • Restructuring—Parent create value by acquiring and restructuring

    • Inefficiently-managed businesses

    • Transferring skills—Parent createsvalue by transferringcapabilities

    • between businesses

    • Sharing activities—Parent createsvalue by sharing resources between

    • businesses

    ROLE OF DOMINANT LOGIC—importance of corporate managers’ perception of linkages


    What corporate management activities are implied by porter s concepts of corporate strategy

    What Corporate Management Activities are Implied by Porter’s “Concepts of Corporate Strategy”

    • (1) Portfolio Management

      • Using superior information and analysis to acquire attractive companies at

      • favorable prices (e.g. Berkshire Hathaway).

      • Minimizing cost of capital (e.g. GE)

      • Create efficientt internal system for capital allocation (e.g. Exxon-Mobil)

      • Efficient monitoring of business unit performance (e.g BP-Amoco).

    (2) Restructuring: Intervening to cut costs and divest under performing assets (e.g.

    Hanson during 1980s & early 1990s)

    (3) Transferring skills:

    —Transferring best practices (e.g. Hewlett-Packard)

    —Transferring innovations (e.g. Sharp)

    —Transferring key personnel between businesses(e.g. Sony)

    (4) Sharing activities:

    —Common corporate services (e.g. 3M)

    —Sharing operational resources and functions (e.g. sales and distribution,

    manufacturing facilities).


    Rethinking the management of multibusiness corporations lessons from g eneral e lectric

    Rethinking the Management of Multibusiness Corporations: Lessons from General Electric

    Jack Welch’s transformation of GE’s structure and management systems:

    • Delayering --- from 9 or 10 layers of hierarchy to 4 or 5

    • Decentralizing decisions.

    • Reformulating strategic planning—from formal, document-intensive analysis to direct face-to-face discussion of key issues.

    • Redefining the role of HQ—from checker, inquisitor, and authority to facilitator, helper, and supporter.

    • Coordinating role of HQ— corporate HQ to lead in creating the “boundaryless corporation” where innovations and ideas flow and where horizontal coordination occurs to respond to new opportunities.

    • HQ as change agent— corporate HQ driving force for continual organizational change (e.g. “workout”, “six-sigma”).


    Rethinking the management of multibusiness corporations lessons from abb

    Rethinking the Management of Multibusiness Corporations: Lessons from ABB

    Key features of ABB’s corporate management system:

    • Matrix organization—both product and country / regional coordination; flexible reporting requirements

    • Radical decentralization—ABB’s corporate HQ was tiny (<100 staff). Decision making authority lay with individual national subsidiaries (mostly small or medium-sized businesses).

    • Bottom-up management. Each business had its own balance sheet and could retain 1/3 of net income.

    • Informal collaboration and integration.

    Yet, for all of ABB’s apparent success at reconciling coordination with

    decentralization, by 2002-03, deteriorating profitability and complexity of

    matrix structure caused ABB to dismantle its matrix and adopt simpler line of business structure


    Diversification strategy

    Rethinking the Management of Multibusiness Corporations: Bartlett & Ghoshal’s Analysis of Key Management Processes

    RENEWAL PROCESS

    Managing the tension between short-term ambition

    Managing operational interdependencies and personal networks

    Creating and pursuing opportunities

    Shaping and embedding corporate purpose

    Developing and nurturing organizational values

    Establishing

    strategic mission &

    performance standards

    Creating and maintaining organizational trust

    Linking skills, knowledge, and resources

    Reviewing, developing, and supporting initiatives

    INTEGRATION PROCESS

    ENTREPRENEURIAL PROCESS

    Front-line Management Middle Management Top Management


    Case virgin

    Case: Virgin

    • What common resources and capabilities link the separate Virgin companies?

    • Which businesses, if any, should Branson consider divesting?

    • What criteria should Branson apply in deciding what new diversification to pursue?

    • What is the Virgin business model?

    • What changes in the financial structure, organizational structure, and management systems of the Virgin groupwould you recommend?


  • Login