Overview of the Idaho
Download
1 / 58

Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 161 Views
  • Uploaded on

Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System. Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability [email protected] The Star Rating System. Evaluate school performance using multiple measures, including achievement, growth, and postsecondary and career readiness

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System' - phiala


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Overview of the Idaho

Five Star Rating System

Dr. TJ Bliss

Director of Assessment and Accountability

[email protected]


The star rating system
The Star Rating System

  • Evaluate school performance using multiple measures, including achievement, growth, and postsecondary and career readiness

  • Appropriately and equitably account for all Idaho students

  • Reward schools and create incentives for improvement

  • Provide easily understood information to education stakeholders about school performance





Achievement


(p. 74, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver) the ISAT and ISAT-alt

Achievement


Translating achievement points into star points
Translating Achievement Points into Star Points the ISAT and ISAT-alt

Achievement


5 the ISAT and ISAT-alt0

40

100

4

90

100

30

40

3

70

45

35

100

80

4

11

11/15 = 73%

73% * 20 = 15

73% * 25 = 18

(p. 75, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Achievement


Growth to achievement
Growth to Achievement the ISAT and ISAT-alt


Student growth percentile sgp
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) the ISAT and ISAT-alt

  • Normative measure of individual student growth

  • Whole number from 1-99

  • Test scores over two or more grade levels

  • Answers the question:

    • “What is the percentile rank of a student compared to all Idaho students with similar score histories?”

      • Example:

        • A student earning an SGP of 70 grew as much or more than 70 percent of his or her academic peers.

Growth to Achievement


Student growth percentile sgp1
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) the ISAT and ISAT-alt

What is the percentile rank of a student’s score

compared to students with similar score histories?

Percentile Rank = 42

This student’s grade 4 score is at or above 42 percent of his academic peers.

Percentile Rank = 75

This student’s grade 4 score is at or above 75 percent of his academic peers.

Current Grade 4

Current Grade 4

Initial Grade 3


Adequate growth percentile agp
Adequate Growth Percentile (AGP) the ISAT and ISAT-alt

  • A criterion-referenced measure relative to proficiency

  • Whole number from 1-99

  • Measures how far away a student is from proficiency

  • Answers the question: “How much growth would a student have to make to reach proficiency in 3 years or by 10th grade?”

Growth to Achievement


Median sgp msgp
Median SGP (MSGP) the ISAT and ISAT-alt

  • Describes the average/typical growth status of students in a single school

  • Calculated by rank-ordering SGPs for all students in a school and selecting the middle number (median)

    NOT a statewide median!

Growth to Achievement


(p. 77, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver) the ISAT and ISAT-alt

Growth to Achievement


Translating growth to achievement points into star points
Translating Growth to Achievement Points into the ISAT and ISAT-altStar Points

Growth to Achievement


100 the ISAT and ISAT-alt

68

5

32

Yes

3

100

44

24

Yes

100

73

No

4

68

12

12/15 = 80%

80% * 30 = 24

80% * 50 = 40

(p. 78, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Growth to Achievement


Growth to achievement at risk subgroups
Growth to Achievement the ISAT and ISAT-altAt-Risk Subgroups


At risk subgroup
At-Risk Subgroup the ISAT and ISAT-alt

  • Free and Reduced Lunch Eligible Students (FRL)

  • Students with Disabilities

  • Limited English Proficient Students (LEP)

  • Minority Students

    • American Indian/Alaskan Native

    • Asian

    • Black/African American

    • Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

    • Hispanic/Latino

    • Two or more races

Growth to Achievement At-Risk Subgroups


(p. 77, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver) the ISAT and ISAT-alt

Growth to Achievement At-Risk Subgroups


Translating growth to achievement at risk subgroup points into star points
Translating Growth to Achievement At-Risk Subgroup Points into Star Points

Growth to Achievement At-Risk Subgroups


5 into

68

32

Yes

5

100

5

3

100

Yes

44

24

5

4

No

100

73

68

12

15

15

12/15 = 80%

80% * 25= 20

80% * 20 = 16

(p. 80, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Growth to Achievement At-Risk Subgroups



Postsecondary and career readiness1
Postsecondary and Career Readiness into

  • Graduation Rate (prior year)

  • College Entrance Exams

    - SAT, ACT, COMPASS

  • Advanced Opportunities

    • AP, IB, Dual Credit, Tech Prep

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


Graduation rate
Graduation Rate into

(p. 81, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


Graduation rate1
Graduation Rate into

Prior year graduation rate is used (e.g. 11-12 grad rate is used for 12-13 Star Rating).

(p. 82, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


College entrance exams
College Entrance Exams into

  • Includes only juniors in a school who take the SAT, ACT, or COMPASS exams during 11th grade

  • Does not include all juniors on the class roster

  • Points based on students meeting established benchmarks

  • ACCUPLACER Diagnostic Test cannot be used for Star Rating because no benchmarks scores exist

  • ACCUPLACER Placement Test cannot be used for Star Rating because this test is only given in 12th grade

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


College entrance exams benchmarks
College Entrance Exams into Benchmarks

(p. 83, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


College entrance exams1
College Entrance Exams into

(p. 84, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


College entrance exams2
College Entrance Exams into

(p. 84, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


College entrance exams3
College Entrance Exams into

(p. 84, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


Advanced opportunities
Advanced Opportunities into

  • Includes percent of all junior and seniors who complete an advanced opportunities course:

    • Advanced Placement

    • International Baccalaureate

    • Dual Credit

    • Tech Prep

  • Also includes percent of students who pass an advanced opportunities course with a “C” or better grade

    • Percent is based on # of students who pass divided by # of students who complete

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


Advanced opportunities1
Advanced Opportunities into

Only juniors and seniors who complete are included here

All juniors and seniors on roster are included here

(p. 85, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


Translating postsecondary and career readiness points into star points
Translating Postsecondary and Career Readiness Points into into Star Points

Postsecondary and Career Readiness


8 into

80%

2

40%

3

60%

13

13/20 = 65%

65% * 30 = 20

(pp. 85-86, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

Postsecondary and Career Readiness



  • All schools must have at least a 95% ISAT participation rate for all students, including all subgroups.

  • Participation < 95% will result in a 1-star reduction, with a maximum 3 Star Rating possible.

  • Participation is determined by dividing the number of students assessed on the spring ISAT by the number of students reported on the class roster file in ISEE.

Participation


Star rating determination
Star Rating Determination for all students, including all subgroups.


(p. 87, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver) for all students, including all subgroups.

Star Rating Determination


(p. 87, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver) for all students, including all subgroups.

Star Rating Determination


(p. 88, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver) for all students, including all subgroups.

Star Rating Determination


Annual measurable objectives amos and at risk achievement gaps aags
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) and for all students, including all subgroups.At-Risk Achievement Gaps (AAGs)


AMOs for all students, including all subgroups.

  • Operate separately from Star Rating System

  • Annual determinations regarding whether schools have met specific targets for each ESEA accountability subgroup

  • Produced for each core content area (Reading, Math, Language Arts)

AMOs and AAGs


Current amo targets
Current AMO Targets for all students, including all subgroups.

(p. 123, Idaho ESEA Flexibility Waiver)

AMOs and AAGs


Proposed amo targets reading
Proposed AMO Targets: Reading for all students, including all subgroups.


Proposed amo targets math
Proposed AMO Targets: Math for all students, including all subgroups.


Proposed amo targets language arts
Proposed AMO Targets: Language Arts for all students, including all subgroups.


AAGs for all students, including all subgroups.

  • Operate separately from Star Rating System

  • Annual determinations regarding whether or not schools have achievement gaps greater than those set during the baseline period in which Focus Schools were established

  • Gap comparison is between non-at-risk subgroup and at-risk subgroup

  • Produced for each core content area (Reading, Math, Language Arts)

AMOs and AAGs


Aag targets
AAG Targets for all students, including all subgroups.

  • Defined as threshold or point difference between the non-at-risk students and the at-risk students in terms of the percentage of students at or above proficient in each content area.

(p. 16, 2013 Star Rating Business Rules)

AMOs and AAGs


Rewards and sanctions
Rewards and Sanctions for all students, including all subgroups.


Differentiated system of recognition accountability and support
Differentiated System of Recognition, Accountability, and Support

  • Differentiated levels of rewards, sanctions, and consequences

  • The WISE Tool Improvement Planning process

  • Diagnostic reviews to assess local capacity

  • A Statewide System of Support that utilizes tiered levels of intensity and state intervention.

Rewards and Sanctions



Reward schools
Reward Schools Support

  • Highest Performing Schools

  • High-Progress Schools

    See pages 132-134 of the ESEA Flexibility Waiver

Rewards and Sanctions


Improvement schools
Improvement Schools Support

  • Focus Schools

  • Priority Schools

    See pages 135-175 of the ESEA Flexibility Waiver

Rewards and Sanctions


Amo and aag improvement
AMO and AAG Improvement Support

  • Each 4 or 5 Star school identified as missing AMO or AAG targets 2-years in a row will be considered to be in “AMO/AAG Continuous Improvement.”

  • Such schools will be required to submit to their districts SMART goals addressing the AMO/AAG deficiencies.

  • Districts will be responsible for ensuring and reporting that each school has submitted sufficient SMART goals.

  • Schools will have access to the WISE Tool for submitting SMART goals to their districts.

  • The SDE will not be approving AMO/AAG SMART goals,but districts may need to provide evidence that goals have been received, reviewed, and supported.

Rewards and Sanctions


View your results
View Your Results Support

https://apps.sde.idaho.gov/Accountability/ReportCard


Access your data
Access Your Data Support

https://apps.sde.idaho.gov/Accountability/Appeals


Questions
Questions? Support

Star Rating Determinations

Dr. TJ Bliss

Director of Assessment and Accountability

[email protected]

Rewards and Sanctions

Greg Alexander

Director of Statewide System of Support

[email protected]


ad