1 / 20

SMALL (and simple) Is USEFUL

SMALL (and simple) Is USEFUL. Simple Models as aids for Higher Level Military Decision Making 21 st ISMOR Moshe Sharvit Thinkware Ltd. hgrtmr@zahav.net.il. Examples of H.L. Issues. Force structure Relating operational means to strategic ends Force sizing Acquisition of major w/s.

phewitt
Download Presentation

SMALL (and simple) Is USEFUL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SMALL (and simple) Is USEFUL Simple Models as aids for Higher Level Military Decision Making 21st ISMOR Moshe Sharvit Thinkware Ltd. hgrtmr@zahav.net.il

  2. Examples of H.L. Issues • Force structure • Relating operational means to strategic ends • Force sizing • Acquisition of major w/s

  3. Main Points • “Interacting with DM” and “The use and abuse of simple models”– not mutually exclusive • Simple models have some important uses as aids to H.L. decision making

  4. The “socio-analytic” situation Analytic community Analyst DM Problem Model

  5. The “socio-analytic” situation Analytic community Analyst DM Problem Model “Organizational culture”

  6. Problem Characteristics • Squishy; ill defined problems • Undefined goals – no clear “objective function” • Complex relation of operational means to strategic goals • Uncertainty –cannot be reduced to a probability distribution • Multi-criteria • “Soft” criteria - unquantifiable • Paucity of reliable data

  7. Implications • What is it all about? • Optimization is rarely sought • Robustness is of the essence • Value judgments

  8. Perceptions of Analyst’s Expertise Analyst Technical Expert* Systems analysis expert *e.g.: munitions effectiveness, search theory, logistics etc.

  9. Analyst & DM: Domains of Expertise • Technical expert vis-à-vis the DM – Little or no overlap - analyst possesses “professional authority” • Sys. Analyst vis-à-vis the DM - Significant overlap. Interaction: not authority but Persuasion in this case Analyst’s parlance, models and other tools of trade should be communicable to non-members of the analytic community

  10. The Analyst’s Role & the Complexity of Models • Opaque vs. Transparent models • Complex, mathematically sophisticated models tend to place the Analyst in the “Surrogate DM” position • Disregard of soft, unquantifiable variables leads to the “bean-counter” trap

  11. “Utilization Success”(Goeller)Mainuses of Simple Models • Problem formulation • Generation of alternatives • Estimation of consequences • Rejection of alternatives • Selection of preferred alternative • Promotion of preferred alternative • Implementation

  12. In Conclusion “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler”. Albert Einstein

  13. The End

  14. Problem formulation: The Role of the Model(after E. Quade) • Provide a depiction of reality • Provide a perspective of reality At the higher operational and strategic levels it is difficult to achieve a reasonably accurate depiction of reality using quantitative models

  15. Model need not encompass the whole issue; elucidate an aspect of the problem • Model needs to be relevant to a variety of particular situations • “validation by consent”

  16. Problem formulation: Uses of simple models • Gain understanding through: • identification of system elements • identification of interplays and interdependencies (synergy, etc.) • Outline basic dilemmas • An aid to the establishment of criteria • Outline basic alternatives

  17. Example - Countering SSM’s: Interception & counter-attack Impacts c.a. only No response Int. only c.a. + int. Time

  18. Some issues raised • Mix proportions • Temporal differences: early period vs. later period • # of interceptors • Operational (systemic) effect of each weapon system mop

  19. Rejection of alternativesExample: replacement of old weapon systems • Limited budgets but plenty of w/s acquisition opportunities. • To pass the test the candidate w/s needs to have a decisive overall advantage over the incumbent w/s otherwise • There is probably a better opportunity • A simple model may provide a bound on cost/effectiveness ratios

  20. An example: Selection of Fighter A/C • Cost (LCC): f1 /f2 =approx. 2 • Effectiveness: f1 selected if either: • f1 has unique, extremely important, capabilities; or • f1 clearly outperforms f2 in almost every major category by at least 2:1.

More Related