1 / 7

AF1.4 L1-2 Provisional nature of scientific evidence

AF1.4 L1-2 Provisional nature of scientific evidence. AF1.4 L 2-3 Provisional nature of scientific evidence. AF1.4 L3-4 Provisional nature of scientific evidence. Recognise when scientific evidence is for or against an argument

peony
Download Presentation

AF1.4 L1-2 Provisional nature of scientific evidence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AF1.4 L1-2 Provisional nature of scientific evidence

  2. AF1.4 L2-3 Provisional nature of scientific evidence

  3. AF1.4 L3-4 Provisional nature of scientific evidence Recognise when scientific evidence is for or against an argument Recognise when scientific evidence supports an idea or not

  4. AF1.4 L4-5 Provisional nature of scientific evidence Give examples of instances where science cannot answer all our questions

  5. AF1.4 L5-6 Provisional nature of scientific evidence Describe evidence which supports or disproves accepted or developing scientific ideas

  6. AF1.4 L6-7 Provisional nature of scientific evidence Explain how evidence has supported accepted scientific ideas Explain how evidence can enable further questions to be asked Explain how emerging evidence is helping to explain scientific theories

  7. AF1.4 L7-8 Provisional nature of scientific evidence Analyse how a new theory came about over time by investigating the available evidence Explain why scientific ideas are provisional Recognise that different interpretations of evidence can lead to controversy

More Related