1 / 12

Welcome

Welcome. Sheng Peng Controls & Computing Department Manager. FRIB Project at MSU Project of $614.5M ($520M DOE, $94.5M MSU). Dec. 2008: DOE selects MSU to establish FRIB June 2009: DOE and MSU sign corresponding cooperative agreement

penn
Download Presentation

Welcome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Welcome Sheng PengControls & Computing Department Manager

  2. FRIB Project at MSUProject of $614.5M ($520M DOE, $94.5M MSU) • Dec. 2008: DOE selects MSU to establish FRIB • June 2009: DOE and MSU sign corresponding cooperative agreement • Sept. 2010: CD-1 granted; conceptual design complete & preferred alternatives decided • June 2012: CD2/3A pursued; performance baseline & start of conventional facility construction Growth from more than 400 employees today at NSCL, MSUMore than 700 registered user at NSCL user group and at FRIB user organization

  3. Facility Layout S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

  4. FRIB Driver Accelerator Layout • Delivers FRIB accelerator as part of a DOE-SC national user facility with high reliability & availability • Accelerate ion species up to 238U with energies of no less than 200 MeV/u • Provide beam powerup to 400kW • Satisfy beam-on-target requirements • Energy upgrade by filling vacant slots with 12 SRF cryomodules • Maintain ISOL option • Upgradable to multiuser simultaneous operation of light/heavy ions with addition of a light-ion injector

  5. ReA3 as FRIB Technology “Prototype” Installed or close to final installation (EBIT) • ReA3 is a MSU contribution to FRIB • ReA3 shares similar technologies as the FRIB driver LINAC • ReA3 provides data for the FRIB engineering, commissioning and installation planning, beam physics, and development of the control system Pilot source Q/A MHB 0.041 modules RT RFQ 0.085 module FY12

  6. Key Requirements • FRIB key facts to controls • CW machine with 10.0625MHz main RF clock • Single-shot/pulse mode for commissioning • Beam power up to 400kW CW • Machine protection is critical for damage prevention and efficient commissioning • Multi-types of particles with different charge states • Physics model • Most of the low level devices are network-attached devices or PLC with Ethernet • Large scale of network • Fix TPC $614.5M • Controls budget is tight as well. Has to deliver on time/within budget • Pre-commissioning • Most of the control system has to be ready to support installation and commissioning started mid-2015 • CD-4 milestone • Whole control system has to be ready to support FRIB operation by 2018 S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

  7. Technical Scope • Global systems • Global timing system • Machine protection system • Network and computers • High level applications • Standards • Control room applications • Physics applications • Low level controls • Personnel protection system • Diagnostics • Conventional facility integration S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

  8. Scale • It is a large scale distributed control system • ~200m * 200m physical distribution • ~150 Computers/EPICS Input/Output Controllers (IOC) • ~100 Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) • Thousands of network attached intelligent devices • RF controller • Power supply controller • Vacuum gauge/pump controller • Programmable logic controller • ~ 3000 network ports • >500 timing drop points • ~2000 MPS fast protection inputs • ~646 racks and more than 100 with controls devices S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

  9. Technical Status for Software Standard • Naming convention is establish • FRIB, NSCL beamline and ReA3 all follow the same naming convention • RDB will force the name convention • MySQL is selected as FRIB standard RDBMS • XAL is selected as FRIB physics online modeling platform • CSS is selected as FRIB standard framework of control room applications • GUI standard is established • SOA –Service Oriented Architectureis preferred • SCM standard is established • RT, Mercurial, Jenkins, Mantis S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

  10. Technical Status for High Level Applications • High Level Applications deliverables are identified and reviewed • Database schema (IRMIS-like) is under development • CSS development and collaboration • E-log plugin • Scan user interface • E-log is online and has been using in ReA3 • E-traveler prototype will soon be given to user S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

  11. Technical Status for Physics Applications • Physics applications deliverables are identified and reviewed • XAL is adopted and built • The hardware representation and online model for electrostatic quads are added • XAL configuration files for FRIB Linac and ReA3 are generated • Benchmarking is going on against off line modeling tool LB Source to Diagnostics Box2 FRIB Segment1 to Stripper Energy Gain S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

  12. Goal of this workshop • Present the current status of database related design and development(architecture, schema, lattice/model, service and applications) from both FRIB and BNL • Evaluate if the architecture meets both labs’ requirements • Review the current schema (IRMIS-like) design for FRIB to establish a good starting point for whole HLA/Physics Apps • Identify the common interest between FRIB and NSLS II • Try to establish a plan for further collaboration S. Peng, November 2011 ASAC Review - 16

More Related