1 / 20

Topology and Parametric Optimisation of a Lattice Composite Fuselage Structure

Topology and Parametric Optimisation of a Lattice Composite Fuselage Structure. Dianzi Liu, V assili V. Toropov , Osvaldo M. Querin University of Leeds. Content. Introduction Topology Optimisation Parametric Optimisation Conclusion.

penn
Download Presentation

Topology and Parametric Optimisation of a Lattice Composite Fuselage Structure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Topology and Parametric Optimisation of a Lattice Composite Fuselage Structure DianziLiu, VassiliV. Toropov, Osvaldo M. Querin • University of Leeds

  2. Content • Introduction • Topology Optimisation • Parametric Optimisation • Conclusion

  3. Topology OptimisationMethod • Topology Optimisation is a computational means of determining the physical domain for a structure subject to applied loads and constraints. • The method used in this research is the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP). • It works by minimising the compliance (maximising global stiffness) of the structure by solving the following optimization problem: • for a single load case, • or by minimising the weighted compliance for multiple (N) load cases:

  4. Topology OptimisationLoad Cases • Topology Optimisation: minimizing the compliance of the structure for 3 load cases • Load cases consist of distributed loads over the length and loads at the barrel end(shear forces, bending moments and torque) • Question: what are the appropriate weight coefficient values?

  5. Topology OptimisationMethod for weight allocation The following strategy was used: • Do topology optimization separately for each load case, obtain the corresponding compliance values • Allocate the weights to the individual compliance components (that correspond to the individual load cases) in the same proportion • The logic behind this is as follows: if for a particular load case topology optimization produced a relatively high compliance value, then this load case is a critical one and hence it should be taken with a higher weight in the total weighted compliance optimization problem

  6. Topology OptimisationModel and Results • Topology Optimisation Results for 3 load cases Transverse bending Bending Torsion

  7. Topology OptimisationResults Iso view: optimizationofthebarrelforweightedcompliance

  8. Topology OptimisationPresence of window openings • Optimization of the barrel without windows (Top) and with windows (Bottom) • Two backbones on top and bottom of the barrel • Nearly +-45° stiffening on the side panel • Result: beam structure for the barrel • Note: SIMP approach does not consider buckling

  9. Development of the Design Concept by DLR • Reflection on the layout of the “ideal” structure from the topology optimization it in the aircraft design context • Consideration of airworthiness and manufacturing requirements • Fuselage design concept developed by DLR • High potential for weight savings achievable due to new material for stiffeners and non-rectangular skin bays • Due to large number of parameters in the obtained concept a multi-variable optimisation should be performed

  10. Multi-parametric Optimisation • Method: the multi-parameter global approximation-based approach used to solve the optimization problem • Problem: optimize an anisogrid composite fuselage barrel with respect to weight and stability, strength, and stiffness using 7 geometric design variables, one of which is an integer variable. • Procedure: • develop a set of numerical experiments (FEA runs) where each corresponds to a different combinations of the design variables. The concept of a uniform Latin hypercube Design of Experiments (DOE) with 101 experiments (points in the variable space) was used. • FE analysis of these 101 fuselage geometries was performed • global approximations built as explicit expressions of the design variables using Genetic Programming (GP) • parametric optimisation of the fuselage barrel by a Genetic Algorithm (GA) • verification of the optimal solution by FE simulation 10

  11. Design of Experiments • In order to generate the sampling points for approximationbuilding, a uniform DOE (optimal Latin hypercube design) is proposed. • The main principles in this approach are as follows: • The number of levels of factors (same for each factor) is equal to the number of experiments and for each level there is only one experiment; • The points of experiments are distributed as uniformly as possible in the domain of factors, which are achieved by minimizing the equation: • where Lpqis the distance between the points p and q (p≠q) in the system. Example: A 100-point DOE generated by an optimal Latin hypercube technique 11

  12. Genetic Programming • Genetic Programming (GP) is a symbolic regression technique, it produces an analytical expression that provides the best fit of the approximation into the data from the FE runs. • Example: a approximation for the shear strain obtained from the 101 FE responses: where Z1, Z2, …, Z7 are the design variables. Indications of the quality of fit of the obtained expression into the data: 12

  13. FEM Modeling and Simulation Automated Multiparametric Global Barrel FEA Tool: Modeling, Analysis, and Result Summary User Defined Parameters: -Geometry -Loads -Materials -Mesh seed Session file: List of Models to be Analyzed MSC Patran MSC Nastran PCL Modeling and Analysis PCL Function Post-processing PCL Function Results: Buckling Beam Strains Displacement Skin Strains Results of all analyzed models are summarized in a separate file 13

  14. Optimisation of the Fuselage Barrel • Composite skin and stiffeners An upward gust load case at low altitude and cruise speed Undisturbed anisogrid fuselage barrel Early design stage z Qz y x 14

  15. Variables and Constraints Wf =20mm Radius 2m h Variables: Hf tf Circumf. Helix Rib Pitch, dep. on n 2φ Wf =20mm Frame Pitch, d FuselageGeometry • Constraints: • Strength: strains in the skin and in the stiffeners • Stiffness: bending and torsional stiffness • Stability: buckling • Normalization • Normalized mass against largest mass • Margin of safety ≥0 • Strain • Stiffness • Buckling Wh=20mm th Barrel Cross Section Hh dh=8mm dh=8mm Helix Ribs Circumferential Frames 15

  16. Results: Summary of parametric optimisation • (±45,0,45,0,-45,90)s, 14 plies, total thickness = 1.75 mm Strength Contraint Stability, Strength, and Stiffness Contraints Optimum III geometry with realistic ply layup: 502 mm 628 mm Helical ribs: tall and slender Frames: thin and small 18.94 ° 209 mm 84 mm 9.55 ° Optimum II Optimum III and Comp. Design 16

  17. Results: Interpretation of the skin as a laminate, 14 plies 17

  18. Results: Interpretation of the skin as a laminate, 15 plies 18

  19. Conclusion • Multi-parameter global metamodel-based optimization was used for: • Optimization of a composite anisogrid fuselage barrel with respect to weight, stability, strength, stiffness using 7 design variables, 1 being an integer • 101-point uniform design of numerical experiments, i.e. 101 designs analysed • Automated Multiparametric Global Barrel FEA Tool generates responses • global approximations built using Genetic Programming (GP) • parametric optimization on global approximations • optimal solution verified via FE • Overall, the use of the global metamodel-based approach has allowed to solve this optimization problem with reasonable accuracy as well as provided information on the structural behavior of the anisogrid design of a composite fuselage. • There is a good correspondence of the obtained results with the analytical estimates of DLR, e.g. the angle of the optimised triangular grid cell is 9.55° whereas the DLR value is 12° 19

  20. Thank You for your Attention 20

More Related