Coercion and compulsion in community mental health care l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 24

Coercion and Compulsion in community mental health care PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Coercion and Compulsion in community mental health care Andrew Molodynski Department of Social Psychiatry, Oxford Background Substantial shifts in place of care delivery over 50 or so years, which are ongoing Services’ ability to provide intensive input in the community

Download Presentation

Coercion and Compulsion in community mental health care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Coercion and compulsion in community mental health care l.jpg

Coercion and Compulsion in community mental health care

Andrew Molodynski

Department of Social Psychiatry, Oxford


Background l.jpg

Background

  • Substantial shifts in place of care delivery over 50 or so years, which are ongoing

  • Services’ ability to provide intensive input in the community

  • Community Compulsion introduced formally last year


Questions re ctos l.jpg

Questions re CTOs

  • Are they a substantial change from previous powers in practice?

  • Can they help to reduce symptoms and improve functioning?

  • Are they palatable (and to whom) or will they damage fragile therapeutic relationships?

  • Will we use them?


Wider context l.jpg

Wider Context

  • It’s not that we don’t use coercion

  • However, we don’t always acknowledge this

  • Increasing attention is being paid to the issue from both ethical/ moral and empirical perspectives

  • It is likely that decent understanding will come from a combination of the two


Treatment pressures l.jpg

Treatment pressures

  • Persuasion-an ‘appeal to reason’

  • Leverage-use of interpersonal pressure

  • Inducement-offers of help contingent upon remaining well

  • Threat-withdrawal of support/help if uncooperative

  • Compulsion-use of legislation

    Szmukler+ Appelbaum (2008). Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care: Journal of Mental health 17(3): 233-44


Monahan et al 2005 l.jpg

Monahan et al 2005

  • 1000 US patients( in 5 places)

  • Housing leverage 23-40%

  • Criminal sanction leverage 15-40%

  • Financial leverage 7-19%

  • Outpatient commitment 12-20%

  • Childcare leverage reported but not measured systematically

  • Monahan J et al (2005). Use of leverage to improve adherence to psychiatric treatment in the community; Psychiatric Services: 56(1) p37-44


Monahan l.jpg

Monahan…

  • Leverage ubiquitous in standard mental health care

  • Actual nature depended on available methods, but overall rates similar

  • Correlations: substance misuse

    younger

    high BPRS

    low GAF

    long term/intensive treatment


Our study ultima l.jpg

Our study (ULTIMA)

  • Examination of leverage in 400 patients:

  • 100 Assertive Outreach

  • 100 CMHT psychosis

  • 100 CMHT non psychosis

  • 100 substance misuse

    Quantitative and qualitative

    Carer/family perspectives + staff attitudes


Slide9 l.jpg

  • Partial recreation of US work

  • Attempt to reach wider group

  • Comparison across services in one geographical area to try to detect differences

  • Measurement in a system without outpatient commitment


Comparison l.jpg

Comparison


Summary l.jpg

Summary

  • Leverage is commonly reported by UK community mental health care patients (much more commonly than we might think!)

  • The highest rates appear to be in substance misuse services(63%)

  • Housing and criminal justice are the most common in our preliminary findings(24% and 15%)

  • Childcare leverage is routinely reported by patients (11%) and requires addressing in its own right as could be especially toxic.


Conclusions patients views l.jpg

Conclusions - patients’ views

Not as negative as expected

48% agreed / strongly agreed that child custody sanctions helped

“It always comes back to the children”

“if you’ve got a mental health problem then boy are you in trouble especially if the other person wants to play that card with the courts..”

Child custody and housing seen as most likely to help keep patients well


Back to ctos evidence l.jpg

Back to CTOs- evidence

  • Cohort studies and naturalistic data suggest an effect in terms of service use and clinical outcome

  • Randomised trials and before and after analyses have shown no statistically significant results

  • “ More research urgently needed” as current evidence suggests a number needed to treat of 85 to prevent 1 admission (Cochrane review 2007)!!


Slide15 l.jpg

But……

  • Swartz et al 1999

  • Large US RCT of 250 patients

  • Found no overall significant effects

  • A subgroup of people kept on orders for up to a year and receiving weekly (at least) support had reduced readmission rates (57%fewer readmissions and 20 days less overall and 73% and 28 days if psychotic)

  • Concluded that they may work, but only with high levels of support ( for US)


North carolina secondary analyses l.jpg

North Carolina secondary analyses

Swartz et al, 1999

>180 days of outpatient commitment green, <180 days blue

≥ 3 clinical contacts per month

Results

57% reduction in mean admissions, occupancy down 20 days (all)

73% reduction in mean admissions, occupancy down 28 days (schizophrenia)


Ny state assisted outpatient programme l.jpg

NY State Assisted Outpatient Programme

  • Significant reduction in days in hospital with community compulsion: 10v11v18 days in 6 months

  • Interviewed 277 patients re perceived coercion and found no difference between the 2 groups, concluding:

    “Current AOT participants did not experience more adverse subjective conditions around mental health treatment than comparable individuals who weren’t under AOT”

    Swartz, Swanson, Steadman, Robbins, and Monahan 2009


The oxford community treatment order evaluation trial octet l.jpg

The Oxford Community Treatment Order Evaluation Trial (OCTET)

  • Randomised Controlled Trial

  • N=300 (117 so far)

  • Either CTO or ‘non CTO’

  • 1 year follow up by us

  • Variety of outcomes measured: hospital and other care use, self harm, offending, drug use, symptom levels, engagement, economic analyses etc etc


Participant characteristics l.jpg

Participant characteristics

Psychotic illness

Detained under S3 or S37 and CTO being considered

18-65

Have capacity (our researchers are trained to assess this)


Main issues for clinical teams l.jpg

Main issues for clinical teams

  • Willingness to maintain Equipoise ( basically accepting that we ‘simply do not know’) and not cross patients over

  • A few minutes time to briefly introduce idea to patient and then call us

  • A few minutes time every few months to catch up on progress

  • We do all the chasing, note reading, and interviewing so the burden is genuinely minimal

  • Clinical care is unaffected


Main benefits l.jpg

Main benefits

  • Helping us!

  • This will almost certainly be the only chance to get good quality evidence to inform what has been a long and heated debate for professionals and probably the defining issue of our era

  • Financial rewards to trusts for recruitment are substantial and can/should support local services


Overall conclusions l.jpg

Overall conclusions

  • Few relationships are entirely free

    • Our patients understand this

  • Ubiquity of leverage indicates the need to incorporate it into current training

  • More sophistication required in understanding the therapeutic relationship

  • Further research may indicate outcomes


Slide23 l.jpg

  • It is imperative that we try to gather as much evidence as we can while practice in regard to community compulsion develops before it is too late

  • Continued attention needs to be paid to non legislative coercion as this can be as keenly felt as compulsion and perhaps have as profound effects upon relationships and outcomes


Please do get in touch l.jpg

Please do get in touch!

  • [email protected]

  • [email protected]

  • [email protected]

  • 01865 613171


  • Login