Advertisement
1 / 29

Theoretical Framework PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 286 Views
  • Uploaded on 09-10-2011
  • Presentation posted in: General

Theoretical Framework. Research basis. Theoretical Framework. What is the central concept(s) integral to the study? (look within and outside LIS) Connecting the study to theory: basic research. Good Theory. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Download Presentation

Theoretical Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Theoretical framework l.jpg

Theoretical Framework

Research basis


Theoretical framework2 l.jpg

Theoretical Framework

  • What is the central concept(s) integral to the study? (look within and outside LIS)

  • Connecting the study to theory: basic research


Good theory l.jpg

Good Theory

  • Advances knowledge in a discipline, guides, research, enlightens the discipline, helps the discipline mature and gain validation

  • Enables us to rise above the seemingly random confusion of everyday life to see patterns and to understand principles on which to base purposeful, productive action

  • Provides an important context


Theory vs practice l.jpg

Theory vs. Practice

  • We cannot do without theory. It will always defeat practice in the end for a quite simple reason. Practice is static. It does well what it knows. It has, however, no principle for dealing with what it doesn’t know … Practice is not well adapted for rapid adjustments to a changing environment. Theory is light footed, it can adapt itself to changed circumstances, think out fresh


Slide5 l.jpg

  • Out fresh combinations and possibilities, peer into the future. Theory provides a clear framework, administrative practice reduces to a series of meaningless acts, without purpose of direction.

    • Source: Charles H. Granger, Harvard Business Review 42 (May-June 1964), p. 64.


Theory l.jpg

Theory

  • Provides patterns for the interpretation of data

  • Links one study to another

  • Supplies frameworks within which concepts and variables acquire special significance

  • Allows us to interpret the larger meaning of our findings for ourselves and others

    • Source: The elements of social scientific thinking, p. 40


Examples l.jpg

Information needs

information-seeking behavior

Effectiveness

Teams/small groups

Success

Reference Transactions

Standards

RUSA, IL, Accreditation

Expectations

service quality

Satisfaction

Value

See Measuring your library’s value, Donald S. Elliott et al (ALA, 2007)

Examples


Theoretical framework8 l.jpg

Theoretical Framework

Dalbello, M. (2009). Cultural dimensions of digital library development: Part II the cultural innovations of five European national libraries. Library Quarterly, 79(1).

Culture = National Culture + Organizational Culture + Professional Culture + Heterogeneous Tool Kit Culture


Logical structure l.jpg

Logical Structure

Who, what, when, where, how…


Logical structure10 l.jpg

Logical Structure

  • Explicitly addresses all the possible variables within a study

  • Identifies all of the important components

  • Is a menu of choices--no decisions are represented

  • The decisions = objectives


Logical structure components l.jpg

Logical Structure (Components)

  • Addresses the questions of

  • What (problem statement)

  • Who

  • Where

  • When

  • How (methods)


Logical structure12 l.jpg

Logical Structure

  • Not always directly addressed within the published study, but must be addressed by the research during the planning stages.

  • Often possible to represent the logical structure through a diagram or model


Slide13 l.jpg

What

  • Identifies the problem under study

  • May help to brainstorm for contributing factors, causes and effects

  • May have to operationalize terms= i.e. success, efficiency, effectiveness, etc.

  • Some methods:

    • Flow Chart

    • Five Why’s

    • Fishbone Diagram


Fishbone diagram dr kaoru ishikawa l.jpg

Fishbone DiagramDr. Kaoru Ishikawa

Materials

People

Policies

Problem Statement

Process

Technology


Slide15 l.jpg

Who

  • The group under study

  • Identifies the population

  • Identifies the sample within the population

  • May have to justify choices


Slide16 l.jpg

When

  • The time frame of the study

    • Data collection

    • Literature review

    • Correcting for lapses

  • Sets deadlines

  • Creates context


Where l.jpg

Where

  • Identify the environment

  • Sets parameters


Slide18 l.jpg

How

  • Methodologies

  • How will data be collected

  • What is appropriate?


User use study l.jpg

User/Use Study

  • Use

  • Students

  • Simmons College

  • When

  • How


Slide20 l.jpg

Use/Nonuse Study

Where: one to many places

How

When: 1-many times

Library

Use NonUse

Students

Add Variables


E book use l.jpg

E-book Use

Where

When

How

User (Search) Behavior

Undergraduates

variables

variables


Objectives l.jpg

Objectives

Indicate what was selected from the “menu” or logical structure


Components of objectives l.jpg

To ____verb

Object

Components of Objectives


Slide24 l.jpg

  • Basic: to conceptualize

  • Applied: to test

  • Action: to describe


Objectives25 l.jpg

To “describe”

To “relate:” “compare” or “contrast” (relating applies to basic, applied, and action research)

Objectives

identify

define

distinguish

determine

Depict

etc.


Objectives26 l.jpg

Objectives

  • To identify the attributes (requirements, responsibilities, qualifications, and salaries/benefits) of music librarians

  • To determine the extent to which their responsibilities relate solely to music librarianship

  • To compare the attributes listed most frequently in job advertisements with those attributes leading to the actual hiring of individual

  • To compare the list of attributes identified in job advertisements by: geographical area, highest degree offered by the institution, institutional control (private vs. public)


Evaluation questions l.jpg

How much?

How many?

How economical?

How prompt?

How accurate?

How responsive?

How well?

How valuable?

How reliable?

How courteous?

How satisfied?

---------------------------

Accountability and Effectiveness = How well?

Evaluation Questions


Slide28 l.jpg

Others, as institution itself

Customers

Library


Slide29 l.jpg

Others, as institution itself

Customers

Library

Examples: How much? Howmany? How well?

How satisfied?