RFID in the Library Context: Integration, Interoperability, and Business Environment

1. RFID in the Library Context: Integration, Interoperability, and Business Environment Marshall Breeding Director for Innovative Technology and Research Vanderbilt University Library Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guides http://www.librarytechnology.org/ http://twitter.com/mbreeding 77th IFLA General Conference and Assembly  17 Aug 2011

2. Summary • Many aspects of technology supporting the automation of libraries are changing rapidly. Service-oriented architecture, Web-based computing, increased integration of social networking concepts, as well as cloud computing such as software-as-a-service characterize this emerging landscape. Products and services making use of RFID technology have to exist in an automation ecosystem increasingly reshaped by these technologies. Breeding will present a view of how RFID and related technologies fit into this evolving environment, some of the challenges involved such as the need for more modern protocols for interoperability, and some of the opportunities enabled for new efficiencies and innovations. He will also review some of the changes in the global RFID business landscape and comment on its implications for libraries that depend on their products and services.

3. Library Technology Guides www.librarytechnology.org

4. Library Technology Guides • Includes lib-web-cats directory of libraries • Tracks library automation products used by libraries: LMS, Discovery, Link resolvers, etc. • Recently added section on RFID and related products • Interest in collecting data on how these products have been implemented globally

5. Lib-web-cats TechnologyProfile

6. Koha Libraries Worldwide

7. Lib-web-cats extended for RFID Products

8. Lib-web-cats tech profile

9. LJ Automation Marketplace Annual Industry report published in Library Journal: • 2010: The New Frontier • 2009: Investing in the Future • 2008: Opportunity out of turmoil • 2007: An industry redefined • 2006: Reshuffling the deck • 2005: Gradual evolution • 2004: Migration down, innovation up • 2003: The competition heats up • 2002: Capturing the migrating customer

10. The New Frontier… • new phase of competition following a period of research and development that aimed to provide alternatives to libraries, both in back-end automation and end user discovery. A variety of new solutions have emerged, often representing quite different conceptual models. In a continued trend, librarians seek solutions that immediately improve the experiences of their users, especially via discovery products.

11. Phase of realignment in LMS platforms • Strong need to realign library automation with current library realities • Legacy library systems reinforce workflows no longer in step with library priorities. • Need systems that allow libraries to allocate personnel in proper proportion to collection • Separate automation platforms for print and electronic have not proven successful

12. Key Context: Technologies in transition • XML / Web services / Service-oriented Architecture • Local computing shifting to cloud platforms • SaaS / private cloud / public cloud • Beyond Web 2.0: • Integration of social computing into core infrastructure • Full spectrum of devices • full-scale / net book / tablet / mobile

13. Revised library automation priorities • Fundamental assumption: Print + Digital + Social • Print-focusedmodels not adequate for modern libraries • Libraries currently moving toward surrounding core ILS with additional modules to handle electronic content, social engagement, resource sharing, and self-service • New discovery layer interfaces replacing or supplementing ILS OPACS • Working toward a new model of library automation • Monolithic legacy architectures replaced by fabric of SOA applications • Comprehensive Resource Management “It's Time to Break the Mold of the Original ILS” Computers in Libraries Nov/Dec 2007

14. Working toward more Open Systems • Achieving openness has risen as the key driver behind library technology strategies • Open source • Open API’s • Demand for Interoperability • Libraries need to do more with their data • Ability to improve customer experience

15. The Shrinking LMS • The Library Management System no longer stands as the single library automation product that provides comprehensive support for all aspects of library operations. • Many libraries putting much less emphasis on LMS • Manages workflows related to physical materials • Investments in electronic content increasing • Management of e-content handled outside of the ILS

16. Policies $$$ Funds BIB Vendor Holding / Items CircTransact User Legacy LMS Model Public Interfaces: Staff Interfaces: Interfaces Circulation Cataloging Acquisitions Serials OnlineCatalog BusinessLogic DataStores

17. Academic and Research libraries especially struggle with how to deal with managing increasing proportions of licensed electronic content Public Libraries seeking technologies that facilitate engagement with their users: social, interactive, dynamic LMS geared toward print materials New generation of products emerging to address new and emerging library realities Breaking out of the mold

18. Standard Protocols for access to item and patron data SIP NCIP Standard Protocols for access to bibliographic data OAI-PMH ILS-DI (Integrated Library System – Discovery Interface) Standard Protocols for access to other data and functionality API’s specific to automation platform Generalized set of API’s Interoperability Protocols relevant to RFID

19. SIP: System Interchange Protocol • Initially created by 3M, used widely throughout industry for self-service and other tasks needing access to patron and item data and status in library automation systems. • 3M: “Permission is hereby granted to utilize this protocol in hardware and software products but no permission is granted to create derivative works or otherwise modify the protocol” (from ver 2.0 document) • Version 1: 1993 • Version 2: 2006 • Version 3: Draft currently under review

20. NISO Circulation Interchange Protocol • Official Standard designed to operate in the same space as SIP • Z39.83 • Part 1 approved October 2002; Part 2 Approved Nov 2008 • Not widely adopted for self-service • More widely used in resource sharing: interlibrary loan and direct consortial borrowing • Open source NCIP Toolkit developed and released by the eXtensible Catalog project • http://code.google.com/p/xcncip2toolkit/

21. Automation products cannot exist in isolated silos APIs provide a set of tools used by programmers to: Extend Functionality Connect external systems Extract or synchronize data Proprietary API’s common in LMS space Moving toward open API’s and Web Services Application Programming Interfaces

22. Extensibility Interoperability Allows the LMS to connect with other automation components Create a matrix of interconnected systems rather than isolated silos with redundant data and functionality LMS maturity means similar levels of functionality LMS products increasingly differentiated by extent and quality of APIs and interoperability support Benefits of APIs to Libraries

23. Policies $$$ Funds BIB Vendor Holding / Items CircTransact User Legacy ILS Model / API ` Public Interfaces: Staff Interfaces: Interfaces Application Programming Interfaces Circulation Cataloging Acquisitions Serials OnlineCatalog BusinessLogic DataStores

24. $$$ Funds Policies BIB Vendor Holding / Items CircTransact User Legacy ILS Model / protocol Public Interfaces: Staff Interfaces: InterlibraryLoan System Application Programming Interfaces Protocols: SIP2 NCIPZ39.50OAI-PMH Circulation Cataloging Acquisitions Serials OnlineCatalog Self-Check

25. $$$ Funds Policies BIB Vendor Holding / Items CircTransact User Legacy ILS Model / External API Public Interfaces: Staff Interfaces: ExternalSystems & Services Application Programming Interfaces / Web Services Circulation Cataloging Acquisitions Serials OnlineCatalog Flexible Interoperability Protocols: SIP2 NCIPZ39.50OAI-PMH

26. LMS provides strategic core of automation Less involved with end-user contact Discovery for Web-based collection discovery and user services Self-service stations for loans and returns Smart-card and payment systems LMS as Middleware

27. Library Services Platform model Discovery Service Search: Self-Check /Automated Return Library Management System ` Digital Coll Search Engine Consolidated index ProQuest API Layer StockManagement EBSCO … Enterprise ResourcePlanning Smart Cad / Payment systems JSTOR LearningManagement AuthenticationService Other Resources

28. RFID Business Environment

29. Major RFID Companies • 2CQR (UK) • 3M Library Systems • (also supports Checkpoint) • Bibliotheca / Intellident / Bibliotheca ITG • Book-Tech (Taiwan) • Convergent Software (RFID support software, Validation) • D-Tech (United Kingdom) • EnvisionWare (diverse product line including RFID) • Libramation (Canada) • Lib~Chip RFID system • Lyngsoe Systems (Sorting systems RFID/Barcode) • mKSorting Systms (RFID / sorting, self-check, etc) • PV Supa (Finland, Scandinavia) • ShenzenSeaeverInteligent Technology (China – RFID systems) • SwisslogTelelift GmbH (book transportation systems) • Tech Logic (Owned by TLC) • VTLS – Fastrack VTLS division

30. Consolidation • Transition from a fragmented industry of many small players into one where dominated by large global companies • Many companies continue to prosper that operate within a region or country

31. Bibliotheca – Intellident – ITG • Three former competitors joint to form new global company • Integrated Technology Group – United States • Spun off of Vernon Library Supplies • Intellident • Based in the United Kingdom • Ident SAS (French subsidiary) • Bibliotheca RFID Systems • Based in Switzerland

32. New Global Company • Operates regionally under existing brands • Bibliotheca ITG / Intellident / Bibliotheca • Global company: Library Solutions BV • Majority ownership: One Equity Partners • Shai Robkin

33. Diversification • Companies involved in RFID tend to offer diversified products, often to different vertical markets • Diverse technologies: RFID, Electromagnetic, software, hardware, manufacturing • Different dependencies on suppliers of RFID chips, etc.

34. 3M Library Systems • Largest player in RFID and self-service • Electromagnetic + RFIC products • Major launch into the e-book arena • 3M Cloud Library • Intends to compete with Overdrive • E-book content – licensed through major publishers • Integration layer – leveraging SIP and other mechanisms developed in support of self-check • E-book reader – developed for institutional lending • In-library kiosk for discovery and download

35. Intellectual Property Issues • Patent dispute between 3M and EnvisionWare • 3M filed patent infringement suit against EnvisionWare June 23, 2009 • United States Patents involved in the suite include: 6,486,780, 6,232,870, and 6,857,568 • USPTO ruled6,486,780 patent awarded to 3M dealing as invalid • USPTO review of 6,857,568 still in process • Announcement of confidential private settlement on August 12, 2011

36. RFID Technology Issues

37. Privacy Issues • How much information to encode on tags • Identifier only? • Additional functionality available with more content • Essential to avoid matching materials information with user • User data can be read from non-library materials • No public search of identifiers stored in tag

38. RFID Data Encoding Standards • ISO Standards published in March 2011 • ISO 28560-1:2011 • ISO 28560-2:2011 • ISO 28560-3:2011 • NISO: Proposed that US libraries adopt Section 1 and 2 and develop a national profile

39. Can RFID deliver value beyond self-check and AMH? Need enhanced interoperability models Leverage existing standards and API’s in the same way that the ILS-DI protocols provided needed support to connect LMS and Discovery products Provide comprehensive automation model that helps libraries improve service and increase value to their communities RFID & LMS

40. Industry maturing with larger and more stable companies Increased development of Standards Helpful to the extend adopted Risks of investing in RFID diminishing RFID currently focused on increased efficiency RFID technologies increasingly positioned to support more innovative services General Observations

41. Questions and discussion