Climate and Energy at a Crossroads Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus : Breakthrough Institute. Kakushin is Japanese for “radical innovation and renewal”. 20 Years of Carbon-Focused Policies Have Failed Copenhagen failure only the latest Cap and trade in trouble. Again.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Climate and Energy at a CrossroadsMichael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus: Breakthrough Institute
Kakushinis Japanese for “radical innovation and renewal”
The United Nations will not oversee global carbon market, technological revolution, or steady declines in emissions.
Policy shift underway from making dirty energy expensive to making clean energy cheap.
$40/ton CO2 price in Europe did not stop plans to build 50 more coal plants (without CCS)
EU firms bought carbon offsets rather than invest in new technology.
US cap and trade would allow 140% offsetting, price of $10 – 20/ton (source: EPA/CBO)
(P.S.: We did not get computers through a cap and trade on typewriters)
Clean tech deployment from supply-side policies.
German feed-in tariff
Chinese feed-in + PTC
US PTC & ITC
Danish wind deployment
Nuclear procurement in France, China, US, Denmark — the list goes on and on…
We are picking technology winners — and that’s a good thing.
DoD procurement of microchips in late ‘50s drove price from $1,000/chip to $20/chip in under 10 yrs.
Asia’s Clean-Tech Tigers
Asia Governments to Invest 3 Times More Than U.S.
Asia will gain “first mover” advantage: economies of scale, learning-by-doing, and innovation
Asian government investments are direct and coordinated. U.S. and Europe indirect and uncoordinated.
U.S. developed solar, nuclear, wind, and electric car technologies — then lost them to Japan, Denmark, France and others because of its failure to invest.
Storm Clouds on Clean Tech Horizon
Rapid growth will be difficult to maintain as renewables start to achieve larger market share. E.g., 25% annual growth much easier to maintain at 1% of generation than 10% of generation
Subsidy-driven deployment increasingly harder to maintain politically as market share grows: 20% wind = $20 billion annual PTC
Rising cost pressure on wind/solar with greater deployment
Marginal sites, higher transmission costs, higher load management/storage costs
Clean Tech Funding Cliff Ahead
Incremental Niche Market Strategy Can’t Deal with Climate Energy Challenge
Population to rise to 9 billion, and global energy use will triple by 2050 — must get emissions from energy to zero.
1.5 billion people will still have no electricity — for them, conventional energy is too expensive, not too cheap
Stabilizing carbon emissions at
450 ppm means completely decarbonizing global energy supply.
“If you gave me one wish for the next 50 years it would be energy at half the cost with zero emissions.”
— Bill Gates 2.24.10
How to Make Clean Energy Cheap
Increase public investment in all stages of innovation — private sector investment will follow.
Four Key Technological Breakthroughs:
Mass-manufacture of small self-contained nuclear plants.
Deployment for radical cost-reductions, not insignificant emissions reductions.
“Prescient.” — Time