An Electroencephalogram Study of Induction and Recovery from Propofol Anesthesia July 7, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MGH DACC Clinical Practices Committee
Download
1 / 20

  • 64 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

MGH DACC Clinical Practices Committee. An Electroencephalogram Study of Induction and Recovery from Propofol Anesthesia July 7, 2005 PI:Brown CoPI:Walsh, Purdon, Mullaly, Kwo, Harrell, Williams, Dray, Bonmassar, Angelone, Hamalainen, Barlow, Matten. Issues for DACC.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

An Electroencephalogram Study of Induction and Recovery from Propofol Anesthesia July 7, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


An electroencephalogram study of induction and recovery from propofol anesthesia july 7 2005

MGH DACC Clinical Practices Committee

An Electroencephalogram Study of Induction and Recovery from Propofol Anesthesia

July 7, 2005

PI:Brown

CoPI:Walsh, Purdon, Mullaly, Kwo, Harrell, Williams, Dray, Bonmassar, Angelone, Hamalainen, Barlow, Matten


Issues for dacc

Issues for DACC

  • Permission to conduct EEG/propofol study

    • Identical to DACC-approved EEG/fMRI/propofol study, but with EEG only, no fMRI

  • Permission to implement protocol at the GCRC Bioimaging Core facility (CNY 149) as an offsite location


Overview

Overview

  • Protocol History

  • Research Background

  • Walk Through Protocol

  • Human Research Protection/ Safety


Protocol history

Protocol History

  • Similar to BIS/propofol protocol by Rosow/Kearse (1998)

  • Similar to EEG/fMRI/Anesthesia by Brown

    • IRB approved (1999-P-010748 MGH)

    • Reviewed by MGH DACC CPC

    • MGH Mallinckrodt GCRC (GAC)


Eeg propofol vs eeg fmri propofol

EEG/propofol vs. EEG/fMRI/propofol

  • EEG only, no fMRI under anesthesia

    • Study conducted in standard clinical area

  • Airway management with bag-mask

  • ASA I Study Subjects ages 18-36

  • Conducted in GCRC Bioimaging core

    • Meets requirements for off-site anesthesia

  • EEG source localization

    • Requires structural MRI in separate session


Research background

Clinical Obs., EEG, BIS

Induction of Anesthesia

Site Specific Changes in Neural Activity

EEG Source Localization

 GABA-A,  NMDA (?)

Research Background


Eeg source localization

Somatosensory-Motor Exp’t: Early somatosensory peak, followed by motor response

EEG Source Localization

  • Combine structural/conductivity information from anatomic MRI to “localize” auditory, somatosensory, and cognitive function

  • Faster time scale than fMRI, but spatial resolution lower w/ limited subcortical visibility


Our objective

Our Objective

To correlate simultaneous measurements of

  • electroencephalogram (EEG)

  • plasma levels of propofol

  • well-defined behavioral markers

  • changes in source localization

    during induction of and recovery from

    general anesthesia.


Walk through protocol

Walk Through Protocol

  • Study subject pre-anesthesia clinical assessment

    • Prior to study

    • GCRC White 13

  • Induction and Recovery from Propofol

  • Study subject follow-up

  • Separate anatomic MRI scan (30 minutes)


Study protocol clinical assessment

Study Protocol: Clinical Assessment

  • Subject Recruitment

    • Healthy male and female volunteers

    • Ages 18-36

    • Total 44 subjects recruited

  • ASA physical status I

  • Telephone Questionnaire

  • Pre-study Assessment (2 hours)

    • History and Physical Examination

    • Toxic Screen and Pregnancy Test (female subjects)


Study protocol clinical preparation

Study Protocol: Clinical Preparation

  • Toxic screen and pregnancy test

  • Standard Anesthesia Monitors:

    • ECG, BP cuff, pulse oximeter, capnogram

  • Additional Monitors:

    • EEG, arterial line

  • Airway Maintenance:

    • Bag mask

  • Phenylephrine to maintain BP

  • Additional Drugs:

    • bicitra, ondansetron


Study protocol overview

Study Protocol: Overview

DIAGRAM W/ CONCENTRATION PROFILE


Equipment supplies at cny 149

Equipment/ Supplies at CNY 149

  • ACLS cart

  • Defibrillator

  • Anesthesia Cart

  • Airway equipment

  • Anesthesia Machine

  • O2 and Air (Wall and E-cylinders)

  • Monitors (FiO2, SaO2, EtCo2, ECG, NIBP, P1)

  • Laboratory Testing (urine pregnancy, tox screen, ABG)

  • iSTAT

  • EEG machine and electrodes

  • Routinely maintained by Biomedical Engineering


Acls cart defibrillator

ACLS Cart, Defibrillator

  • PICTUR OF ACLS CART AND DEFIB


Anesthesia cart and anesthesia machine

Anesthesia Cart and Anesthesia Machine

  • PICTURE OF ANESTHESIA CART AND ANESTHESIA MACHINE


O2 supply wall e cylinders

O2 Supply: Wall + E-cylinders

  • PICTURE OF WALL AIR/02 AND E-CYLINDERS


Monitors istat

Monitors + iSTAT


Nursing responsibilities

Nursing Responsibilities

  • Page study Physician

  • Urine toxicity screen

  • Urine pregnancy test

  • ART line setup available

  • ABG sampling + analysis w/ iSTAT

  • Preparation of blood samples for storage (propofol)


Medical staff responsibilities

Medical Staff Responsibilities

  • Clinical Anesthesiologist

    • care of study subject

    • PACU care

  • Study Anesthesiologist

    • organization and execution of study protocol

    • STANPUMP infusion


Preliminary studies

MLAEP, 4.0 ug/ml

MLAEP, 0.0 ug/ml

MLAEP, 2.0 ug/ml

1

1

1

0.5

0.5

0.5

P

P

a

a

0

0

0

N

b

P

N

Amplitude (uV)

a

b

-0.5

-0.5

-0.5

N

N

b

a

N

-1

N

-1

-1

a

a

-1.5

-1.5

-1.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

Post-stimulus latency (msec)

Post-stimulus latency (msec)

Post-stimulus latency (msec)

Power Spectrum, 0.0 ug/ml

Power Spectrum, 2.0 ug/ml

Power Spectrum, 4.0 ug/ml

6000

6000

6000

5000

5000

5000

/Hz)

4000

4000

4000

2

3000

3000

3000

Power (uV

2000

2000

2000

1000

1000

1000

0

0

0

0

10

20

30

40

0

10

20

30

40

0

10

20

30

40

Frequency (Hz)

Frequency (Hz)

Frequency (Hz)

EEG, 2.0 ug/ml

EEG, 0.0 ug/ml

EEG, 4.0 ug/ml

40

40

40

20

20

20

0

0

0

Amplitude (uV)

-20

-20

-20

-40

-40

-40

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

Time (sec)

Time (sec)

Time (sec)

Preliminary Studies

MLAEP

EEG

Power

Spectrum

EEG time series

Propofol:

0.0 ug/ml

2.0 ug/ml

4.0 ug/ml


  • Login