marpol annex vi
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
MARPOL Annex VI

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 16

MARPOL Annex VI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 129 Views
  • Uploaded on

MARPOL Annex VI. TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007. IMO & UNILATERAL LEGISLATION ON LOW SULPHUR MARINE FUELS. ALTERNATIVES on SOx & PM. A. Base Line - No change in SOx regulations B. Global + Regional (SECA) + port (mini SECAs) different S cap values :

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'MARPOL Annex VI' - page


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
marpol annex vi

MARPOL Annex VI

TRIPARTITE

TOKYO

20th SEPTEMBER 2007

alternatives on sox pm
ALTERNATIVES on SOx & PM
  • A. Base Line - No change in SOx regulations
  • B. Global + Regional (SECA) + port (mini SECAs) different S cap values:
    • (possible lower) Global S cap & lower S cap in SECAs
    • USA – [0.1%] S cap up to [200] nm from shore
    • BIMCO proposal – 3% global S cap; 1% 0.5% MDO in SECAs or scrubbers
  • C. GLOBAL S CAP (no SECA):
    • Mandate 1% 0.5% MDO for all ships
    • Global S cap or emissions limit but leave the industry to choose compliance method
experience with seca
EXPERIENCE WITH SECA
  • So far, complinace by LSFO
  • Switch from HFO to LSFO depends on the ship’s bunker storage capacity and lay-out
  • Standard designs (1 settling & 1 service tanks) provide little flexibility
  • Depending on initial S % of the HFO, fuel switch in at least 48 hrs
  • 60 hours from HFO with 4.04% S to LSFO with 1.3% S
switch sequence in basic desings
SWITCH SEQUENCE IN BASIC DESINGS
  • Stop HFO transfer from storage to settling tanks (1 to 3 days prior to entry into SECA)
  • Settling tank empty – start transfer of LSFO to the settling tank
  • Service tanks almost empty of HFO – start feeding LSFO from settling tank (some 6 hours before entry into SECA)
  • Cylinder oil feeding rate adjusted or switch to a lower BN cylinder oil
  • Continuous crew attendance/monitoring
fuel switch over better solutions
FUEL SWITCH OVERBETTER SOLUTIONS
  • Simpler for ships with 2 settling & 2 service tanks (few hours)
  • Complete segregation between HFO & LSFO systems reduces the fuel switch over to matter of minutes and permits automatic control
  • Complete segregation = no risk of incompatibility between HFO & LSFO blends
secas change over areas
SECAs & CHANGE OVER AREAS

Source: http://maps.google.com/

Changeover

Area

MAY

2006

AUGUST 2007

secas change over areas1
SECAs & CHANGE OVER AREAS

Source: http://maps.google.com/

New Changeover Area

slide11

HOW MANY MORE SECAs?

2012?

2012?

???

???

2012?

2012?

IMPACT ON A LARGE NUMBER OF SHIPS

scrubbers
SCRUBBERS

Scrubbers for Pride of Kent

  • - large space required in the ship’s funnel;
  • for a main engine of 20 MW, sea water up to 22,000 t/day need to be processed (45t/hr/MW*)
  • - up to 100 kg/day of hazardous sludge (5kg/day/MW*)

* data supplied by Krystallon

conclusions
CONCLUSIONS
  • Alternative solutions may require new installations and new operations
  • Design standardisation for safe & simpler operation
  • Expected contributions from:
    • Ship operators
    • Ship designers
    • Classification Soceities
  • Future Tripartite cooperation
ad