1 / 49

TGax PHY Ad Hoc Sep 2016 Meeting Agenda

TGax PHY Ad Hoc Sep 2016 Meeting Agenda. Date: 2016-09-12. Authors:. Co-Chairs: Bo Sun (ZTE) Jianhan Liu (Mediatek) Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell). IEEE 802.11 TGax High Efficiency WLAN PHY Ad Hoc. Agenda Items. Call meeting to order

otis
Download Presentation

TGax PHY Ad Hoc Sep 2016 Meeting Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGax PHY Ad Hoc Sep 2016 Meeting Agenda Date: 2016-09-12 Authors: Bo Sun (ZTE)

  2. Co-Chairs: Bo Sun (ZTE) Jianhan Liu (Mediatek) Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell) IEEE 802.11 TGaxHigh Efficiency WLANPHY Ad Hoc Bo Sun (ZTE)

  3. Agenda Items • Call meeting to order • Patent policy, etc. (Call for Potentially Essential Patents) • Review ad hoc rules • Set and approve agenda • Technical Presentations approved by 802.11ax for presentation this week, and related straw polls • CRs will be prioritized. • Any other technical presentations Bo Sun (ZTE)

  4. Meeting Protocol, Attendance, Voting & Document Status Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot Cell Phones to be silent or Off Register your attendance via https://imat.ieee.org while on meeting SSID (e.g. Verilan-secure) Make sure your badges are correct If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, Member’s Area Contact Jon Rosdahl – jrosdahl@ieee.org Slide 4

  5. Patent Policy and Other Guidelines • Following 5 slides

  6. The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation Advise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. Instructions for the WG Chair

  7. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform • All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents orpatent claims • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patentclaim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group • Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1

  8. All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html Patent Related Links If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Slide #2

  9. If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted Call for Potentially Essential Patents Slide #3

  10. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. • --------------------------------------------------------------- • See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4

  11. Straw Polls are only allowed during Ad Hoc group meeting // no motions, anyone can vote A straw poll needs to achieves at least 75% to be converted to a motion at the TG level. Each Presentation is suggested to have 15 minutes including presenting and Q&A. Ad Hoc Groups Operation

  12. TGax PHY Adhoc Schedule in a Glance Bo Sun (ZTE))

  13. PHY Submissions (1/3) • Notes: • Docs in green color have been presented. • Docs in red color have been withdrawn. • Docs in black color have NOT been presented. • Docs presented but need more discussion or deferred

  14. PHY Submissions (2/3) • Notes: • Docs in green color have been presented. • Docs in red color have been withdrawn. • Docs in black color have NOT been presented. • Docs presented but need more discussion or deferred

  15. PHY Submissions (3/3) • Notes: • Docs in green color have been presented. • Docs in red color have been withdrawn. • Docs in black color have NOT been presented. • Docs presented but need more discussion or deferred

  16. Do you agree to adopt the spec text changes as shown in doc 11/16-1134r1? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 1 (#1, 11-16/1133r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  17. Do you agree the resolution to the comments as below in 11-16/1135r2 • CID 1927, 2521, 2522, 2523, 2107, 2108 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 2 (#1, 11-16/1135r2) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  18. Do you agree the resolution to the comments as below in 11-16/1136r3 • CID 286, 2137, 287, 288, 289,1676, 1980, 1982, 1983, 2417, 2418, 2419, 294, 298, 299, 300, 1979, 2370, 901, 1847, 1967, 1968, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1976, 1977, 1978  SP: Passed without objection Note, CID 294 is not addressed Straw-poll 3 (#1, 11-16/1136r3) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  19. Do you agree the resolution to the comments as below in 11-16/1137r3 • CID 294, 873, 1099, 1698, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2019, 2531, 2540, 2541 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 4 (#1, 11-16/1137r3) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  20. Do you agree the resolution to the comments as below in 11-16/1138r4 • CID 2097, 2098, 2099, 2563, 2564, 2726, 2881, 484 SP: Passed without objection Note, CID 2098 has been resolved in 937r7 Straw-poll 5 (#1, 11-16/1138r4) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  21. Do you agree the resolution to the comments as below in 11-16/1148r1 • CID 1022, 2864, 2678, 2016, 2011, 2010, 2001 •  Except CID 226 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 6 (#1, 11-16/1148r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  22. Do you agree to adopt the following SRP values for the corresponding entries in Spatial Reuse fields (in Spatial Reuse 1, Spatial Reuse 2, Spatial Reuse 3, and Spatial Reuse 4) for He Trigger-based PPDU • SRP= TX PWRAP + Acceptable Receiver Interference levelAP • Adjustment range for parameters (referenced to the antenna port) • TX_PWRAP: -10 dBm to 26 dBm • Acceptable Receiver Interference LevelAP: -82dBm to -36 dBm • If SRP is below <-80 dBm, set to Spatial Reuse to 0001, if SRP is above -26 dBm, set Spatial reuse to 1110 • Set Spatial Reuse to 0000 for SR disallowed flag, Value 1111 is reserved • Same table is used for AP and STA. SP: Passed without objection (No Motion) Straw-poll 7 (#1, 11-16/1216r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  23. Do you agree the resolution to the comments as below in 11-16/1148r1 • CID 226 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 8 (#2, 11-16/1148r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  24. Do you agree the resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1149r1? • CID 304, 2035, 2033, 527, 478, 2550, 2157, 2131 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 9 (#1, 11-16/1149r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  25. Do you agree the resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1150r2? • CID 1459, 2100, 2101, 2102, 2104, 2135, 2568, 2569, 2570, 2571, 2573, 1414, 1626 • Except CID 2105 and 336 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 10 (#1, 11-16/1150r2) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  26. Do you agree the resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1160r0? • CID 355 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 11 (#1, 11-16/1160r0) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  27. Do you agree the proposed spec text as in 11-16/1170r1? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 12 (#1, 11-16/1170r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  28. Do you agree the proposed spec text as in 11-16/1171r0? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 13 (#1, 11-16/1171r0) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  29. Do you agree the resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1176r1? • CID 834, 1030, 1604, 1861, 2242, and 2919 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 14 (#1, 11-16/1176r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  30. Do you support adding in 11ax spec draft D0.4 page 227 line 7 the following statement: A STA that applies beamforming (BF) in the UL should take the BF gain into account when calculating the transmit power needed to meet the target RSSI. SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 15 (#1, 11-16/1167r0) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  31. Do you support to add to the 11ax spec draft D0.4 on page 186 line 52 (after “It is mandatory to support transmission of 1x HE-LTF in an UL MU-MIMO PPDU over the full bandwidth, for a STA declaring support for UL MU-MIMO”) the following sentence: When 1xLTF is used for full BW UL MU-MIMO, no pilots (in the LTF field) or frequency domain masking are applied. SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 16 (#2, 11-16/1167r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  32. Do you agree the resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1169r1? • CID 506, 851, 1024, 1628, 1693, 1694, 1696, 2159, 2162, 2163, 2165, 2166 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 17 (#1, 11-16/1169r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  33. Do you agree to change the resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1148r6? • CID 226 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 18 (#1, 11-16/1148r6) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  34. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1150r3? • CID 2105 and 336 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 19 (#1, 11-16/1150r3) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  35. Do you agree the proposed spec text changes as in 11-16/1168r2? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 20 (#1, 11-16/1168r2) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  36. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1259r2? • CID 1778, 1784, 2063, 2064, 2065, 2069, 2071, 2073, 2074, 925, 2561, 2560, 2562, 2076, 2070, 332, 2075, 328, 329, 331, 2160, 2161, 2164, 2067 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 21 (#1, 11-16/1259r2) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  37. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1191r2? • CID 538, 496, 497, 498, 499, 344, 501, 1026, 1115, 2351, 500 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 22 (#1, 11-16/1191r2) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  38. Do you agree the proposed spec text changes as in 11-16/1179r4? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 23 (#1, 11-16/1179r4) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  39. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1192r0? • CID 1450 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 24 (#1, 11-16/1192r0) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  40. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1193r1? • CID 4 and 2740 SP: Passed without objection The addressed CIDs originally belong to MAC adhoc and have been transmitted to PHY adhoc Straw-poll 25 (#1, 11-16/1193r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  41. Do you agree the proposed spec text changes as in 11-16/1194r1? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 26 (#1, 11-16/1194r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  42. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1233r1? • CID 503, 504 and 2750 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 27 (#1, 11-16/1233r1) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  43. Do you agree the proposed spec text changes as in 11-16/1242r1? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 28 (#1, 11-16/1240r0) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  44. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/942r2? • CID 327, 2442 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 29 (#1, 11-16/942r2) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  45. Do you agree to change comment resolution to CID 286 and CID 2137 to as in 11-16/1136r5? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 30 (#1, 11-16/1136r5) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  46. Do you agree to change comment resolution to CID 294 and CID 2531 to as in 11-16/1137r4? SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 31 (#1, 11-16/1137r4) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  47. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1202r4? • CID 1865, 481, 517, 537, 920, 319, 1059, 2559, 2551, 2552, 2553, 2554, 2555, 2556, 2558, 923 • Except 323 2557 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 32 (#1, 11-16/1202r4) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  48. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1202r5? • CID 323 2557 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 33 (#1, 11-16/1202r5) Bo Sun (ZTE)

  49. Do you agree the comment resolution to the comments below as in 11-16/1227r2? • CID 841, 1787, 1945, 1946, 1949, 1950, 1965, 2365, 2366, 2524, 2525, 2526, 2918 SP: Passed without objection Straw-poll 34 (#1, 11-16/1227r2) Bo Sun (ZTE)

More Related