Loading in 5 sec....

CS 8520: Artificial IntelligencePowerPoint Presentation

CS 8520: Artificial Intelligence

- 176 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

CS 8520: Artificial Intelligence

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CS 8520: Artificial Intelligence

Intelligent Agents and Search

Paula Matuszek

Fall, 2005

Slides based on Hwee Tou Ng, aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt, which are in turn based on Russell, aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-pdf.

- Agents and environments
- Rationality
- PEAS (Performance measure, Environment, Actuators, Sensors)
- Environment types
- Agent types

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- An agent is anything that can be viewed as perceiving its environment through sensors and acting upon that environment through actuators
- Human agent: eyes, ears, and other organs for sensors; hands,
- legs, mouth, and other body parts for actuators
- Robotic agent: cameras and infrared range finders for sensors;
- various motors for actuators

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- The agent function maps from percept histories to actions:
[f: P* A]

- The agent program runs on the physical architecture to produce f
- agent = architecture + program

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Percepts: location and contents, e.g., [A,Dirty]
- Actions: Left, Right, Suck, NoOp

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- An agent should strive to "do the right thing", based on what it can perceive and the actions it can perform. The right action is the one that will cause the agent to be most successful
- Performance measure: An objective criterion for success of an agent's behavior
- E.g., performance measure of a vacuum-cleaner agent could be amount of dirt cleaned up, amount of time taken, amount of electricity consumed, amount of noise generated, etc.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Rational Agent: For each possible percept sequence, a rational agent should select an action that is expected to maximize its performance measure, given the evidence provided by the percept sequence and whatever built-in knowledge the agent has.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Rationality is distinct from omniscience (all-knowing with infinite knowledge)
- Agents can perform actions in order to modify future percepts so as to obtain useful information (information gathering, exploration)
- An agent is autonomous if its behavior is determined by its own experience (with ability to learn and adapt)

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Performance measure: How do we assess whether we are doing the right thing?
- Environment,: What is the world we are in?
- Actuators: How do we affect the world we are in?
- Sensors: How do we perceive the world we are in?
- Together these specify the setting for intelligent agent design

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Consider, e.g., the task of designing an automated taxi driver:
- Performance measure: Safe, fast, legal, comfortable trip, maximize profits
- Environment: Roads, other traffic, pedestrians, customers
- Actuators: Steering wheel, accelerator, brake, signal, horn
- Sensors: Cameras, sonar, speedometer, GPS, odometer, engine sensors, keyboard

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Agent: Medical diagnosis system
- Performance measure: Healthy patient, minimize costs, lawsuits
- Environment: Patient, hospital, staff
- Actuators: Screen display (questions, tests, diagnoses, treatments, referrals)
- Sensors: Keyboard (entry of symptoms, findings, patient's answers)

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Agent: Medical diagnosis system
- Performance measure: Healthy patient, minimize costs, lawsuits
- Environment: Patient, hospital, staff
- Actuators: Screen display (questions, tests, diagnoses, treatments, referrals)
- Sensors: Keyboard (entry of symptoms, findings, patient's answers)

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Agent: Part-picking robot
- Performance measure: Percentage of parts in correct bins
- Environment: Conveyor belt with parts, bins
- Actuators: Jointed arm and hand
- Sensors: Camera, joint angle sensors

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Agent: Part-picking robot
- Performance measure: Percentage of parts in correct bins
- Environment: Conveyor belt with parts, bins
- Actuators: Jointed arm and hand
- Sensors: Camera, joint angle sensors

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Agent: Interactive English tutor
- Performance measure: Maximize student's score on test
- Environment: Set of students
- Actuators: Screen display (exercises, suggestions, corrections)
- Sensors: Keyboard

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Agent: Interactive English tutor
- Performance measure: Maximize student's score on test
- Environment: Set of students
- Actuators: Screen display (exercises, suggestions, corrections)
- Sensors: Keyboard

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Fully observable (vs. partially observable): An agent's sensors give it access to the complete state of the environment at each point in time.
- Deterministic (vs. stochastic): The next state of the environment is completely determined by the current state and the action executed by the agent. (If the environment is deterministic except for the actions of other agents, then the environment is strategic)
- Episodic(vs. sequential): The agent's experience is divided into atomic "episodes" (each episode consists of the agent perceiving and then performing a single action), and the choice of action in each episode depends only on the episode itself.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Static(vs. dynamic): The environment is unchanged while an agent is deliberating. (The environment is semidynamic if the environment itself does not change with the passage of time but the agent's performance score does)
- Discrete (vs. continuous): A limited number of distinct, clearly defined percepts and actions.
- Single agent (vs. multiagent): An agent operating by itself in an environment.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Chess with Chess without Taxi

a clocka clockdriving

Fully observable

Deterministic

Episodic

Static

Discrete

Single agent

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Chess with Chess w/out Taxi

a clocka clockdriving

Fully observableYesYesNo

DeterministicStrategicStrategicNo

Episodic NoNoNo

Static SemiYes No

DiscreteYes YesNo

Single agentNoNoNo

- The environment type largely determines the agent design
- The simplest environment is fully observable, deterministic, episodic, static, discrete and single-agent.
- The real world is (of course) partially observable, stochastic, sequential, dynamic, continuous, multi-agent

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- An agent is completely specified by the agent function mapping percept sequences to actions
- One agent function (or a small equivalence class) is rational
- Aim: find a way to implement the rational agent function concisely

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Function TABLE-DRIVEN_AGENT(percept) returns an action

append percept to the end of percepts

action LOOKUP(percepts, table)

return action

- Drawbacks:
- Huge table
- Take a long time to build the table
- No autonomy
- Even with learning, need a long time for table entries

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Four basic types in order of increasing generality:
- Simple reflex agents
- Model-based reflex agents
- Goal-based agents
- Utility-based agents

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

function REFLEX-VACUUM-AGENT ([location, status]) return an action

if status == Dirty then return Suck

else if location == A then return Right

else if location == B then return Left

- Observe the world, choose an action, implement action, done.
- Problems if environment is not fully-observable.
- Depending on performance metric, may be inefficient.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Suppose moving has a cost?
- If a square stays clean once it is clean, then this algorithm will be extremely inefficient.
- A very simple improvement would be
- Record when we have cleaned a square
- Don’t go back once we have cleaned both.

- We have built a very simple model.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- More complex agent with model: a square can get dirty again.
Function REFLEX_VACUUM_AGENT_WITH_STATE ([location, status]) returns an action. last-cleaned-A and last-cleaned-B initially declared = 100.

Increment last-cleaned-A and last-cleaned-B.

if status == Dirty then return Suck

if location == A

then

set last-cleaned-A to 0

if last-cleaned-B > 3 then return right else no-op

else

set last-cleaned-B to 0

if last-cleaned-A > 3 then return left else no-op

- The value we check last-cleaned against could be modified.
- Could track how often we find dirt to compute value

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Maintain an internal model of the state of the environment
- Over time update state using world knowledge
- How the world changes
- How actions affect the world

- Agent can operate more efficiently
- More effective than a simple reflex agent for partially observable environments

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Agent has some information about desirable situations
- Needed when a single action cannot reach desired outcome
- Therefore performance measure needs to take into account "the future".
- Typical model for search and planning.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Possibly more than one goal, or more than one way to reach it
- Some are better, more desirable than others
- There is a utility function which captures this notion of "better".
- Utility function maps a state or sequence of states onto a metric.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- All agents have methods for selection actions.
- Learning agents can modify these methods.
- Performance element: any of the previously described agents
- Learning element: makes changes to actions
- Critic: evaluates actions, gives feedback to learning element
- Problem generator: suggests actions

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Solving problems by searching

Chapter 3

- Problem-solving agents
- Problem formulation
- Example problems

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- On holiday in Romania; currently in Arad.
- Flight leaves tomorrow from Bucharest
- Formulate goal:
- be in Bucharest

- Formulate problem:
- states: various cities
- actions: drive between cities

- Find solution:
- sequence of cities, e.g., Arad, Sibiu, Fagaras, Bucharest

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Deterministic, fully observable single-state problem
- Agent knows exactly which state it will be in; solution is a sequence

- Non-observable sensorless problem (conformant problem)
- Agent may have no idea where it is; solution is a sequence

- Nondeterministic and/or partially observable contingency problem
- percepts provide new information about current state
- often interleave} search, execution

- Unknown state space exploration problem

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Single-state, start in #5. Solution?

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Single-state, start in #5. Solution?[Right, Suck]
- Sensorless, start in {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}e.g., Right goes to {2,4,6,8} Solution?

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Sensorless, start in {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}e.g., Right goes to {2,4,6,8} Solution?[Right,Suck,Left,Suck]
- Contingency
- Nondeterministic: Suck may dirty a clean carpet
- Partially observable: location, dirt at current location.
- Percept: [L, Clean], i.e., start in #5 or #7Solution?

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Sensorless, start in {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}e.g., Right goes to {2,4,6,8} Solution?[Right,Suck,Left,Suck]
- Contingency
- Nondeterministic: Suck may dirty a clean carpet
- Partially observable: location, dirt at current location.
- Percept: [L, Clean], i.e., start in #5 or #7Solution?[Right, if dirt then Suck]

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

A problem is defined by four items:

- initial state e.g., "at Arad"
- actions or successor function S(x) = set of action–state pairs
- e.g., S(Arad) = {<Arad Zerind, Zerind>, … }

- goal test, can be
- explicit, e.g., x = "at Bucharest"
- implicit, e.g., Checkmate(x)

- path cost (additive)
- e.g., sum of distances, number of actions executed, etc.
- c(x,a,y) is the step cost, assumed to be ≥ 0

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Real world is absurdly complex
state space must be abstracted for problem solving

- (Abstract) state = set of real states
- (Abstract) action = complex combination of real actions
- e.g., "Arad Zerind" represents a complex set of possible routes, detours, rest stops, etc.

- For guaranteed realizability, any real state "in Arad“ must get to some real state "in Zerind"
- (Abstract) solution =
- set of real paths that are solutions in the real world

- Each abstract action should be "easier" than the original problem

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- States? Actions? Goal Test? Path Cost?

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- states? integer dirt and robot location
- actions? Left, Right, Suck
- goal test? no dirt at all locations
- path cost? 1 per action

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- states?
- actions?
- goal test?
- path cost?

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- states? locations of tiles
- actions? move blank left, right, up, down
- goal test? = goal state (given)
- path cost? 1 per move
[Note: optimal solution of n-Puzzle family is NP-hard]

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- states?
- actions?
- goal test?
- path cost?

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- states?: real-valued coordinates of robot joint angles parts of the object to be assembled
- actions?: continuous motions of robot joints
- goal test?: complete assembly
- path cost?: time to execute

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- Basic idea:
- offline, simulated exploration of state space by generating successors of already-explored states (a.k.a.~expanding states)

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- A state is a (representation of) a physical configuration
- A node is a data structure constituting part of a search tree includes state, parent node, action, path cost g(x), depth
- The Expand function creates new nodes, filling in the various fields and using the SuccessorFn of the problem to create the corresponding states.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- A search strategy is defined by picking the order of node expansion. (e.g., breadth-first, depth-first)
- Strategies are evaluated along the following dimensions:
- completeness: does it always find a solution if one exists?
- time complexity: number of nodes generated
- space complexity: maximum number of nodes in memory
- optimality: does it always find a least-cost solution?

- Time and space complexity are measured in terms of
- b: maximum branching factor of the search tree
- d: depth of the least-cost solution
- m: maximum depth of the state space (may be infinite)

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt

- We will view our systems as agents.
- An agent operates in a world which can be described by its Performance measure, Environment, Actuators, and Sensors.
- A rational agent chooses actions which maximize its performance measure, given the information it has.
- Agents range in complexity from simple reflex agents to complex utility-based agents.
- Problem-solving agents search through a problem or state space for an acceptable solution.
- The formalization of a good state space is hard, and critical to success. It must abstract the essence of the problem so that
- It is easier than the real-world problem.
- A solution can be found.
- The solution maps back to the real-world problem and solves it.

Paula Matuszek, CSC 8520, Fall 2005. Based on aima.eecs.berkeley.edu/slides-ppt/m2-agents.ppt