1 / 12

Attracting the Young to Agriculture (IYFF agenda ) 3-4 May, 2014 Bali, Indonesia

Attracting the Young to Agriculture (IYFF agenda ) 3-4 May, 2014 Bali, Indonesia. D.Indra , NAMAC. The plan. Main points Consultation to membership - youth members of NAMAC, through online discussion (Dec 25) and face to face (Dec 30)

Download Presentation

Attracting the Young to Agriculture (IYFF agenda ) 3-4 May, 2014 Bali, Indonesia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Attracting the Young to Agriculture (IYFF agenda)3-4 May, 2014 Bali, Indonesia D.Indra, NAMAC

  2. The plan Main points • Consultation to membership - youth members of NAMAC, through online discussion (Dec 25) and face to face (Dec 30) • Participatory research – use internal expert to design research and do desk study, use results of research by Mongol herders media agency (Jan 15) • Writing SMART proposals – hire expert to consolidate data and write proposal (Jan 15, 2014) • Lobby mapping and stakeholder analysis for lobby and advocacy – do lobby map and power matrix, meet NGOsand ministries

  3. The plan What was changed • NONE

  4. What was carried out in the period between the workshops Activities carried out • Consultation to membership - youth members of NAMAC, through online discussion (Dec 25) and face to face (Dec 19, 20) • Training /no connection with Youth in Agriculture project/ • Participatory research – use internal expert to design research and do desk study, use results of research by Mongol herders magazine /media agency/ • Writing SMART proposals – hire expert to consolidate data and write proposal /Shombodon.D/ • Lobby mapping and stakeholder analysis for lobby and advocacy – do lobby map and power matrix, meet NGOs and ministries

  5. What was carried out in the period between the workshops What was not possible to do • Not able to meet with ministries and NGOs in agri sector due to budget constraint and not suitable dates

  6. What was carried out in the period between the workshops Results so far • After consultation meeting, NAMAC youth members decided to meet annually (this year on Aug 15) – will be done in the province • NAMAC used research of media agency and discussed youth in agriculture issue with them • The “Mongol herder” media agency established the Young Herders Committee and NAMAC became one representative of Board meeting • the committee will organize a nationwide consultation among the youth (approx 500 herders) on may 9-10 (vice president will attend) under the auspices of PM, so government to cover all costs • Expected result: Vice-president asking FAO and ministry of labor, industry and agri, and NAMAC to organize farmers’ consultation

  7. Conclusions

  8. The plan and expectationsWas the plan realistic and adequate? YES

  9. ImplementationWhat was accomplished or not accomplished? What conditions were lacking? • We have done almost all our plans except the meeting with NGOs and government ministries due to lack of budget and date

  10. Main insights from FACT conceptsWhat particular aspects of the organisation’s work have been improved by the use of these concepts? Due to consultation to members: • Farmers getting closer, want to meet every year, discuss problem and what they can do by themselves and with NAMAC (effective contact) • The prime minister highly supports the planned consultation Due to participatory research: • We now have research on youth – now we can show that we know the issue and we can propose good solutions Due to SMART proposal: • Better proposal, already got results in short time, can more effectively lobby and advocate government through the committee Due to lobby mapping and stakeholder analysis: - Easier to lobby and have contact with decision makers

  11. Lessons learned (for improving the future use of FACT or similar concepts) • By consulting members and doing participatory research, we can get more support from members and decision makers • FACT can help members become more empowered and do things for themselves effectively • Consultation to members taught herders how to meet online • FACT was the first experience in real consultation and research – so it got enthusiastic support • Use of templates from AFA made it easy to write reports

  12. Thank you.

More Related