USE OF PROCESS DATA TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF CALL ATTEMPTS IN A TELEPHONE SURVEY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Use of process data to determine the number of call attempts in a telephone survey
Download
1 / 19

  • 44 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

USE OF PROCESS DATA TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF CALL ATTEMPTS IN A TELEPHONE SURVEY. Annica Isaksson Linköping University, Sweden Peter Lundquist Statistics Sweden Daniel Thorburn Stockholm University, Sweden . The Problem.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

USE OF PROCESS DATA TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF CALL ATTEMPTS IN A TELEPHONE SURVEY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Use of process data to determine the number of call attempts in a telephone survey

USE OF PROCESS DATA TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF CALL ATTEMPTS IN A TELEPHONE SURVEY

Annica Isaksson

Linköping University, Sweden

Peter Lundquist

Statistics Sweden

Daniel Thorburn

Stockholm University, Sweden

Q2008


The problem

The Problem

Consider a telephone survey of individuals, in which a maximum number A of call attempts is to be made to sampled individuals.

HOW SHALL A BE CHOSEN?

Part of a larger problem of designing efficient call scheduling algorithms.

Q2008


Prerequisites

Prerequisites

  • (Single-occasion survey)

  • Direct sampling from a frame with good population coverage

  • Estimation of a population total by the direct weighting estimator

Observed value for individual k (proxy for the true value µk)

Response set after A call attempts

Estimated response probability for individual k

after A call attempts

Inclusion probability for individual k

Q2008


The survey as a three stage process

The Survey as a Three-Stage Process

  • Stage 1: Sample selection

  • Stage 2: Contact and response Maximally A call attempts are made. Individuals respond in accordance with an unknown response distribution.

  • Stage 3: Measurement Observed values are related to the true values according to a measurement error model.

Q2008


Response model

Response Model

The sample can be divided into Hs response homogeneity groups (RHG) such that, for all A, given the sample,

  • all individuals within the same group have the same probability of responding

  • individuals respond independently of each other

  • individuals respond independently of each other after different numbers of call attempts

Q2008


Measurement error model

Measurement Error Model

For an individual k in RHG h, given the sample and that the individual responds at call attempt a,

Indicates if individual k responds at attempt a=ak

Random interviewer effect with expectation 0 and variance

True value for individual k

Random response error with expectation 0 and variance

Q2008


Bias and variance

Bias and Variance

Bias if the RHG model does not hold:

Sample covariance between response probabilities and design weighted true values

Average response probability within RHG

The variance of is derived in the paper

Q2008


Cost function

Cost Function

Q2008


Optimum a for rhg h

Optimum A for RHG h

Assume: of the costs are allocated to RHG h

Q2008


Optimum a for rhg h result

Optimum A for RHG h: Result

The optimum number of call attempts for RHG h is the number Ah that gives the lowest value on the function

Q2008


Our data

Our Data

LFS data from March-Dec. 2007, supplemented with:

  • Annual salary 2006 according to the Swedish Tax Register (our y)

  • Process data from WinDati (WD)

.

Note: not all WD events are call attempts

Q2008


Data processing and estimation

Data Processing and Estimation

  • Each monthly sample viewed as a SRS

  • Parameter: = total annual salary 2006

  • Bias within RHG h and month l estimated by

.

Q2008


Relative bias monthly averages

Relative Bias, Monthly Averages

Q2008


Measurement error model parameters

Measurement Error Model Parameters

Intraclass correlation, ICC (Biemer and Trewin, 1997):

= .002

= 55,267,619,616

= 110,979,155

.

Q2008


No bias icc 002

No Bias, ICC = .002

Q2008


Bias icc 002

Bias, ICC = .002

Q2008


Tentative results

Tentative Results

  • Efficient planning requires high-quality data on processes and costs

  • Perhaps the choice of A should be based on variance rather than MSE

Q2008


Discussion and future work

Discussion and Future Work

  • Do the results hold for other study variables, other survey settings?

  • Improved models for measurement errors, response and costs?

  • Develop a planning tool?

Q2008


Use of process data to determine the number of call attempts in a telephone survey

Thank you for your attention!

Annica Isaksson, annica.isaksson@liu.se

Peter Lundquist, peter.lundquist@scb.se

Q2008


  • Login