Osteoporosis clinical process framework
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 53

Osteoporosis Clinical Process Framework PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 77 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Osteoporosis Clinical Process Framework. Steven Levenson, MD, CMD. Normal and Osteoporotic Bone. The Clinical Process Framework Project. Now over a decade Started with “Green Bill” Coordinated effort between survey agency, providers, others Resulting clinical process frameworks

Download Presentation

Osteoporosis Clinical Process Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Osteoporosis clinical process framework

Osteoporosis Clinical Process Framework

Steven Levenson, MD, CMD


Normal and osteoporotic bone

Normal and Osteoporotic Bone


The clinical process framework project

The Clinical Process Framework Project

  • Now over a decade

  • Started with “Green Bill”

  • Coordinated effort between survey agency, providers, others

  • Resulting clinical process frameworks

    • Based on information in AMDA CPGs and other references and resources

  • A precursor to “Advancing Excellence” process frameworks


Care process steps

Care Process Steps

  • Assessment / Problem recognition

  • Diagnosis / Cause identification

  • Management / Treatment

  • Monitoring


Osteoporosis clinical process framework1

OSTEOPOROSIS Clinical Process Framework

  • Care process step

  • Expectations

  • Rationale


Assessment problem recognition

ASSESSMENT / PROBLEM RECOGNITION


Osteoporosis assessment problem recognition

Osteoporosis: Assessment / Problem Recognition

  • Step 1

    • Did staff and physician seek and document any history of osteoporosis?

  • Expectations

    • On admission and thereafter as indicated, staff and practitioner seek and document factors associated with, or presenting risk for, osteoporosis


Step 1 rationale

Step 1 Rationale

  • History may include

    • Loss of height

    • History of fractures (often with minimal or no trauma)

    • Chronic back pain due to vertebral compression fractures

    • Positive X-Ray finding of thinning of bone [osteopenia]

    • Positive bone density study (DEXA scan)


Osteoporosis assessment problem recognition1

Osteoporosis: Assessment / Problem Recognition

  • Step 2

    • Did staff identify individuals with (or risk for) osteoporosis and its complications?

  • Expectations

    • Staff and practitioner

      • Identify individuals with loss of bone mass and complications related to decreased bone mass

      • Identify and document risk factors for developing osteoporosis or for worsening of existing bone loss


Step 2 rationale

Step 2 Rationale

  • Risk factors may be

    • Modifiable, for example

      • Inadequate calcium and vitamin D intake

      • Excess alcohol intake

      • Smoking

      • Medications that impair bone metabolism

    • Nonmodifiable, for example

      • Age

      • Female gender

      • Caucasian or Asian race

      • Small body frame


Step 2 rationale1

Step 2 Rationale

  • Various medications can increase risk of osteoporosis, for example

    • Anticonvulsants, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), heparin, thyroid hormone replacement, glucocorticoids, Vitamin A


Osteoporosis in men significant risk factors

Osteoporosis In Men: Significant Risk Factors

  • Age (>70 years)

  • Low body weight (body mass index <20 to 25 kg/m2 or lower)

  • Weight loss (>10% compared with usual young or adult weight or weight loss in recent years)

  • Physical inactivity (no regular physical activity; e.g., walking, climbing stairs, housework, gardening


Osteoporosis in men significant risk factors1

Osteoporosis In Men: Significant Risk Factors

  • Use of oral corticosteroids

  • Previous fragility fracture

    • Reference: Qaseem A, Snow V, Shekelle P, Hopkins Are, Forciea MA, Owens DK; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Screening for osteoporosis in men: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):680-4


Step 2 rationale2

Step 2 Rationale

  • May be benefits to addressing modifiable risk factors

  • Risk factors for complications include

    • Fall history, gait and balance disturbances, medication adverse consequences, Vitamin D deficiency


Definitions

Definitions

  • Osteoporosis (women)

    • BMD that is 2.5 SD or more below the mean for women at age 30

  • Osteopenia

    • BMD that is 1-2.5 SD below the average, for young, healthy white women.

  • To date, similar criteria for osteoporosis in men


Standard deviations

Standard Deviations

  • Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation


Osteoporotic fracture risks over time

Osteoporotic Fracture Risks Over Time


Hip fracture risks in swedish women

Hip Fracture Risks in Swedish Women

  • Source: www.medicographia.com


Dexa scanner

DEXA Scanner


Bmd scoring

BMD Scoring

  • T score

    • Compares bone density with that of healthy young women

  • Z score

    • Compares bone density with that of other people of age, gender, and race


Bmd scanning

BMD Scanning

  • Also called dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or bone densitometry

    • An enhanced form of x-ray technology used to measure bone loss

    • Current standard for measuring bone mineral density (BMD)


Bmd scanning1

BMD Scanning

  • DXA most often done on lower spine and hips

  • CT scan with special software can also be used


Frax scoring

FRAX Scoring


Osteoporosis clinical process framework

FRAX

  • Computer-based screening tool that predicts the risk of developing osteoporosis

  • Scoring system utilizing BMD results

  • Developed by World Health Organization, WHO

  • Can help identify individuals who should have additional testing and treatment, also depending on prognosis


Osteoporosis assessment problem recognition2

Osteoporosis: Assessment / Problem Recognition

  • Step 3

    • Did staff and practitioner identify complications of osteoporosis?

  • Expectations

    • Staff and practitioner collaborate to identify complications

      • Examples: impaired mobility, pain at fracture sites, deformities, deconditioning, neurological complications, psychological issues

      • May include in care plan document


Diagnosis cause identification

DIAGNOSIS / CAUSE IDENTIFICATION

  • Step 4

    • Did practitioner and staff seek causes of osteoporosis or indicate why causes could not or should not be sought?


Diagnosis cause identification1

DIAGNOSIS / CAUSE IDENTIFICATION


Diagnosis cause identification2

DIAGNOSIS / CAUSE IDENTIFICATION

  • Expectations

    • Identify individuals who may benefit from additional workup

    • Identify any additional diagnostic workup indicated to help define presence, severity, and/or causes of decreased bone mass

    • Collaborate to document rationale for not screening or attempting to confirm suspected diagnosis of bone mass loss


Step 4 rationale common causes

Step 4 Rationale: Common Causes

  • Some medications (e.g., Dilantin, steroids)

  • Hyperthyroidism

  • Hyperparathyroidism

  • Chronic renal failure

  • Malabsorption syndromes

  • Multiple myeloma

  • Vitamin D deficiency


Step 4 rationale possible testing

Step 4 Rationale: Possible Testing

  • Additional screening or diagnostic testing may not be needed if clinical evidence has already suggested or confirmed condition

    • For example, positive X-Ray showing bone thinning, a high score on a risk assessment tool, or history of vertebral compression fractures


Step 4 rationale possible testing1

Step 4 Rationale: Possible Testing

  • In absence of existing confirmation of diagnosis, presence of more advanced bone loss or significant complications may warrant screening or diagnostic testing

    • In absence of contraindications (e.g., terminal condition or advanced medical illness


Step 4 rationale possible testing2

Step 4 Rationale: Possible Testing

  • Depending on the situation, additional tests may include

    • pDEXA scan for bone density screening

    • Serum calcium and Vitamin D levels

    • TSH (hyperthyroidism)

    • Renal function tests (chronic renal failure)


Treatment problem management

TREATMENT / PROBLEM MANAGEMENT


Step 5

Step 5

  • Did facility identify and initiate appropriate general and specific interventions?

  • Expectations

    • Staff and practitioner institute relevant general and cause-specific interventions, or provide clinically pertinent reason for not doing so


Step 5 rationale

Step 5 Rationale

  • Some individuals may benefit from risk reduction and cause management

    • Generic and cause-specific

      • Generic: those applicable to all at-risk individuals


Generic interventions

Generic Interventions

  • Calcium (total 1200-1500 mg/day from all sources)

  • Vitamin D (total 800-1000 IU/day from all sources) supplementation

    • These may reduce additional bone loss but will not significantly improve existing bone loss


Generic interventions1

Generic Interventions

  • Exercise—especially weight bearing activity—may reduce bone loss

  • Fall prevention strategies may help reduce falls and subsequent fall-related complications of decreased bone mass


Vitamin d

Vitamin D

  • Vitamin D appears to reduce fall risk

    • In addition to effects on bone density

  • Serum Vitamin D levels should be at least 24 ng/ml to reduce fall risk

  • Effect occurs after short duration of use

  • Toxicity is possible although rare

  • Watch for hypercalcemia

    • May bring out hyperparathyroidism


Step 6

Step 6

  • Did staff and practitioner consider possible individuals for whom additional treatment may be indicated?

  • Expectations

    • Practitioner and staff identify individuals who can benefit from additional treatments


Step 6 rationale

Step 6 Rationale

  • Several options for medications to try to reverse bone loss

    • Bisphosphonates

    • Calcitonin

    • Parathyroid hormone

    • Hormone replacement therapy or estrogen receptor modulators

    • Osteoclast inhibitors

  • All medications for osteoporosis treatment should be prescribed and given consistent with manufacturers’ specifications and pertinent warnings related to use

    • Including adverse consequences and drug interactions


Step 6 rationale1

Step 6 Rationale

  • Some individuals may not be able to tolerate side effects or comply with manufacturer’s specifications for taking these medications

  • Do vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty help to stabilize vertebral compression fractures?

    • NEJM 2009; 361:557-568 - May be no more beneficial than medical pain management


Step 7

Step 7

  • Did staff and practitioner address complications and related risk factors?

  • Expectations

    • Staff institute relevant fall prevention strategies

    • Staff and practitioner identify and address symptoms such as pain related to osteoporosis or its complications


Step 71

Step 7

  • Expectations

    • Staff and practitioner evaluate patient’s current medication regimen and address medications that

      • Are identified or suspected as affecting bone density

      • May predispose to complications from osteoporosis; e.g., increase fall risk and thereby may increase risk of fracture


Step 7 rationale

Step 7 Rationale

  • Measures to try to prevent falls and related injury may prevent injury-related complications due to osteoporosis

  • No interventions can prevent all falls

    • Sometimes necessary to focus on trying to minimize severity of complications, to extent possible


Monitoring

MONITORING


Step 8

Step 8

  • Did practitioner and staff follow up on individuals with osteoporosis?

  • Expectations

    • Practitioner and staff monitor progress of the condition and the individual’s response to any interventions

      • Based on criteria that are relevant to the individual resident


Step 8 rationale

Step 8 Rationale

  • Sometimes difficult to identify specific long-term benefits of osteoporosis treatment in individuals

  • Examples of monitoring may include—as clinically appropriate—functional capacity, degree of pain, and progression, stabilization, or reduction of bone mass loss


Step 9

Step 9

  • Did staff and physician consider justification for continuing current approaches?

  • Expectations

    • Staff and practitioner review information that can help identify the rationale for continuing treatment


Step 9 rationale

Step 9 Rationale

  • Various circumstances may affect decisions about continuing or modifying treatments

    • Prognosis

    • Responsiveness to treatment

    • Possibility for changing to a less obtrusive or lower-risk intervention

    • Resident satisfaction with the benefits of—or concern about complications related to—treatment


Step 9 rationale1

Step 9 Rationale

  • Reduced compliance with osteoporosis medications is common

    • Mostly due to adverse consequences


Step 10

Step 10

  • Did staff and practitioner monitor for, and address, complications of osteoporosis and of treatments for osteoporosis?

  • Expectations

    • Staff and practitioner monitor for, and manage, complications of osteoporosis and of various treatments for osteoporosis


Step 10 rationale

Step 10 Rationale

  • Side effects of osteoporosis medications may include

    • Symptoms of Vitamin D or calcium excess

    • Gastrointestinal irritation including erosive esophagitis or gastritis (bisphosphonates)

    • Bone pain

    • Others that are specific for the medication that is given


Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis


  • Login