Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with gld detector simulation
Download
1 / 30

Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on

Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation. 2007/Feb/5 ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group. Contents. Introduction Angular Resolution Study Position Resolution of ECAL cluster Direction of Reconstructed gamma

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation' - ornice


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with gld detector simulation

Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation

2007/Feb/5

ACFA ILC Workshop

M1 ICEPP, Tokyo

Hitoshi HANO

On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group


Contents
Contents detector simulation

  • Introduction

  • Angular Resolution Study

    • Position Resolution of ECAL cluster

    • Direction of Reconstructed gamma

  • Calorimeter Component Dependence

    • Cell size Dependence

    • Material Dependence

  • Summary


Motivation and pfa analysis

Measurement of the direction of non-pointing photon is important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

IP

Motivation and PFA Analysis

decay length :

[m]

  • To identify a non-pointing photon, we need to know angular resolution of the detector (EM Calorimeter).

We have studied angular resolution using full-simulator (Jupiter)

ECAL

In this study, we have used single-gamma coming from IP to evaluate angular resolution.


Gld detector geometry in jupiter
GLD Detector Geometry in Jupiter important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

  • GLD detector has large-radius and fine-segmented Calorimeter.

Calorimeter cell size

and absorber material

can be changed.

It’s important to optimize

Cost vs. Physics Performance.

ECAL geometry in Jupiter :

R [m]

Z [m]

Structure

W/Scinti./gap3/2/1(mm) x 33 layers cell size 1x1(cm2)

barrel

endcap

2.1-2.3

0.4-2.3

0-2.8

2.8-3.0

ECAL


Method of gamma reconstruction
Method of Gamma Reconstruction important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

  • Clustering

  • Find an energy-weighted central point of each layer

  • Fit each point with least-square method

  • Evaluate an angle between gamma-line and reconstructed gamma

Calorimeter

γ

IP (generated point)

reconstructed gamma


Angular resolution study

Angular Resolution Study important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

~ Position Resolution of Cluster ~


Method position resolution study of aaaaaaa isolated gamma cluster

θ important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.(φ)resolution [rad] = θ(φ)meas – θ(φ)MC

Method (position resolution study of aaaaaaa isolated gamma cluster)

  • Generate single-gamma from IP with random direction

  • Clustering (more details in next page)

  • Search energy-weighted central point of cluster

  • Evaluate θ, φ of a central point

  • Compare with MC truth

ECAL

central point

(θ,φ)

IP (generated point)

γ

clustering


Clustering method
Clustering Method important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

  • Find the highest energy deposit cell

  • Make a cone around the cell

  • Define cells which are inside of the cone as one cluster (around all layers)

  • Find energy-weighted central point

highest energy deposit cell

central point

clustering angle = 10°

IP (generated point)

[email protected]


Position resolution of cluster cell 1 cm
Position Resolution of Cluster important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.(cell : 1 cm)

barrel

endcap

barrel

endcap

1 GeV

2 GeV

5 GeV

10 GeV

σ [mrad]

σ [mrad]

|cos(θ)|

|cos(θ)|

θ resolution is better for larger cos(θ)

φ resolution is worse for larger cos(θ)

ECAL

geometrical effect

Position resolution : ~0.1 [cm]

IP (generated point)

[email protected]


Energy dependent result of position resolution
Energy important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.DependentResult of position resolution

1GeV

2GeV

σ [mrad]

σ [mrad]

5GeV

10GeV

1/√E

1/√E

θ barrel:

[mrad]

φ barrel:

[mrad]

θ endcap:

[mrad]

φ endcap:

[mrad]


Angular resolution study1

Angular Resolution Study important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

~ Direction of Reconstructed gamma ~


Method angular resolution study of reconstructed gamma
Method (angular resolution study of important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios. reconstructed gamma)

  • Clustering

  • Find an energy-weighted central point of each layer

  • Fit each point with least-square method

  • Evaluate an angle between gamma-line and reconstructed gamma

Calorimeter

γ

IP (shot point)

reconstructed gamma


Histogram and angular resolution

r important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

d

Histogram and Angular Resolution

γ

central point of cluster

IP

d

r

reconstructed gamma

angle [rad] = r/d

  • r histogram F(r)

fitting function

σ = 48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad]

[email protected]


Energy dependence 1 2 5 10 50gev

[mrad] important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

Energy Dependence (1,2,5,10,50GeV)

1GeV

2GeV

σ [mrad]

Average over full acceptance

10GeV

5GeV

50GeV

1/√E


Shoot from another point gamma@10gev

IP important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

ECAL

Shoot from another point [email protected]

  • Shoot from x=y=20cm, z=0

reconstructed gamma

  • Shoot from IP

IP

ECAL

σ= 48.3±0.3[mrad]

σ= 48.6±0.3[mrad]

If gamma has been shot from another position, we could not observe significant difference.


Calorimeter component dependence

Calorimeter Component Dependence important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.


Structure cell size dependence
Structure (cell size dependence) important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

gamma : E = 10GeV

33 layers

How about cell size dependence?


Cell size dependence
Cell size dependence important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

1 [cm] : 48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad] 0.5 [cm] : 46.4 ± 0.3 [mrad]

<5%

gamma @10GeV

We could not observe significant improvement from 1cm to 0.5cm


Structure energy dependence
Structure (energy dependence) important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

gamma : E = 1~10GeV

33 layers

How about energy dependence between 1cm and 0.5cm?


Energy dependence 1 2 5 10gev
Energy Dependence (1,2,5,10GeV) important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

1GeV

2GeV

5GeV

10GeV

No significant difference has been observed between 1cm and 0.5cm around all of energy.


Structure absorber dependence
Structure (Absorber dependence) important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

gamma : E = 10GeV

33 layers

How about absorber dependence?


Absorber dependence tungsten lead
Absorber Dependence (Tungsten, Lead) important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

Tungsten[3mm]

Lead[4.8mm]

Same total radiation length

Lead[3mm]

Tungsten [3mm] : 48.3 ± 0.3 [mrad] Lead [4.8mm] : 45.5 ± 0.3 [mrad]

@1x1 [cm]

Angular resolution with Lead is better than Tungsten


Hit distribution
Hit Distribution important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

reconstructed gamma

Angular resolution is

better than Tungsten,

since shower length is

longer in Lead

gamma MC

depth

gamma MC

reconstructed gamma

depth


Summary
Summary important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

  • Angular resolution of default-GLD Calorimeter (W:1cm)

    • The angular resolution is estimated to be 125mrad/√(E/GeV)

  • Dependence on cell size granularity and material dependence (W, Pb) has been studied

    • No significant difference has been observed between 1cm and 0.5cm

    • Lead is better than Tungsten for isolated gamma

    • Energy resolution is same

    • How about energy resolution for jet ?

Next speaker

T.Yoshioka


Backup

Backup important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.


Fitting method
Fitting method important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

Find a central point of each layer by energy weighted mean

Fitting 2-dimentions (x-y)

y

y’

x

Fitting new 2-dimentions (y’-z)

weighted by energy deposit

z

y’

Distance[cm]


Hitting distribution and average
Hitting distribution and Average important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.


Hit distribution1
Hit Distribution important for GMSB (gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking) scenarios.

reconstructed gamma

gamma MC

gamma MC

reconstructed gamma

depth

depth

Angular resolution is better than Tungsten,

since Lead has geometrical deeper distribution.


ad