1 / 14

Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement

Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement. December 11, 2012. Background. March 2010 – State Superintendent convenes feasibility committee to explore options for statewide kindergarten readiness assessment

Download Presentation

Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Kindergarten Individual Development Survey(KIDS)District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012

  2. Background March 2010 – State Superintendent convenes feasibility committee to explore options for statewide kindergarten readiness assessment 2011-2012 school year – Committee researches options and chooses Desired Results Developmental Profile – School Readiness instrument as starting point 2012-2013 – 5,000 students statewide (with adapted DRDP-SR) – 56 districts, including D97 2013-2014 – 10,000 students statewide 2014-2015 – 30,000 students statewide (calibration of final KIDS draft) 2015-2016 – full implementation statewide

  3. Goals of KIDS Assessment Promote success of every child Guide professional development Support alignment of early childhood and elementary school systems Document the important role of early childhood programs Enable the State to respond to identified needs

  4. Overview of KIDS Assessment An individual, observational formative assessment Based on development research and theory Evidence collected three times each year Provides information to better address student needs over time Covers five domains with 30 measures

  5. Domains Addressed English Language Development Self and Social Development Self Regulation Language and Literacy Development Mathematical Development NOTE: Multiple measures in each domain

  6. Domains

  7. Developmental Levels Rated English Language Development: Discovering Exploring Developing Building Integrating All other domains: Exploring Developing Building Integrating Applying

  8. Rating Record Example

  9. Expectations for Assessment Administration Teachers rate all kindergarten students on all measures three times per year Assistants, volunteers, and specialists can provide evidence but classroom teacher makes final rating decisions Mastery exhibited through confident performance over time in variety of settings Assessments completed at specific points in the year

  10. Purpose for Teachers Provides valid and reliable data for measuring student development and progress Integrates information from other required assessments Informs instruction using a strengths-based approach -- building from what children know and can do

  11. 2012-2013 KIDS Implementation Statewide: 56 districts Including District 97 24 district kindergarten teachers (2/3 of total) Some teachers trained in summer, some in fall September and October – meetings focused on understanding expectations and process Half day release time for teachers trained in the summer to record evidence of students progress on measures November Institute Day – sharing session iPads – All teachers trained to use KIDS received an iPad from ISBE

  12. Training and Support Regina Macaskill and Felicia Starks Turner serve as KIDS coaches Two-day training for participating teachers Ongoing support via KIDS website

  13. State SIS Enrollment Eighth Year of SIS Additional data items each year 2

  14. 2012-2013 Teachers and the courses they teach Students assigned to courses No “graded” assessment yet

More Related