FERRI SUSANTO, 2201405549
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 7

Identitas Mahasiswa PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 81 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

FERRI SUSANTO, 2201405549 THE MASTERY OF SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT WRITTEN BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 4 CEPIRING IN ACADEMIC YEARS OF 2009/2010. Identitas Mahasiswa.

Download Presentation

Identitas Mahasiswa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Identitas mahasiswa

  • FERRI SUSANTO, 2201405549THE MASTERY OF SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT WRITTEN BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 4 CEPIRING IN ACADEMIC YEARS OF 2009/2010


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Identitas Mahasiswa

  • - NAMA : FERRI SUSANTO - NIM : 2201405549 - PRODI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS - FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni - EMAIL : feri_well13 pada domain yahoo.com - PEMBIMBING 1 : Widhiyanto, S.Pd., M.Pd. - PEMBIMBING 2 : Drs. Suprapto, M.Hum. - TGL UJIAN : 2010-08-18


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Judul

  • THE MASTERY OF SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT WRITTEN BY THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 4 CEPIRING IN ACADEMIC YEARS OF 2009/2010


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Abstrak

  • This study is about the mastery of subject-verb agreement in descriptivetext written by the eighth-grade students of SMP N 4 Cepiring in the academicyear of 2009/2010 and conducted to measure and describe the students’ mastery insubject-verb agreement in descriptive text.The population of the study was the eighth-grade students of SMP N 4Cepiring in academic year of 2009/2010. The number of the sample was 20% or40 students representing 200 students. The sample was drawn from the populationby doing random sampling technique.The writer used an achievement test in order to find out the students’mastery level. In conducting the test, the writer absolutely needed a testinstrument. The instrument was a written test consisted of 40 test items formed incompletion test which has tried-out first in order to find the validity and reliabilityof the test. The number of the test items in try-out test is 50 items. In the test,students were asked to fill the blank in a sentence by the word in the bracket. Thetest instrument was classified into seven guidelines. They were subject-verbagreement used third person pronoun, subject-verb agreement with someirregularities, subject-verb agreement used there/here be, subject-verb agreementused expression of quantity, subject-verb agreement used indefinite pronoun,subject-verb agreement used either, neither, other and another, and subject-verbagreement used gerund.According to the result of this study, it shows that the average proportion is63,75. It means that the students’ mastery level in subject-verb agreement belongsto the average level. Eight (20%) of forty students have excellent achievement.Nine (22,5%) of forty students have good achievement. Then, 20% of fortystudents just get average achievement. Four students are in poor criteria, andeleven students fail the achievement test.Then the writer suggest the teacher to pay attention to this material, maybethe teacher should reconstruct the teaching program, especially in subject-verbagreement.


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Kata Kunci

  • Junior High School, Descriptive, Writing.


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Referensi

  • Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 1989. Understanding and Using English Grammar. NewJersey: Prentice Hall.Brown, J. D. 1980. Principles and Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey:Prentice Hall. Inc. Englewood Cliffs.Burchfield, R. W. 1996. Modern English Usage. Oxford England: ClarendonPress. Used with the permission of Oxford University Press.Cook, Stanley and Richard W. Sutter. 1980. The Scope of Grammar. New York:Mc. Grow-Hill.Finocchiaro, Marry. Ph.D. 1972. English as A Second Language From Theory toPractice. New York: Regents Publishing Company, Inc.Frank, M.1972. Modern English. New York Prentice- Hall Inc.Harris, D.P. 1969. Teaching English as a Second Language. New York: Mc GrawHill Book Company.Hornby, A. S. 1987. Guide to Patterns and Usage in English. New Jersey: OxfordUniversity Press.http:// www. myenglishteacher.net/subject_verb_agreement.html.http:// www. new. towson.edu/ows/module SVAGR.htm.http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/Literacy/ReferenceMaterials/GlossaryOfLiteracyTerms/WhatIsAClozeProcedure.htmhttp://www.sil.org/lingualinks/literacy/implementaliteracyprogram/HowToPrepareTextsForAClozeProc.htmhttp://www.sil.org/lingualinks/literacy/implementaliteracyprogram/HowToUseAClozeProcedureWithSil.htmMoore, Gary W. 1983. Developing and Evaluating. Educational Research.Canada: Little Brown Company.Murcia, Marianne C. and Diane Larsen Freeman. 1983. The Grammar Book.Cambridge, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publisher, Inc.Ramelan. 1992. Introduction to Linguistic Analysis. Semarang: IKIP SemarangPress.Robert, Paul. 1985. Understanding English. New York: Harper and RowPublisher.Veit, Richard. 1985. Discovering English Grammar. Boston: Houghton MufflinCompany.Tinambunan, Wilmar. 1988. Evaluation of Students Achievement. Jakarta:Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Terima Kasih

  • http://unnes.ac.id


  • Login