1 / 9

High Stakes Testing

High Stakes Testing. EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing. High stakes testing is…

oria
Download Presentation

High Stakes Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos

  2. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • High stakes testing is… • Using standardized test scores, either by themselves or in conjunction with other data, to determine whether students get promoted to the next grade or graduate from high school, whether teachers and administrators receive financial rewards or demotions, and whether school districts receive additional state funds or lose their accreditation.

  3. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • The Federal Initiative: No Child LeftBehind (NCLB)  Requirements of NCLB – Standards: States must have challenging content and achievement standards in math, reading/language arts, science – Testing: Annual testing of students in grades 3-12 in math, reading/language arts, science – Adequate yearly progress (AYP): States must demonstrate each year that an additional percentage of all students have reached the proficient level – Reporting: States and school districts must report how every group of students has performed on the annual assessment – Accountability: Rewards or punishments given to successful or failing schools

  4. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • Problems Implementing NCLB  States may weaken standards to meet AYP  States may lower the score that determines proficiency for same reason  Law ignores long-standing validity issues and standardized testing (minorities, ELL students, and students with disabilities)  Few students receive free tutoring mandated by the law  State departments of education lack the resources to carry out their responsibilities

  5. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • Arguments in Support of High-StakesTesting Programs  Goal Clarity  Improved Quality Control  Beneficial Effects for Teaching  Beneficial Effects for Students

  6. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • Arguments Critical of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Structural Limitations  Misinterpretation and Misuse of Test Results  A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Motivation  A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Standards • Undesirable Side Effects

  7. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • Research on the Effects of High-Stakes Testing Programs  Effect on Achievement  Effect on Motivation  Effect on Teachers and Teaching  Effect on the Curriculum • Effect on the Dropout Rate  Use of School Choice and Supplemental Instructional Services

  8. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • Recommendation for Improving High-Stakes Testing Each state should adopt only those content standards that represent the most important knowledge and skills that students need to learn A state’s content standards should clearly describe exactly what is being assessed so teachers can create lessons that directly address those standards Scores on a state assessment should be reported on a standard-by-standard basis for each student, school, and district States should provide school districts with additional assessment procedures to assess those standards that the required assessment does not cover States should monitor the curricula of school districts to ensure that instruction addresses all content standards and subjects, not just those assessed by the required state test

  9. Using Standardized Tests for Accountability Purposes: High-Stakes Testing • Recommendation for Improving High-Stakes Testing • States should provide school districts with additional assessment procedures to assess those standards that the required assessment does not cover • States should monitor the curricula of school districts to ensure that instruction addresses all content standards and subjects, not just those assessed by the required state test • State assessments should be designed so that all students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate which of the state’s standards they have mastered • All tests should satisfy the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing of the American Educational Research Association and similar test quality guidelines • Teachers and principals should receive professional development training that helps them use test results to optimize children’s learning

More Related