1 / 3

More Euler & Perfect Numbers (3/28)

More Euler & Perfect Numbers (3/28). Again: Euler’s Theorem on Perfect Numbers. Every even perfect number is of the form 2 p – 1 (2 p – 1) where p and 2 p – 1 are prime. Proof. (This proof makes use of the properties of the sigma function.)

oralee
Download Presentation

More Euler & Perfect Numbers (3/28)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. More Euler & Perfect Numbers (3/28) • Again:Euler’s Theorem on Perfect Numbers. Every even perfect number is of the form 2p – 1 (2p – 1) where p and 2p – 1 are prime. • Proof. (This proof makes use of the properties of the sigma function.) • Suppose n is an even perfect number. Write n = 2km where (note!) k > 0 and m is odd (so GCD(2k, m) = 1). • Hence (n) = (2k) (m) = (2k+1– 1) (m), but also n is perfect, so we also have (n) = 2n = 2k+1m.

  2. Proof continued • So we have two formulas for (n) which we can equate:2k+1m = (2k+1 – 1) (m) . • Crucial moment: Since 2k+1 – 1 is odd, we have that2k+1 divides (m), so (m) = 2k+1c for some c. • This then gives us a formula for m in terms of k and c:2k+1m = (2k+1 – 1) 2k+1c, and canceling 2k+1, we getm = (2k+1 – 1)c . • Note that if c = 1, we’re almost done. Note also (crucial moment again!) that c  m since k > 0 (!!). Just suppose c > 1, then 1, c, and m are distinct divisors of m.

  3. Here comes the finish line! • Okay, so then 2k+1c = (m)  1 + c + m = 1 + c +(2k+1 – 1)c = 1 + 2k+1c . • I don’t think so! Hence our assumption that c > 1 must have false, so c = 1, and so m = 2k+1– 1 and n = 2k (2k+1 – 1). Almost done. • Finally, we claim m = 2k+1 – 1 must be prime. Since(m) = 2k+1 = 1 + (2k+1– 1) = 1 + m, the only divisors of m are 1 and itself! • Finally finally, since m = 2k+1 – 1 is prime, it must be that k + 1 is prime (why??), so set p = k+ 1, and we have n = 2p-1(2p– 1) as required. • QED!!!! (Whew!)

More Related