1 / 35

11th euroCRIS Strategic Seminar Brussel , Sep 9 – 10 2013 Discovery Metadata Friedrich Summann

11th euroCRIS Strategic Seminar Brussel , Sep 9 – 10 2013 Discovery Metadata Friedrich Summann COAR / Bielefeld University Library. Discovery Metadata. Overview Introduction Institutional Repositories – Metadata Issues Institutional Repositories – future challenges Examples.

oralee
Download Presentation

11th euroCRIS Strategic Seminar Brussel , Sep 9 – 10 2013 Discovery Metadata Friedrich Summann

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 11th euroCRIS Strategic Seminar Brussel, Sep 9 – 10 2013 Discovery Metadata Friedrich Summann COAR / Bielefeld University Library

  2. Discovery Metadata Overview • Introduction • InstitutionalRepositories – MetadataIssues • InstitutionalRepositories – futurechallenges • Examples

  3. COAR Confederationof Open Access Repositories • Enhancesthevisibilityofresearchoutputs • Pavestheroadtointeroperability • Fostersknowledgeexchange on repositoryissues • Strengthens international open accessimplementation

  4. Metadata Background • DRIVER Guidelines2008 • OpenAireGuidelines • DINI Certificate 2010 (2013) • OAI-PMH Harvestingfor BASE / DRIVER / OpenAire

  5. Discovery Experience • Harvesting (OAI-PMH) (BASE, DRIVER, OpenAire) • 3300 Repositories (2700 active) • 70 Mill. Metadata Records (50 Mill. active) • Ingesting(proprietary APIs) (local PUB system) • Localunit/persondata • ISI, ArXIV, INSPIRE, PubMedimport • UK PMC Research Data import • Metadatenfetch ISI, ArXIV, INSPIRE, PubMed • ISI citationinformation

  6. The IR – past, present, future • Startedlateninetees • Contents startingwiththesis • OAI-PMH definition 2001 • Open Access movement • Establishing a global repositorynetwork • Extending • Size • Quality • Services

  7. DRIVER Guidelines • provides orientation • for managers of new repositories to define their local data-management policies • for managers of existing repositories to take steps towards improved service • for developers of repository platforms to add supportive functionalities in future versions

  8. DRIVER Guidelines • Focus on: • TextualResources • Usingoai_dcasmetadataformat • OAI-PMH: Protocol Requirements • OAI-PMH: Additional Requirements • DRIVER DC: MetadataRequirements

  9. OAI-PMH : Protocol Requirements • Stability • Protocol compliance (OAI-PMH 2.0) • XML validity • Support ofIncrementalHarvesting • Deletingstrategy • (persistent, transient) • Set for OA documents(driver) • Batch size(100 - 500 records per response) • Resumption Token lifespan (at least 24 hours)

  10. OAI-PMH : MetadataRequirements • Fulltext link • Content Recommendations • identifier • creator • contributor • source (citation) • Standardized Contents • type • language • date

  11. Repository Metadata • Repository Type • Technical Platform • Country • Classificationused • Geocodes • Start page • Institutionalaffiliation

  12. The IR – past, present, future • More than 3000 repositories, around 70 Mill. Objects • World-widecoverage • But: InstitutionalRepositoriesareat a turning-point: • More andmoreoverlappingsystems • local(CRIS, Publishing Platform, etc) • external (SubjectRepositories, ResearchGate etc.) • Scholarlycommunicationprocesschanges

  13. COAR Interoperability Project • Phase 1: The Case for Interoperability for Open Access Repositories • Phase 2: Open Discussion • Phase 3: The Current State of Open Access Repository Interoperability (2012) • Phase 4: COAR Roadmap for Future Directions for Repositories Interoperability

  14. The repositorylandscape (internalandexternal)

  15. Local Repository Landscape

  16. DraftInteroperabilityRoadmap • CurrentSituation and Strategic Challenges • Vision, Goal, Objectives • Users andStakeholders Needs • Scientists(author, reader) • Institution • Funderorganizations • Publishers, informationcompanies • The Repository Landscape • InteroperabilityIssues • The Road Map

  17. A special case: Interoperability CRIS systems - IRs

  18. The CRIS – IR relation

  19. The IR - CRIS relation

  20. Interoperabilityissuesandusecases • Visibility(googlemetrics, webometrics, statistics) • Data issues(Formats, quality, enhancedpublications, linkeddata, researchdata) • Sustainability(services, documents) • Add-on servicesandfeatures(embedding, publicationlists, export, bibliometrics) • Technical basics(architecture, protocols)

  21. MetadataIssues • Extended Metadata Formats • Data Curation (manually/automatically) • MetadataEnhancement • Linked Open Data • Enhanced Publications • Automatic Classification • Research Data

  22. MetadataIngest • Based on proprietary APIs • Localunit/persondata • ISI, ArXIV, INSPIRE, PubMedimport • UK PMC Research Data import • Metadatenfetch ISI, ArXiv, INSPIRE, PubMed • ISI citationinformation

  23. MetadataRequirements • Quality (followingtheguidelines) • Richness • Stability • Updated • Relations information • APIs (bi-directional)

  24. Example: ourlocalapproach • NoCRIS systemavailable • Norepositoryplatformanymore • but a publicationmanagementsystem • (open sourcecooperationwith UL Lund, UL Gent) • Extendingthissystem • Research Data • Project Information • Awards Information

  25. Institutional Repository • someexamplesoffuture • developments

  26. Embed Generator (Publication Lists)

  27. Thankyou! Friedrich Summann friedrich.summann@uni-bielefeld.de

More Related