Aeronautics and Air Transport The 2 nd Call for Proposals and beyond Dietrich Knörzer

1. Aeronautics and Air Transport The 2nd Call for Proposals and beyond Dietrich Knörzer DG RTD-H.3 - Aeronautics Wien, 10. Januar 2008

2. Content • The 7th Research Framework Programme • The First Call for Proposals 2007 • Results and Lessons Learnt • Changes against FP6 • The 2nd Call for Proposals 2008 • The Joint Technology Initiative “Clean Sky” • Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR)

3. Participation in FP7 • EU of 27 • Candidate countries: • Croatia • Turkey • Associated Countries: • Island • Israel • Norway • Switzerland All countries contributed to the financing of the Framework Programme by a fraction of their gross national product

4. 7th Framework Programme Four Specific Programmes Corresponding to four major objectives of European research policy • Cooperation (32413 million Euro) Support will be given to the whole range of research activities carried out in trans-national cooperation • Ideas (7510 millon Euro) An autonomous European Research Council will be created to support investigator-driven “frontier research”. • People (4750 million Euro) The activities support training and career development of researchers, referred to as “Marie Curie” actions, • Capacities (4097 million Euro) Key aspects of European research and innovation capacities will be supported: research infrastructures; research for the benefit of SMEs; regional research driven clusters. DG RTD-H.3 Aeronautics - 4

5. 7th Research Framework ProgrammeBudget Breakdown Budget 2007 - 2013: 50.521 million Euro(+ nuclear JRC and EURATOM)

6. European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020*The Goals for 2020 • 80% cut in NOx emissions • Halving perceived aircraft noise • Five-fold reduction in accidents • Air traffic system capable of handling 16 million flights a year • 50% cut in CO2 emissions per pass-Km • 99% of all flights within 15 minutes of timetable *) published in 2001

7. 7th Framework Programme Aeronautics & Air Transport(2007 – 2013) Workprogramme Activities • Thegreeningof air transport • Increasingtimeefficiency • Ensuring customersatisfaction and safety • Improving costefficiency • Protectionof the aircraft and passengers • Pioneeringthe air transport of the future

8. F.P.7Scenario for Aeronautics & Air Transport(2007 – 2013) RTD Activities • Collaborative Research (CP) • Level 1 - Upstream RTD (Small – medium projects, as before STREP, CTP) • Level 2 - Focussed integration and validation RTD (Medium - large projects, asbefore IP, TP; specific topics for each call) • Joint Technology Initiative – Level 3 (Focussed system demonstration, novel scheme) Activities for Structuring European Aeronautics Research • Networks of Excellence (NoE) (Specific topics for each call) • Coordination and Support Actions (CSA)

9. Research and technology acquisition Product development Production -10 -5 Research / Technology and Product Development in Aeronautics Fundamental knowledge Technology development Technologyvalidation Demonstrators Prototypes Product definition Product design and development EU Framework Programme Product demonstration Level 1 Collaborative Research Level 2 Joint Technology Initiative Novel F.P.7 Concept: EUREKA 0 years +5

10. Call and Budget Aeronautics (RTD)

11. Overall Results of 1st Call AAT

12. 1st Call - Ranked Priority List

13. 1st Call - Results of Level 2

14. Priority List Proposed for Funding Level 1 and CSA

15. Success Rate of the 1st Callby Instrument • Level 1: 26 out of 167 proposals • Level 2: 4 out of 5 proposals • CSA: 6 out of 20 proposals DG Research-H.3 Aeronautics –DK-10-2007 - 15

16. 1st Call FP7 – 2007 AATSummary of Proposal Failure 1. Scientific and/or technological excellence - Fail to position the work in relation to present state-of-the-art - Level of innovation is too low - Not convincing that technical challenges can be met - Lack of focus in the technical objectives, too many items without synergy 2. Quality and efficiency of implementation and management - Management structure is very weak. - Very little real cooperation between key partners. - Risk assessment and management is not convincingly addressed - Partners have not sufficient critical mass to address all diverse areas - Funding requested is considered too large for the expected results 3. Potential impact through development, dissemination and use of results - Dissemination is weak - Impact/funding ratio appears low.

17. Changed Terminology of FP7 Sources: FR/IR & FP7/RfP • “Contract” becomes “Grant Agreement” • “Contractor” becomes “Beneficiary” • “Instruments” become “Funding Schemes” • “Audit certificate” becomes “Certificate on Financial Statement”

18. Changes of FP7 against FP6 • Up to 75 % EU funding for SME and research institutes • No financial collective responsibility • “Technical responsibility” to carry out the project jointly and severally • No limits for administrative management costs • Guarantee Fund

19. Preview of Second CallFP7-AAT-2008-RTD-2

20. Indicative Timetablefor the Preparation of the2nd Call Aeronautics & Air Transport First meeting with Industry on Content March 2007 Discussion with Member & Assoc. States 27th July 2007 Approval of 2nd Call by Member & Assoc. 3rd Oct. 2007 Publication of 2nd Call for Proposals 30th Nov. 2007 Deadline for submission7th May 2008 Tentative EC Budget: ~ 200 million €* *) Budget from the EC Household 2008 and 2009

21. The Greening of Air Transport Increasing Time Efficiency Ensuring Customer Satisfaction and Safety Improving Cost Efficiency Protection of Aircraft and Passengers Pioneering the Air Transport of the Future “Clean Sky” JTI Aeronautics and Air Transport 2nd Call – Overview Workprogramme Level 1 Upstream RTD from basic research to validation at component or subsystem level –CP, CSA Level 2 Focussed downstream RTD – Multidisciplinary integration and validation at systems level -CP Level 3 RTD up to the highest technology readiness – final proof in systems of systems –JTI, JU SESAR JU Structuring Aeronautics Researchthrough lasting integration- NoE Supporting Programme implementation– setting mechanisms and strategies –CSA(and CP)

22. Level 2 Topics of 2nd Call • Lowering external noise • Health management and permanent serviceable fleet • Avionics for new cockpit and all-conditions operation • Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise • Network centric aircraft communications for global aircraft operations • Air transport system security

23. Level 2 Topic under ” The Greening of Air Transport ” Lowering External Noise Integration & Validation of “2nd generation” noise reduction technologies: - engine (inlet, fan, bypass duct, advanced propellers,turbo-machinery, combustor, exhaust system,jet) and - airframe noise (wing systems, landing gear,…) Multidisciplinary approach including: - local control: active noise generation and flow control - adaptive and variable concepts, - trade-offs: integration (aircraft, nacelle, engine) performance (aerodynamics, weight, cost) environmental (noise versus emissions). Adjustable to future engines and aircraft architectures

24. Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Time Efficiency ” (1) Health Management & Permanent Serviceable Fleet To ensure continuous aircraft availability at operation (less disruptions -> more time efficiency, less costs & more safety) Development, Integration & Validation of aircraft & engine health monitoring and management technologies, services and processes (incl. operations & IT sys). Integrating interoperable aircraft and ground segments, including the - operators, - MROs (Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul) and - manufacturers (supply chain, OEMs) Best value/cost contributing to diagnosis/prognosis, decision making, to enable a global maintenance system, delivering: - standardisedmaintenance system architecture (validation: test platform). - key health monitoring technologies (validation: testrigs &large scale testing).

25. Level 2 topic under ” Increasing Time Efficiency ” (2) Avionics for New Cockpit & All-conditions Operation New aircraft operational challenges: - external perturbations, - automation, - crew-centred interface design, incl. future single pilot operations. Development of a core flight deck architecture, integrating technologies eg: improved sensors and data-fusion, task tailored, intuitive graphical, interfaces, 3D audio environment, head mounted technologies, voice inputs, integrated flight bags. Anticipation & avoidance of perturbations in-flight or on-ground, including weather eg: enhanced vision systems and 3D situational awareness, weather surveillance sensors and new navigation capabilities. Validation in synthetic environments / ground test benches / flight tests.

26. Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Cost Efficiency ” (1) Full Virtuality in Design and Product Development within the Extended Enterprise Reduce time to market and development cost through a new paradigm - based on concurrent engineering - supported by virtual reality across the whole cycle (from conceptual design……. to testing and certification), - involving multidisciplinary teams at all levels - collaborating in an extended enterprise concept. Functionalities to integrate in the framework e. g.: - multi-physics analysis at aircraft, systems, subsystems & component, - "in-context" interactive knowledge design & decision support, - management of uncertainty in the development cycle, - methods to control design evolution across pre-design and dev., - virtual testing to reduce or eliminate the need of physical testing. Validation: through test cases from real design, development and certification

27. Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Cost Efficiency ” (2) Network centric aircraft communications for global aircraft operations Definition, development & demonstration of an aircraft communication concept which will integrate a full range of applications and services eg: - airlines operations, - cabin crew operations, - in-flight and on-ground passenger services, - airport operations, - security services and - air traffic management related operations (in line with SESAR), including the unification of all the related networking protocols. Definition of standarddata interfaces with current & future networks. Development of proved concepts for transition from current to new system.

28. Level 2 Topic under “Protection of Aircraft and Passengers” Air Transport System Security To detect and respond to any threat. To survive the effects of hostile actions. On-ground & In-flight threats e. g. - internal: attacks to crew / passengers, dangerous materials, explosives - external: missile or electronic attacks. Integration and validation of a global framework to security embracing: - aircraft - airport , and - air traffic operations. Integrating airborne with ground systems: merging information to react. Attention to future international regulations, standardisation & certification. Validation: simulation (&training) platforms, full scale live trials.

29. Subjects for Focused Research Collaborative Projects (CP-FP = Level 1) and Coordination Actions (CSA-CA) • Flight Physics • Aero-structures • Propulsion • Systems & Equipment • Avionics • Design Systems and Tools • Production • Maintenance • Air Traffic Management • Airports • Human Factors These subjects are likely to remain for all the duration of FP7

30. New Level 1 Topics: Promising Pioneering Ideas in Air Transport • Based upon ACARE’s "Out of the Box” study for radical changes • The Cruiser/feeder concept. Very large aircraft flying nearly permanently on stable circuits being fed with passengers from feeder aircraft. • Take-off and landing using ground-based power. Replacing on-board systems and fuel with ground systems and power. • Personal air transport systems. Operational concepts (on-board and on-ground) and vehicle technologies for individual transportation. • New sources of aircraft main propulsive power. New views of propulsion beyond gas turbine concept, using other energy sources. • “Greening”: Flight and Air Traffic management. Adopting alternative flight profiles and altitudes for reduced emissions.

31. International Co-operation:All activities open; especially encouraged to tackle global Safety & Environment issues. • In addition, enhanced collaboration encouraged on certain topics at Level1 with selected countries based on recent stimulation actions with Russia, South Africa, India and China. • Cross-cutting activities - Support Actions: • Two topics suppressed (SME stimulation, radical changes stimulation) • Four new topics added (Retrofitting, raising public awareness, support to dissemination, support to conferences) • ERA-Net • No Networks of Excellence; • Funding threshold Level 1- Level 2reduced from 8 M€ down to 6 M€. • Maximum funding for Level 2reduced from 60 M€ down to 50 M€. • Split budget for Level 1/Level 2at 50%/ 50% Other Highlights

32. International Cooperation in Aeronautics Research Seventh Research Framework Programme Participation by legal entities from third countries • W • EC H1 • Third level • Fourth level • Fifth level EU + Associated Partners “ICPC” High income No cooperation 1

33. Joint Technology Initiatives“Important projects of common European interest”(cf. Art. 87 3b) • Identification criteria include: • Added value of European-level intervention • Strength of commitmentfrom industry • Degree and clarity of definition of objectives • Scale of impact on industrial competitiveness and growth • Importanceof contribution to broader policy objectives • Capacity to attract additional national support and leverageindustry funding • Inability of existing instruments to achieve objectives

34. CandidateJoint Technology Initiatives Global Monitoring for Environment and Security Hydrogen and Fuel Cells for a Sustainable Energy Future Aeronautics Clean Sky* Towards new Nanoelectronics Approaches (ENIAC)* Innovative Medicines for the Citizens of Europe (IMI)* Embedded systems (ARTEMIS)* Other possible themes to be identified later… *) Decided by Council

35. Aeronautics JTI « Clean Sky » Objectives: • To provide a step forward in the technology capability of ATS environmentally friendly systems: • Integration of advanced technologies • Full scale demonstrators • To improve on the overall ATS impact on environment: • Noise and emission reduction • Fuel consumption • To consolidate the European industry around a project of common European interest

36. Simulator Platform AC, ATM, AP (flight segment)  JTI “Clean Sky”Integrated Technology Demonstrators (ITD) SMART Wing Aircraft Regional Air Transport Green Engines Technology Evaluator ATS Model Green Rotorcraft Systems for Green Operation Eco-Design Linked to “SESAR” Joint Undertaking

37. Technology Evaluator Systems for Smart Fixed Green Sustainable & Green Regional Eco Design Green Operations Wing Aircraft Rotorcraft Green Engines ITD Active Advance d New Advanced Mission & Whole Life Activities Wing Aerodynamics Powerplants LP & HP System Trajectory Cycle (Low Drag & Technology Management Environmental Innovative New Aircraft Noise) Impact Analysis Blades & Rotors Aircraft Energy Configurations New Engine Management Low Weight Concepts New Aircraft Structures (i.e. Open Rotor) Configurations CO ~12 to 20% CO ~10 to 20% CO ~26 to 40% CO ~15 to 20% CO ~10 to 15% CO ~10% Targets 2 2 2 2 2 2 NO ~53 to 65% NO ~15 to 40% Noise ~10dB Noise ~10dB Noise ~17dB Noise ~10dB x x Noise ~10dB Noise ~15dB Co rporate 2020 Widebody 2020 Narrowbody 2015 Regional 2020 Rotorcraft 2020 CO - 30% CO - 30% CO - 20% CO - 40% CO - 30% 2 2 2 2 2 NOx - 30% NOx - 30% NOx - 20% NOx - 40% NOx - 60% Noise - 10dB Noise - 20dB Noise - 15dB Noise - 20dB Noise - 10dB JTI ”Clean Sky” – Targets Products Note: Targets shown represent the incremental impact of JTI

38. Resulting JTI Structure External Bodies ACARE Transport Prog. Committee JTI NS Rep. Group • Main Governing body, • Strategic Orientation. • Commission • 12 ITD Leaders • 6 Associate represent. Joint Undertaking Executive Board European Commission ITD Steering Committees Legal representative of JU + supporting staff, day-to-day operations, communication JU Director Advisory Board JTI scientific, technical, financial, managerial matters ITD Participants Consultative body, 1 representative per participant General Forum • Technical management, • ITD Leaders • Associates • ITD: Integrated Technology Demonstrator Decision Recommendation

39. JTI « Clean Sky »Membership and Participation • Joint Undertaking Members:7-year commitment, contribution to JU resources • European Commission • ITD Leaders • Associates • Participants in JTI:Limited participation in duration and scope • Partners via Calls for proposals • Subcontractors via Calls for Tender Minimum 25% of JTI activities

40. Integrated Technology Demonstrators (ITD) Leaders • SMART Fixed Wing: • Airbus (F, D, UK, E) + SAAB (SE) • Green Regional Aircraft • Alenia Aeronautica (I) + EADS CASA (E) • Green Rotorcraft • AgustaWestland (I, UK) + Eurocopter (F, D) • Green Engines • Rolls-Royce (UK) + Safran (F) • Systems for Green Operation • Thales (F) + Liebherr (D) • Ecodesign • Dassault Aviation (F) + Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (D) SAAB, EADS CASA and FhG were added in past months.

41. JTI « Clean Sky » – Budget(in million €) • SMART Fixed Wing372 24 % • Green Rotorcraft155 10 % • Green Regional Aircraft177 11 % • Green Engines 419 27 % • Systems for Green Operation295 19 % • Eco Design109 7 % • Technology Evaluator 312 % • Running Costs 48 _________ Total 1600

42. JTI “Clean Sky” - Financial Scheme In Cash Annual installments In Kind Annual evaluation • At least 25% of the budget will be dedicated to Partners via Calls for Proposals, enabling wider accession to Clean Sky • A 12% SME participation is envisaged • Max. 3% of budget allocated for operational costs (cash only) ITD Leaders commitment, to be fulfilled via Calls for Proposal

43. JTI “Clean Sky” Time Line • Proposal adopted by Commission, 25th June 2007 • Opinion of European Parliament on 23rd November 2007 • Discussion at Competitiveness Council, 22nd/23rd Nov. ‘07 • Adoption by Council on 13th December 2007 • JU comes in existence after publication in Official Journal • JTI Take-off Forum, 5th February 2008 in Brussels • Becomes operational upon signature of Stakeholder Agreement, Q1 ’08 • First Calls for Proposal by the end ’08, start ’09 (tbc) • Will be published via Clean Sky web-site • National dissemination via NS Representative Group

44. SESAR ObjectivesSingle European Sky ATM Research • A consistent, focussed and users-driven project • Ambitious but realistic objectives for the European ATM infrastructure: • Triple capacity • Half cost • Environmental impact per flight -10% • Factor 10 in terms of safety • A European project which needs to be synchronised with other international initiatives

45. SESAR* Organisation SESAR Consortium The three phases of SESAR: • Definition Phase (2005 - 2007), delivering the European ATM Master Plan • Development Phase (2007 - 2013) to develop the new systems • Implementation Phase (2014 - ) deploy the new technologies *) SESAR = Single European Sky ATM Research ATM Masterplan Joint Undertaking Implementation